• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
This gave them enough time to finish CK2 without great financial loses.

The decision to make Sengoku had nothing to do with any sort of "financing of CKII".
 
Sure seems like it. It was a cash grab.

You seem to like that phrase, "cash grab". How exactly was the game a cash grab? Are you saying we made a lot of money on it?
 
What is true about Sengoku is that it cost me about $40 on release and then was given away for free with a $20 game what, a year later?

It was released almost one and a half years ago and it did not cost $40 but $30. But I'm not sure what your point is.
 
I agree with OP and not everyone else: In my opinion, Sengoku was a beta for some of CK2's features. It was common rumor shortly after Sengoku was released.

Well if it was a rumor than it must be true.
 
Well, with all due respect, debunk the rumor then...show us what Paradox otherwise intended for this game.

Paradox intended to make a historical strategy game set in medieval Japan - which it did. If it had sold better there would probably have been a number of DLCs and expansions - but it didn't.