• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Hive

Lex Superior
19 Badges
Oct 16, 2002
12.250
15
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron Anthology
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II
This is a thursday night game playing from 19:30-23:30 CET and hosted in the EU2 channel.

The scenario used is AoI 1492, and we have deployed the following rules:

1. Obey the GM. Always.
3. No gamey play, including weird exploits (and that includes, but is not exclusively, the use of lag colonists, diplomats, et all).
3. Max 1 vassal per nation.

The current year is 1829. Have a look at the stats.

Roster:
Hive (GM) - France
Feanor - Portugal
Fredrik - Denmark
Djeheuty - Ottoman Empire
FAL - Spain
Cheech - Austria
Tonio - Poland
Daniel A - England
Drake - Russia
USA - Bâbur
 
Last edited:
interesting, but with little correction.

would welcome to move the time earlier by 1 hour
at second, if you want additional countries which you mentioned, that is not 1568 scenario :) I hope BUR will be BUR/FLA/HOL combination ?

I would play with 1492 scenario only or earlier - we all hated hightech with stupid massed combats.
 
Tonioz said:
interesting, but with little correction.

would welcome to move the time earlier by 1 hour
at second, if you want additional countries which you mentioned, that is not 1568 scenario :) I hope BUR will be BUR/FLA/HOL combination ?
Tonio, I can't play any earlier than the current time. That I am OK with that time is down to the punctuality of the trains improving here.
I would play with 1492 scenario only or earlier - we all hated hightech with stupid massed combats.
But if we use new CRTs, that isn't so much of a problem.
 
Tonioz said:
interesting, but with little correction.

would welcome to move the time earlier by 1 hour
at second, if you want additional countries which you mentioned, that is not 1568 scenario :) I hope BUR will be BUR/FLA/HOL combination ?

I would play with 1492 scenario only or earlier - we all hated hightech with stupid massed combats.

If we play earlier, at least Owen and PJL (possibly more) won't be able to join.

If it's a 1492 start, Burgundy will be played only untill 1516 - when Spain will inherit. Netherlands will then later be released as a player nation (same thing will apply to USA, btw - are you reading this, FAL?).

Regarding late-tech combats, I do agree that they are kinda annoying. But that's why we will be using Soapy Frog's modified combat charts for NOIV, which should change the 2-seconds annihilation battles of the late tech which we all "love" so much...
 
Inscription

You can count me in too. :)

And I, too, can't make it before 19:00 CET.
 
When NO3 ends I would not have any regular EU2 game going on at all, so I'd like to reserve a spot in this, though I might still change my mind. :)

I'd like 1492 myself.
 
Hive said:
If it's a 1492 start, Burgundy will be played only untill 1516 - when Spain will inherit. Netherlands will then later be released as a player nation (same thing will apply to USA, btw - are you reading this, FAL?).

No.

Regarding late-tech combats, I do agree that they are kinda annoying. But that's why we will be using Soapy Frog's modified combat charts for NOIV, which should change the 2-seconds annihilation battles of the late tech which we all "love" so much...

I would like to see some testing of that one first before throwing it in a campaign...
 
FAL said:
I would like to see some testing of that one first before throwing it in a campaign...

But this next game *will* be testing it.

When Johan makes some radical change in a beta (and he doest that quite a lot), do you then say that you want to "test" the beta in a few skirmish games before using it for your longterm game? :confused:

No better way to test it than using it in a game. And what do we have to lose? It surely can't make combats any *worse*... ;)
 
Hive said:
But this next game *will* be testing it.

When Johan makes some radical change in a beta (and he doest that quite a lot), do you then say that you want to "test" the beta in a few skirmish games before using it for your longterm game? :confused:

No better way to test it than using it in a game. And what do we have to lose? It surely can't make combats any *worse*... ;)

Eh, let's say I have a bit more trust in Johans skills than in someone who hasn't programmed the game.

If the possibility is there to test it before campaign start, I favour that.

You know, I am a little skeptical since I hadn't heard about it before you mentioned it and I also don't know anyone who says it's a very good change...which of course proves nothing, but are just my feelings about it.
 
FAL said:
Eh, let's say I have a bit more trust in Johans skills that in someone who hasn't programmed the game.

If the possibility is there to test it before campaign start, I favour that.

You know, I am a little skeptical since I hadn't heard about it before you mentioned it and I also don't know anyone who says it's a very good change...which of course proves nothing, but are just my feelings about it.
Hive, can you give us a link to the discussion thread for this mod?
 
Hive, i believe nappy test would give good impresssions about fighting on high tech, which we are worried mostly about.
 
Tonioz said:
Hive, i believe nappy test would give good impresssions about fighting on high tech, which we are worried mostly about.

Fine, I'll release a new patch including these battle charts one of the following days... then we can have a test.