Issue - Utrecht bishops become feudal in 1139

[Coemgen]

There is an issue with Utrecht/Stricht. The Prince-Archbishops become feudal lord in 1139 when they acquire Friesland, whose main holding is a castle. The characters are correct, but they are counts instead of prince-bishops (like they should be) all the way to 1337.
This is an issue. I recommend making the main holding in Friesland a church.

 

[schwarherz]

Sorry I can't hear you over the sound of this not being in the suggestions thread

 

[newtlord]

Sorry I can't hear you over the sound of this not being in the suggestions thread

Primus, this is more of a bug report than a suggestion.

Secundus, were it a suggestion, that would still not be an excuse for rudeness.

 

[zeress]

Primus, this is more of a bug report than a suggestion.

Secundus, were it a suggestion, that would still not be an excuse for rudeness.

Fair, but there's a thread for that too though. Also I suppose make note of his signature

 

[vukica]

Yup, definitely can't hear you.

 

[vukica]

I recommend making the main holding in Friesland a church.

That will make every count of friesland a bishop.

 

[newtlord]

That will make every count of friesland a bishop.

Can the main holding be set in the history files to be the church only during those years when the Archbishop holds it?

 

[zeress]

Looking at the wiki page it should be a bishopric anyways throughout, based on a short glance. In the future though there are two different threads this could have been posted in, lest you draw the ire of our resident cranky peoples.

 

[Eternal Phobia]

Fair, but there's a thread for that too though. Also I suppose make note of his signature

I don't really think that the signature makes it any better

 

[schwarherz]

I don't really think that the signature makes it any better

Look, setting a precedent of listening to random suggestions/bug reports from random threads opens the proverbial floodgates. So, rather than ignore them completely, I discourage them with sarcasm and snark. If you or anyone else chooses to get upset about that...it's not really my problem (though, how anyone can get upset over a single sentence directing them to post the idea or bug where it belongs in a silly manner is beyond me). Now, were this in whichever thread is correct for it, this whole kerfuffle could have been avoided and I would have likely responded in a friendly manner to help resolve whatever the issue may be. However, that isn't what happened. So here we are. Anyway...This is off topic.

@Had a dad can we perhaps get this thread closed please?