• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

How many German cultures for Interregnum 2

  • German, Hansa and Dutch culture (status quo)

    Votes: 4 20,0%
  • Low German, Middle German and High German

    Votes: 7 35,0%
  • Low German and High German

    Votes: 7 35,0%
  • German, Swabisch, Low German and Hansa

    Votes: 3 15,0%
  • Low, Swabisch, High, Rhennish and Hansa

    Votes: 2 10,0%

  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .

MattyG

Attention is love.
15 Badges
Mar 23, 2003
3.690
1
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Deus Vult
  • Diplomacy
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
The discussion over German culture can be found here .

Please read it, contribute and vote on what we ought to do.

Note that Low German means the lowlands, Oldenburg, Mecklenburg and the Pommerns (plus maybe a vew others in the new map).

Hansa is the cosmopolitan culture that can emerge in the main Hanseatic cities.

If low German is chosen, Dutch culture can still emerge later, under certain (as yet undefinied) conditions.

You man choose more than one option in this poll. This sort-of allows preferential voting. Please discuss your choice here, but longer postings about German culture need to go in the manin German culture thread.
 
Last edited:
Why is there no 'merge it all' option?

My vote is for all one culture at the start, then others break off over the course of the game, contingent on event choices, province ownership etc. (ie not absolutely guaranteed to emerge, though preventing their emergence would be a major achievement). Definitely reserve one slot for a breakaway culture in the north, maybe for one in the south (eg Swabian, or mikl's 'Alpen'). We probably don't need more than 3 slots for German/Dutch cultures though. A split between Dutch and Low German isn't likely to serve much purpose with the current setup, whatever happens.

I might also support a generic (pan-European) 'cosmopolitan' culture that is not tied to any one state or original culture. It would be the culture of certain trading cities that become very mixed and don't really fit into any cultural grouping (as opposed to 'unique', which implies the local culture is homogeneous but not in any major grouping). Cosmopolitan would replace the current usage of Hanseatic, but might also pop up in one or two other places.
 
These are not necessarily 'at start' cultures. That's more about how we arrange and apply it.

A poll can't please everyone, as they inevitably exclude someone's preferences or way of voting.

And there is no 'merge it all' option because that isn't, as I see it, an option anyone has put forward, to have just one encompassing German culture, end of story. Seemed a waste of time having it there. We will be at least having German and something else, be it Low German or Hanseatic.
 
BUT, why don't you write in this thread what you'd like the poll to include (please be very specific with the wording) and then I'll set that up.
 
voted second option mostlly becouse it would fit better with the agceep map and will give you less trouble on adjusting it ; but also becouse low,middle, and high are the historical aspect for the period this mod starts as time frame
 
MattyG said:
BUT, why don't you write in this thread what you'd like the poll to include (please be very specific with the wording) and then I'll set that up.

The option I was going to suggest is 'German only' but as you're talking about how many tags to use throughout the game, even I wouldn't pick that one.

One problem I have with the Low/Middle/High nomenclature is it suggests a breakup of German culture is somehow based on/has borders defined by differences in dialect. I'd rather the initial German culture was just called 'German', because it is the culture of the 'Kingdom of Germany' and the 'Holy Roman Empire of the German nation', and isn't confined to the areas where High German is spoken. Breakaway cultures could have different names.
 
Incompetent said:
The option I was going to suggest is 'German only' but as you're talking about how many tags to use throughout the game, even I wouldn't pick that one.

One problem I have with the Low/Middle/High nomenclature is it suggests a breakup of German culture is somehow based on/has borders defined by differences in dialect. I'd rather the initial German culture was just called 'German', because it is the culture of the 'Kingdom of Germany' and the 'Holy Roman Empire of the German nation', and isn't confined to the areas where High German is spoken. Breakaway cultures could have different names.


If the poll included every iteration plus the "but starting all as German" and "but NOT all starting as German", how many option would there be? You're the math student. :rolleyes:
 
Incompetent said:
One problem I have with the Low/Middle/High nomenclature is it suggests a breakup of German culture is somehow based on/has borders defined by differences in dialect.

Language is culture. A major part of it's definition, and point of difference between other cultures, at the very least. Even today, in a united, monocultural and television oriented Germany, the Swabens and the Prussians can barely understand each other.

Made my vote, for Low, Middle and High, along dialect grounds. I feel Hanseatic culture should then develop out of a succesful Hansa in perhaps 1480 or so, as with Dutch developing out of a revolting Holland or Zeeland.
 
mikl said:
Language is culture. A major part of it's definition, and point of difference between other cultures, at the very least. Even today, in a united, monocultural and television oriented Germany, the Swabens and the Prussians can barely understand each other.

Made my vote, for Low, Middle and High, along dialect grounds. I feel Hanseatic culture should then develop out of a succesful Hansa in perhaps 1480 or so, as with Dutch developing out of a revolting Holland or Zeeland.


What is so revolting about Holland and Zeeland? It was quite a nice place when I visited there. And the chocomel rocks.
 
mikl said:
Language is culture. A major part of it's definition, and point of difference between other cultures, at the very least. Even today, in a united, monocultural and television oriented Germany, the Swabens and the Prussians can barely understand each other.

Made my vote, for Low, Middle and High, along dialect grounds. I feel Hanseatic culture should then develop out of a succesful Hansa in perhaps 1480 or so, as with Dutch developing out of a revolting Holland or Zeeland.

Dialect-wise Dutch should already exist in 1419 (as should Frisian, but that's another matter). East of the Low Countries there's a fairly shallow gradient with mutual intelligibility extending a long way (especially in the middle), and we could divide it in two (Low + High) or three (Low + Middle + High). I think Dutch, Low and High should be enough on purely language grounds, with Hanseatic and Swabian possible as later developments.
 
mikl said:
Language is culture. A major part of it's definition, and point of difference between other cultures, at the very least. Even today, in a united, monocultural and television oriented Germany, the Swabens and the Prussians can barely understand each other.

Made my vote, for Low, Middle and High, along dialect grounds. I feel Hanseatic culture should then develop out of a succesful Hansa in perhaps 1480 or so, as with Dutch developing out of a revolting Holland or Zeeland.


Language is culture is a contemporary ackowledgement of the importance of language in defining and supporting distinctiveness in an increasingly interconnected world.

Even if we accept this rather post-modern approach to defining culture as being still valid in the 1400s, then the problem lies eslewhere. Our problem is one of semantics. I do not believe for one moment that Paradox intended this meaning of culture. So, if we stick with language = culture ( which means therefore that culture = language) then we need to use a different word for that thing we have in each province in EU2, because it isn't culture.
 
The Poll has closed and it's a dead heat.

I voted only for two german cultures, High and Low, but meant to vote for both High/Low and High/Middle/Low but miss-clicked the button.

Which means the real winner is to have three German cultures.

I am going to pass the baton now to Incompetant to flesh out the distribution of cultures among the new provinces.
 
MattyG said:
The Poll has closed and it's a dead heat.

I voted only for two german cultures, High and Low, but meant to vote for both High/Low and High/Middle/Low but miss-clicked the button.

Which means the real winner is to have three German cultures.

I am going to pass the baton now to Incompetant to flesh out the distribution of cultures among the new provinces.

Well, unfortunately this doesn't tell us on what basis they should be arranged. We can have:

1. High German, Low German, Dutch
2. High German, Middle German, Low German (with Dutch subsumed into Low German).
3. We divide up the HRE in an unconventional manner, based on e.g. loyalty to HRE, whether the economy is primarily urban or rural, type of political system that's traditional in that area etc.

Having Dutch separate as in 1. makes most sense in terms of dialects, and will give us better control over the cultural setup of Bavaria and Burgundy (who get Dutch, but unlikely to get Low German) and the TO (who get Low German, but never Dutch). It also gives more options for potential Dutch states of course.

Having Middle German separate as in 2. gives us better control over Swabia (may lose Middle German and keep High) and Bohemia (perhaps would get Middle German only).

Unconventional approach depends on how we do it. All I can think of is that the cities of the TO might conceivably have more affinity with those of southern Germany and indeed Hungary than they do with the Hansa cities. But that can be dealt with using Hanseatic culture. In any case, as long as we allow a fair amount of fluidity, we can make exceptions for particular provinces while basically sticking to plan 1. or plan 2.

So which is it going to be? The poll option says Low, Middle, High; but Low, High, Dutch wasn't an option, and there's been some confusion over what these words mean anyway, so I'd take the result so far as a generic vote for 'three cultures'. Then there's the question of whether or not that includes Hanseatic. With the events as they are, my preference is for 1, as the Low Countries have received a lot more attention than central Germany (which isn't much of a cultural region anyway).

If we go to four cultures, we can obviously implement plan 1 and plan 2 simultaneously. That would give a total of five predominately German/Dutch cultures in the game if we throw in Hanseatic as well. I don't think that's too extravagant given the complexity of the situation in the HRE, the number of majors that get involved and the huge number of provinces the area is going to have on the new map. But on the other hand, we're talking about an area that is relatively homogeneous culturally, so it's splitting hairs a bit to divide things up so much.

What I'll do is produce a plan 1 divide and a plan 2 divide, and see how they differ. The Hanseatic question is separate, but we already know pretty much where it will emerge if it does, so we can leave that one for later. As for culture tags, I'd say whichever options we pursue, the best approach is to leave Hansa (canary) and Dutch as they are, rename German to High German, and then use two new tags for Low German and Middle German. Things can then stay this way until we need to use the tags elsewhere in the world.
 
Last edited:
From the original Poll posting:

"If low German is chosen, Dutch culture can still emerge later, under certain (as yet undefinied) conditions."


So, when people voted for Low German they were voting for Dutch as well to emerge later under certain (likely) circumstances.

So, that answers many of your queries. But, of course, once you have assigned the various cultures to provinces and to owning countries, it will get the heck reviewed out of it by those who care.

We are a smallish group. Make some decisions and let's run it up the flagpole.

Did you get the forwarded message?

Matty
 
MattyG said:
From the original Poll posting:

"If low German is chosen, Dutch culture can still emerge later, under certain (as yet undefinied) conditions."


So, when people voted for Low German they were voting for Dutch as well to emerge later under certain (likely) circumstances.

So, that answers many of your queries. But, of course, once you have assigned the various cultures to provinces and to owning countries, it will get the heck reviewed out of it by those who care.

We are a smallish group. Make some decisions and let's run it up the flagpole.

Did you get the forwarded message?

Matty

Received and replied (via email). :D