• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean I'm not sure what you are asking for but have you escalated the war in China to remove the Marco Polo spirit? It looks like your values are low

Also try and get Air superiority
 
  • 12
  • 4Like
  • 3
Reactions:
So some quick notes based on what I have seen.

You probably want to be on total mobalization and not war economy. You can get there by going down the spiritual mobalization focus

Not sure why you ratcheded up your manpower law. Its not really needed this early on and you waste 150 pp. Probably same issue with closing trade

No need for Mot recon on garrison, no need for cav recon on Marines, or imho no recon on most non tank divisions. It drains your support equipment and does not do much in that terrain

I would not do Manchurian route personally. Going down the other path is much more beneficial imo

Im not sure why you have mixed in 3 tanks divisions into your infantry divisions, or if you are trying to do space marines or something, but it doesn't really work that well as Japan because
1. You dont have time on IC output to field that many
2. You dont have enough tanks to field everything, which means that those divisions gets pierced anyway
Stuffing tanks in land based divisions makes them just move slow, especially in China where theres a lot of uneven terrain to slow it down. Tying them to land divisions will make them all move at 4km or whatever the base is.

Probably put down the infantry divisions to 20W. That will change next update but works for now. It also helps a bit with your lacking infantry equipment

I would personally focus more on the air war, make sure to contest air and use tac/cas since the Chinese generally dont have AA protection and their base template is relatively bad and not rely so much on tanks
 
  • 12
  • 6
  • 5Like
Reactions:
Not sure I have understood correctly. Are you asking why there are mixed divisions tanks+infantry? It's how they have been provided by basic templates. I hope you know...
I meant that I wouldn't use that template. use the pure infantry one only for the frontline would be the best. I dont know how many of those you actually deployed, but it would explain some of your tank deficit if you did.

Generally mixed divisions dont fare well as they would if tanks were in tank+mot divisions and infantry as separate. (granted its not always the rule but more often than not)
 
  • 5
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Status
Not open for further replies.