• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

alhoward

First Lieutenant
68 Badges
Feb 3, 2012
287
31
  • Semper Fi
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • For the Motherland
  • March of the Eagles
  • Rome Gold
  • Darkest Hour
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Victoria 2
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
In EUIII, we had a system where the most important aspects of government policy were set by a system of sliders, representing how centralized a nation was, or how inclined to protectionist policy it was. These were changed at regular intervals, and had the effect of causing a one time bonus or malus such as the spawning of a small group of rebels, or an increase of stability. I was reading Machiavelli, and I was struck by his passage on centralized monarchs:

Now, all princedoms are governed in one of two ways: either by a sole prince served by ministers, or by a prince with barons who hold their rank not by favour but by right of descent. The Turk is an example of the first, the French king of the second. A state of the first kind is difficult to win, but when won is easily held, since the prince's family may be easily rooted out; but in such a state as France you may gain an entry, but to hold your ground afterwards is difficult since you cannot root out the barons.

Machiavelli is comparing a decentralized aristocratic state (France) with a centralized bureaucratic state (the Ottoman Empire). This got me thinking about sliders. Perhaps some manner of de jure centralization can be put in, with a system similar to the way cores are set up, where they are slowly assimilated over time to the level of centralization of the empire. A province with low centralization might have a much higher revolt risk in a highly centralized state, and vice versa. This would prevent a rush toward centralization in still semi-feudal Western Europe, and could do a lot more to address a significant balance between the two.

I think there's a lot that could be added to sliders, any other thoughts?
 
So you would basically like that if the provinces would respond differently when you are trying to centralize them based on their similarity or difference from your oldest provinces. I'm all in.The Hapsburg tentatives to unify their diverse possessions would be much easier to bring in and such countries would be less frequent. It would be a step toward a kind of realism, I think.