• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Introduction

Teutonic_Thrash

Diadochi King
95 Badges
Sep 6, 2011
2.785
401
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Sengoku
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Crusader Kings II: Jade Dragon
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Surviving Mars
  • BATTLETECH
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Crusader Kings Complete
  • Knights of Honor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • BATTLETECH: Season pass
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Surviving Mars: First Colony Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Victoria 2
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
Nothing to Lose but Your Ionic Bonds!

This is a spin-off of my alternate history timeline Nothing to Lose but Your Chains! (available on alternatehistory.com and sufficientvelocity.com), whereby the German Revolution of 1918 successfully results in a socialist Germany. This story will detail the trials and tribulations of the human proletariat in exploring and settling an unknown galaxy. In this AAR, the story and narrative will take precedence over a direct retelling of gameplay events.
 
Geopolitical History of Earth Part 1
Geopolitical History of Earth Part 1

The Great War proved too much for the empires of Europe. In 1917 the Russian monarchy was forced to abdicate and was replaced, first by a self-appointed Provisional Government of liberals and moderate socialists, and then by a soviet government of Bolsheviks (RKPb) and left wing Socialist Revolutionaries (PLSR). The following year the German and Austro-Hungarian empires also collapsed amidst mass starvation and failed military offensives. Much like the Russian Revolution, councils of workers, soldiers, and farmers gained varying amounts of authority in uneasy coexistence with official pro-liberal democratic governments. A military coup by the German high command in 1919 resulted in civil war when a Communist-led United Front of socialist parties, later joined by progressive liberals, fought back against the military junta. The subsequent merging of the German Civil War and the numerous wars which accompanied the dissolution of the Russian Empire resulted in a revolutionary victory over most of Eastern and Central Europe, despite intervention from the Entente. Even the ostensible victors of the Great War did not emerge unscathed. Britain, France, America, and Italy were all destabilized by record levels of proletarian militancy. In Spain, which had not even participated in the war, long-term social and economic conflict exploded into a revolution carried forth by an alliance between the anarcho-syndicalist National Confederation of Labour (CNT) and the newly-established Communist Party (PCE); they were belatedly joined by the reformist Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE).

When the revolutionary wave subsided, the international socialist movement reconfigured itself. The Communist International, established in 1919, grouped together the explicitly revolutionary parties who sought to create socialist democracies comprised of workers' councils. The Comintern was mostly the conception of Vladimir Lenin and Rosa Luxemburg, and rejected the decentralised and ineffectual structure of the defunct Second International which had resulted in most of its member parties supporting their respective countries' participation in the war. For the centrist Marxists and reformists who were sympathetic to the new revolutionary states but rejected the entry conditions of the Comintern, the International Working Union of Socialist Parties was founded by the United Social Democratic Party of Germany (VSPD) and the Social Democratic Workers' Party of German-Austria (SDAPDÖ), both of whom were junior coalition partners to the governing Communist Party of Germany (KPD). The reformists and social democrats who completely rejected the revolution in Europe however re-established the Second International – this time known as the Labour and Socialist International. Dominated by the British Labour Party and the French Socialist Party, the LSI abandoned all pretence to Marxism, revolutionary socialism, and even anti-imperialism and anti-colonialism. Meanwhile in the 1920s, after overcoming factional disputes within the RKPb, Lenin was able to implement his solution to the nationality question: each Soviet republic would remain independent and join a supranational Union of Soviet Republics of Europe and Asia. Lenin died before he achieved his dream however and the subsequent negotiations within the Comintern and with the individual socialist governments was carried out by his successor Lev Kamenev. By the end of the decade, the USREA had been established and all of the socialist states in Eurasia had joined; following the proposal of Amadeo Bordiga, of the Communist Party of Italy (PCI), the USREA was governed by the Comintern. The Czech Republic, a left-leaning liberal democracy surrounded by socialist states, formed close ties with the USREA without becoming a formal member.

The League of Nations became a retreat for the capitalist liberal democracies of Europe. Without the United States, which had receded into isolationism, and with a whole swathe of Europe turning socialist, the League – under British and French domination – became a club for the expansion and consolidation of colonialism abroad and anti-socialism at home. Nowhere was this more apparent than in Italy, where the Communist Party consistently was the largest party in parliament but remained locked out of power by unstable bourgeois coalition governments. Likewise in France the legacy of the Dreyfus affair continued to result in political violence between pro-republican and anti-republican groups, which was only exacerbated by a resurgent socialist Germany. In the 1930s the tensions in Italy finally erupted when the Communists were yet again denied the chance to form a government. The PCI and the anarcho-syndicalists were victorious over a bourgeois and aristocratic establishment which had kept the fascist movement at arms-length, only accepting the aid of Benito Mussolini's paramilitaries when the situation was too far gone. When similar tensions reared their head in Portugal, Britain and France were much more prepared and willing to intervene and defend the forces of capital, resulting in defeat for the revolutionaries.

The spark that led to the Great Revolutionary War (also known as the Second World War) came not from Europe however, but from the Middle East. British authorities in southern Iran were accustomed to violently repressing industrial action by Iranian oil refinery workers, but in the 1940s evidence was discovered which directly linked Iranian unions to the Soviet Socialist Republic of Iran in the north. In the subsequent diplomatic crisis the USREA resolutely backed its southernmost member state and conflict soon broke out. Britain, France, Japan, and Romania – who had done much to militarise the League of Nations – dragged the other capitalist states of Europe into a global war. The United States had remained in self-imposed isolationism from the eastern hemisphere, but the war in Europe and Asia understandably concerned them. As socialist forces made progress into France and the Benelux countries, American president Wendell Willkie convinced Congress to support lend-lease aid to the League of Nations. Meanwhile in Asia, the Chinese United Front of the Guomindang (GMD) and the Communists (GCD), aided by Soviet Russian troops, defended against a Japanese invasion. In colonial India revolutionaries led by the Indian National Congress were engaged in a campaign of mass demonstrations and guerrilla warfare against the colonial powers' decision to bring their respective colonial administrations into the war effort. When the mainland European capitalist powers were on the verge of defeat the Japanese, unable to make progress in China, redeployed their forces to take control of the colonial possessions of their erstwhile allies. Britain and its American backers were shocked but unable to divert attention to the matter. Alone against the entirety of Europe and losing its grip in Asia, Britain tried to hold on through bombing campaigns and a partial blockade. During this time USREA troops marched through Afghanistan and aided the Indian revolutionaries in defeating the colonial administration and their princely collaborators. Eventually a general strike in Britain organised by the Labour Party and the Trades Union Congress caused the collapse of the Conservative government and its replacement by a caretaker Liberal-Labour coalition. In the peace treaty which ended the Great Revolutionary War Britain agreed to recognise the new socialist states established since the end of the Great War and the renunciation of its colonial interests in Iran, India, Burma, and Gibraltar.
 
Last edited:
Intriguing start. :)
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Geopolitical History of Earth Part 2
Geopolitical History of Earth Part 2

The immediate post-war era was a time for reconstruction and self-reflection. The new socialist states of Western Europe were placed under Comintern-administered mandates whose purpose was to ensure a transition to civilian government and socialist democracy. Communist and socialist parties, some of whom had suffered illegality and state repression, were suddenly thrust into power over polarised but weary populations. At the same time the Comintern established the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance under the chairmanship of German communist Fritz Selbmann; its goal to rebuild war-torn states and integrate them into a growing global socialist economy. In Britain, Labour won the first post-war general election on the promise of creating a welfare state, ensuring full employment through Keynesian-influenced corporatism and public ownership, and rolling back the anti-trade union legislation of the interwar period. On the other hand, Labour pursued a staunchly anti-Comintern foreign policy in concert with the United States. Fortunately for them, President Willkie's failure to prevent socialist victory in Europe resulted in his defeat by Harold Stassen who was committed to a more interventionist foreign policy whilst continuing Willkie's New Deal liberalism and mild desegregation. The Transatlantic Treaty Organisation was founded and the Anglo-American alliance vigorously lobbied the liberal democracies of Scandinavia for membership. Sweden was the most obstinate; in addition to its long-standing neutrality, Sweden had remained an important trading partner with Germany even after the revolution. Norway was an equally complicated prospect. The Labour Party (DNA) had been a long-term member of the Comintern, but had participated in coalition governments with the Social Democratic Labour Party (NSA). As the largest party in the Storting, Labour was an effective obstacle to TTO affiliation. Without the participation of Sweden and Norway, the Danish government was unwilling to antagonise their socialist neighbours to the south, though they did cultivate relations with Britain and America.

The aftermath of the Great Revolutionary War in Asia was considerably more complicated than the European front. China's United Front had pushed the Japanese Empire off the mainland, helping to found the all-socialist People's Republic of Korea, but the legacy of the Warlord Era and Japanese collaborationism proved to be a long-term issue. The Indian Revolution resulted in the multi-faceted INC in undisputed control over the subcontinent with the exception of the island of Sri Lanka, where the British had fortified their position. Congress' leader Subhas Chandra Bose sought to forge an inclusive pan-Indian national identity while rapidly industrialising the country. His attempts were frustrated however by liberal and conservative opposition within his party, in addition to ethnic and religious regionalists. On the other hand, formerly French Indochina was comparatively calm relative to its two neighbours; the Communist-led anticolonial movement had easily taken control of the colony when French troops and colonial staff embarked on a mass exodus after the fall of Paris during the war. What had first appeared to be an obvious manoeuvre, Japan's seizure of Portuguese and Dutch Southeast Asia had only given them trouble. Sukarno's Indonesian National Party (PNI) had been waging an USREA-backed rebellion against Dutch authorities and the arrival of Japanese invaders was equally resisted. With the diplomatic break with Britain and America, Japan could rely on no international support for an increasingly unpopular insurgency. By contrast, Britain's control of Malaya and north Borneo was much more secure, threatened only by a dormant Communist movement among the region's Chinese and Indian population.

The Middle East arguably was the most stable region. With the aid of the other USREA states the Soviet Socialist Republic of Iran had unified the country and overthrown the Qajar dynasty. Claims that the Soviets were pawns of old Russian imperialism paled in comparison to the reality of the Qajars being the all-but-official puppets of the British Empire. The Republic of Turkey and the Hashemite-ruled Arab Federation, despite being within the Franco-British sphere of influence, remained neutral during war while the Kingdom of Egypt officially joined the war effort but contributed little. The Hashemite dynasty adopted pan-Arab nationalism in order to curtail the growing anti-imperialist movement which was both left-wing and critical of British and French influence. King Farouk of Egypt on the other hand rejected pan-Arabism, seeing it as a tool of the Hashemites' attempts at achieving hegemony. In turn, this only angered elements of the military who were already opposed to the king's passivity, incompetence, and the British ownership of the Suez Canal. The rest of Africa was in a much worse state however. When the German and Italian empires collapsed their colonies were apportioned among the other Europeans in an organised manner, but with the end of the Great Revolutionary War the other colonies were thrown into chaos. Britain, with American support, tried to assume control over as much of Africa as it could with its limited capabilities. For those colonies that escaped British expansion, colonial administrations – bolstered by exiled European elites – took control, sometimes in collaboration with native elites, other times in conflict. In some rare cases left-wing anti-colonial activists were able to establish functioning administrations. In other words, the sudden onset of a political vacuum resulted in a 'warlord' period which was to assume centre-stage in the upcoming Cold War.
 
These communists seem more dedicated to communist ideas than OTL's Soviets. That's good.

I'm looking forward to how they do in the galaxy. Did any capitalists flee into the stars?
 
Did any capitalists flee into the stars?
Probably not. There will of course be a Space Race between the Anglo-Americans and the Comintern/USREA, but by the time space colonisation for real starts practically every country will have adopted some form of the socialist mode of production.
 
Geopolitical History of Earth Part 3
Geopolitical History of Earth Part 3

During the Great Revolutionary War both sides pursued research into nuclear technology. Even though the Americans were not directly involved in the war, they – in collaboration with the British – progressed the furthest and even achieved successful testing of nuclear bombs. Fortunately the war came to an end without the military use of nuclear weapons, but both the newly-established TTO and the USREA continued to stockpile the new weapons of mass destruction. On the other hand, without the direct evidence of the effects of nuclear weaponry both sides also seriously explored the civilian uses of nuclear power. The proliferation of nuclear weapons resulted in one of the earlier flashpoints of the Cold War; in the late 1950s, the United States had established nuclear bases in the newest TTO member, the Republic of Turkey. Soviet intelligence agencies discovered the threat and of course the Comintern and USREA leadership could not abide by a hostile nuclear presence on their border. Their immediate response was to publicise the TTO's aggression and cut all economic ties with Turkey. A stronger retaliation was desired by some in the communist leadership, while others were wary of risking a nuclear attack. An opportunity presented itself in Egypt where the opposition in the military had organised themselves into the Free Officers Movement, and were in the process of planning a coup. Soviet agents established contact with the coup plotters, offering logistical and intelligence aid; the Free Officers Movement accepted and successfully deposed King Farouk. The new revolutionary government immediately signed a collection of treaties with the USREA, mostly concerning trade and military cooperation. In the following years, the government of Gamal Abdel Nasser was secure enough to nationalise the Suez Canal and strictly regulate transit for the TTO and other enemies of the USREA.

Meanwhile in Asia, the Indonesian Revolution was nearing its conclusion. Driven on by the belief that Japanese defeat was inevitable and aided by the USREA and its allied states of India and China, the broad Indonesian revolutionary alliance inflicted stunningly high casualties against the Japanese military. Discontent at home resulted in the unthinkable; mass student protests against the war were joined by trade union strikes organised under the influence of the large but outlawed Japanese Communist Party. The crisis culminated in a number of liberals from within the governing Imperial Rule Assistance Association throwing their support behind the ant-war movement. Consequently, most of the Japanese cabinet resigned and were replaced by those within the Association who were cunning enough to see which way the wind was blowing. The new government carried out a hasty withdrawal from Indonesia and made a show of scapegoating some of the most visible ministers and generals responsible for the war. For its part, the Indonesian government of Sukarno made an effort to institute a multi-party liberal democracy and to rebuild the country. However factionalism, especially in the form of conservative opposition to Sukarno's orientation towards the USREA, paralysed the government's attempted reforms. As a result, Sukarno and his allies in the Communist Party (PKI) began a period of 'Guided Democracy' whereby all of the major parties were forced into a coalition government.

The success of the Egyptian Revolution acted as a clarion call for the rest of Africa. Across North Africa, previously low-level anti-colonial insurgencies exploded into violence against the French and Italian exile governments. Further to the south, the exiled European warlord states of West Africa responded with extreme repression against leftist anti-imperialist movements. This was only exacerbated when the various warlord states lobbied the TTO for aid and diplomatic recognition. British and American military advisors were deployed in gradually increasing numbers over the years that followed; the USREA and their allies responded in kind. As the casualties mounted on all sides, domestic discontent in the TTO against the West African War increased and also became associated with civil rights movements which, in America, was dominated by the Federated Farmer-Labor Party; an alliance of the Farmer-Labor Party, the Progressive Party, the Socialist Party, and the Communist Party. The anti-war movement's victory came with the surprise presidential win of Federated Farmer-Labor candidates Glen H. Taylor and Charlene Mitchell in 1972. The Taylor-Mitchell administration immediately began to withdraw its troops from West Africa so it could focus on the battle for civil rights with the segregated Democrat-controlled southern states. Numerous civil rights acts were passed with the support of liberal Democrats and Republicans, but the immediate effects were not so apparent when executive agencies and task forces ran into opposition from state governments. Likewise the Liberal-Conservative coalition in Britain was replaced by a Labour government which had devised a roadmap to decolonisation and black-majority rule in Africa. By contrast, popular support in the Soviet states for West African intervention remained high – especially so in the original republics of the Union – and over the years most of the new natively-ruled African countries aligned firmly with the USREA.

With the election of a new left-wing American government, the once-tight grip the United States had over Latin America relaxed. The Central Intelligence Agency still aided their southern allies in repressing any movement to the left of pro-American economic liberalism, but they had to do it discretely to avoid attention from the Taylor-Mitchell administration. While the Cuban Revolution at the end of the 1950s had been a failure, its example remained potent across Latin America. In President Taylor's second term, Brazil's military dictatorship was the first to succumb to leftist revolution, followed soon after by Argentina and Uruguay. The revolutionary victory emboldened socialist guerrillas throughout Latin America, while also causing the CIA to become more overt in their operations. What followed was a public confrontation between the administration and the intelligence community, along with their Democrat and Republican backers. The resulting conservative backlash led to a Democrat presidential victory in 1980, but by that time the USREA had gained a firm foothold in South America and continued to push for more influence.

By the 1980s the Liberal Party of the UK had been reduced to third party status, being squeezed for votes by both Labour and the Conservatives in an age of increasing polarisation. During that decade the Conservative government attempted to carry out wide-sweeping privatisation of British industry but were faced with intense opposition. Despite the relatively small amount of travel and migration between Britain and the USREA, it was becoming common knowledge that in the socialist states indices such as living standards and wealth equality were rapidly increasing due to experimental computerisation of the already democratically planned economy; some of the more industrialised countries, such as Germany and Belgium, were even transitioning from traditional currency to labour vouchers. Even in the liberal democracies of Scandinavia, worker ownership and management was being expanded in an effort to manage the growing deficiency of resources available in the capitalist world. As such, the British proletariat made their displeasure known through industrial action and protests. The Labour Party and the Trades Union Congress leadership, eager to forestall the Communist Party's popularity, supported the strikes and went further by announcing a policy of introducing worker representation on the boards of state-owned corporations once Labour were in government. The public's anger had no immediate effect on the government's plans; the Conservatives had a parliamentary majority and were united behind the party policy, so the privatisation legislation was passed easily. The next general election however resulted in a resounding Labour victory. The new government reversed the preceding privatisation and followed through on their pledge to introduce worker management. British foreign policy underwent an even greater shift; Prime Minister Michael Meacher was the first UK leader to visit the USREA, touring the capital cities of Paris, Berlin, and Moscow, in addition to addressing the annual congress of the Comintern. The, ultimately successful, purpose of the state visits was to dramatically reduce tensions between the two blocs and open the way for negotiations on nuclear proliferation.

Britain's turn towards détente however caused a rift with the Americans; President Zell Miller vetoed Meacher's proposal for a treaty to limit nuclear warhead production. With Anglo-American relations reaching a new low, the US began to reconcile with Japan and began negotiations to bring them into the TTO. Alongside the fervently anti-communist Turkey, the Americans were able to convince the other TTO members to admit Japan into the organisation. The Comintern saw the move as a provocation however, and the Republic of China was inducted as a full member state of the USREA. Simultaneously, the Guomindang became the first non-communist party to join the Comintern, though it had previously sent non-voting delegates to the annual International congresses. By the end of the 1990s, Indonesia had also joined the USREA and India was continuing to strengthen its ties to the Union. Moreover, socialist and left-leaning African countries had established their own African Union with the help of the Comintern.
 
War between the two blocs begins to emerge. Will the US begin a nuclear war?
 
War between the two blocs begins to emerge. Will the US begin a nuclear war?
Spoiler for the US:
There won't be a nuclear war. The US will instead be a reverse of China from our timeline: they'll still claim to be a capitalist liberal democracy but will adopt socialism in order to adapt to the global situation. I may have some parts of the US break off though due to their opposition to the federal government's turn toward socialism.
 
Lol at the USA. The whole scenario reminds me of the red world mod a bit. Totally different setting and time, obviously, but cool nonetheless. Looking forward to more
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The Space Race Part 1
The Space Race Part 1

The conflict between the Comintern-governed Union of Soviet Republics of Europe and Asia and the Transatlantic Treaty Organisation expanded beyond the confines of the Earth. Eager to demonstrate the superiority of their respective socio-economic systems – and increasingly to obtain more resources – the USREA and the TTO both put great effort into reaching for the stars. The United States' National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics was founded in 1915, but it was Soviet Russia's Laboratory for the Development of Inventions, led by Nikolai Tikhomirov, that resulted in the earliest tangible theoretical and practical advancements in rocketry. When the USREA was established at the end of the 1920s rocket and aeronautical research was one of the first areas to be transferred to Union-wide authority. The next decade the Laboratory for the Development of Inventions evolved into the Union-wide Reactive Scientific Research Institute. Its achievements included: the first plotting of a lunar orbit rendezvous; the first test firing of a solid fuel rocket; and the invention of the first rocket-powered aircraft. As tensions between the USREA and the League of Nations grew and resulted in the outbreak of the Great Revolutionary War, both sides turned their respective aeronautical and rocketry industries towards military purposes. With the USREA's early developments, the use of mobile rocket artillery became widespread among the armies of the Soviet states. Alongside rocketry technology, the USREA and the Anglo-American partnership also explored the weaponisation of nuclear technology. The joint British-American Manhattan Project achieved greater results than its Soviet counterpart, perhaps due to opposition within the Soviet scientific community (led by Albert Einstein) towards weaponisation of what had previously been a field for peaceful means. However Soviet infiltration of the Manhattan Project helped to close the gap between the two projects. Ultimately neither side was afforded an opportunity to use a nuclear weapon against an enemy target before the Great Revolutionary War came to an end.

As a result of the socialist victory in the Great Revolutionary War most of Europe was under the control of the USREA. Additionally the Union now had allies in Asia, the most important of whom were India and China. As part of the Comintern's post-war outreach and reconstruction efforts, an International Committee for the Coordination of Aeronautical and Extra-terrestrial Research was established in 1953; it was popularly known as Intercosmos. The USREA's Reactive Scientific Research Institute was folded into the new organisation and the militaries of the Union member states were granted representation on the committee, continuing the precedent of close cooperation between the military and the scientific community. In order to allay fears of militaristic influence Anton Pannekoek, the famed Dutch communist theorist and astronomer, was appointed as the committee's first chairman. Five years later America's National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics was succeeded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); from its beginning, the British were a participant. Unlike Comintern's Intercosmos however, NASA was entirely separate from the TTO and kept its research closely guarded from those outside of a limited circle. Early discussions surrounding the creation of NASA originally intended the agency to be civilian in orientation, but events in 1957 drastically changed Anglo-American priorities.

Since the foundation of Intercosmos, its members had been planning for the construction and launch of an artificial satellite into Earth's orbit. The project gained impetus in 1955 when the American government announced its intention to launch its own satellite. As a result, the Executive Committee of the Comintern approved the satellite project. The first design was rejected by Intercosmos for being too ambitious to reach completion within the projected timeline. The subsequent design was lighter and simpler, thus easier to construct and likely to beat the American project. Launched from Baikonur in the Turkestan Soviet Socialist Republic in 1957, for three months the Unity 1 satellite achieved 1440 orbits of Earth before re-entering the atmosphere and burning up, though only for a fraction of that period did the satellite successfully transmit signals back to Earth. In the spirit of cooperation – and apropos to the satellite's name – the Comintern informed governments and news organisations across the world of the launch's date and intended flightpath. The annual congress of the Comintern was also scheduled to take place shortly after Unity 1's launch. At the event Luigi Longo, President of the Comintern's Executive Committee, gave a speech in which he praised the ingenuity of proletarian science and the material security socialism provided which made such technological advancements possible. Longo ended his speech by calling on the rest of humanity to march united into an unknown future.

The launch of Unity 1 precipitated a crisis in America and Britain. Even though the scientific community in the USREA had been relatively open about the broad strokes of their research, most people in the capitalist states were surprised about both the launch and its success. The American government's transformation of the NACA into NASA saw the reformed organisation as explicitly responsible for civilian and military research. The Turkish Missile Incident, which occurred shortly after Unity 1's re-entry, only confirmed the Anglo-American establishment's fear of an assertive and powerful socialist bloc. NASA accelerated its satellite program but the first attempted launch – Vanguard – was a failure which resulted in the destruction of the launch rocket. The second attempt however was a success. The Explorer 1 was launched in 1958 with more advanced data recording equipment than Unity 1 and transmitted back to Earth for months before running out of power; the satellite itself remained in orbit for years. In their rush to beat Intercosmos NASA attempted many more satellite launches, but most were failures. By contrast Intercosmos focused on fewer but more ground-breaking missions. The Unity 2 was launched a few months after Explorer 1 and was similarly equipped; the satellite broadcast its reading for nearly two months and stayed in orbit for two years. The next major milestone was Intercosmos' Luna 1 mission in 1959; its objective was to land on the Moon. While Luna 1 failed in this regard, missing the Moon, it did get caught in the Moon's gravitational field and thus entered its orbit. Without advanced sensory equipment Luna 1's new position was not as revealing as it could have been yet still represented a great victory for the socialist bloc. NASA paid close attention to the Luna 1 probe and learned from the launch's mistakes to gain the capitalist world's first major victory in the Space Race. A year after Intercosmos' attempt at the Moon, NASA's Ranger 3 probe successfully impacted Earth's natural satellite and thus became the first man-made visitor to another celestial body. Intercosmos however was soon to overshadow the capitalists' great achievement.
 
It's interesting that the Soviets still get the first man in space, and the capitalists still get the first man on the Moon.

I'm interested to see what this great achievement was!
 
It's interesting that the Soviets still get the first man in space, and the capitalists still get the first man on the Moon.

I'm interested to see what this great achievement was!
Ah, I might have been unclear; all of the launches so far have been unmanned satellites and probes. NASA's great achievement was landing their probe on the Moon first.