Is interventionism overpowered? Why so and why aren't modders changing it?

[unmerged(82704)]

Ever since HoI2 Vanilla interventionism has been the way to go.
There are absolutely no reasons to not pick this.
I'm not sure what "intelligence network distance -/+" means but Im guessing it has something to do with weaker intelligence depending on how far from your capital there are provinces.

Either way it doesn't matter to much.

One thing I was wondering is why Interventionism gives higher consumer goods and why every mod ever made hasn't modded this the other way around? Hasn't isolationism generally led to a lower consumer goods demand and/or higher domestic production?

I'm thinking of Imperial Russia/Northkorea and the 18th century US with its high tariffs.
Japan is also an example.

Sure I could mod this myself and put the file up but is anyone interested?
How come none of you who have made large, awesome mods have done much to balance this setting?

I agree that being an interventionist is usually good for *you* but at the very least it should add something negative beyond the puny "slower relations improvement".

Maybe extra belligerence if you're in war?

 

[razorbird789]

Yes, i think interventionists should get a bonus to resource production and isolationists should get bonus to money production but the bonus's shouldn't be a penalty to the other side of the sliders. (interventionists don't get a money production penalty)