• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Gouda_boy

First Lieutenant
52 Badges
May 30, 2017
236
626
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
Hello Paradoxians,

This issue I would like to bring up is not really about EU4 itself, but rather, this forum for suggestions. I mean this in a positive and constructive way!

Now, I am not one who exactly scours the entire forum for everything, but I got to thinking about how so many people put in hours or even days of research (as I did for Nubia) for certain areas like adding Slovenian/Fixing Carniola, or separating Turkish into a separate group, or India, or Egypt, or the new world, or simple changes, who then place their ideas and all their knowledge/research they have gained onto a thread like this one to perhaps inspire the Devs to add the proposed content to this great game. Whether to increase overall historical accuracy, or better the Gameplay, there is a lot of motivation for someone in this community to help better the game, which is such an amazing thing that you Devs work with the community. But there are two major flaws in this that I ask you to consider improving upon!

1. Lack of Communication between Suggestions and Devs. (I also mean this politely)
One major flaw that I discovered is your lack of communication to those that have made very plausible and understandable suggestions onto the forum. Maybe a few to tens of ideas flood through on the day to day, and get some responses and agreement from other viewers. Maybe the suggestion gets 50 agrees and a thousand views! However, even with all that, there is no telling if you Devs have even looked at or seen the post. Seldom do I see you Devs respond to any suggestions whatsoever. Some responses are mere "corrections" of a suggestion. Does this mean that there is no compromise on the idea? Is that entire suggestion on adding flavor to Hindu nations kaput because something was wrong? Or perhaps the ideas that many agree with to fix a few things in the 1.23 Persia update is out of the question? We don't know.

I was never told if my suggestion for Nubia was good or bad (except by other players). I was not told if it might be considered. I was not told it would or would not be added. I was not told anything, I was simply left with a few fellow players liking my suggestion or disapproving. I need to know if my suggestion, where i spent 5 days researching, could make it into the game or not. I am simply asking for an Answer. I understand as developers of multiple games, you don't always have the time to look through the forum to answer questions and whatnot, which is what brings me to Issue #2 (Which will also talk about adding a weekly, or every other weekly polling system in the suggestions forum).

2. Are you actually using anybody's suggestions? If so, Credit Where Credit Is Due!
A smaller issue, and please, please correct me if I am wrong, but looking through the Dev Diaries, I have not seen any recognition for ANY users. Whether crediting a single user, or you would like to be generic (saying "thanks to the community") if any ideas, whether small or large, have been used or incorporated into the game, I think Users should be recognized for the aid provided (Perhaps the small ideas can be credited to the Community, but bigger changes should be more personal). Let us know if the community actually contributed or at least inspired something for the patch, it makes us feel like we are able to accomplish what we set our mind to (at least for the forum ^^). Lastly, let us know if you tried to incorporate a suggestion into the game (say, separating the Turkish culture), but it just didn't work out, so we know you tried for us, and did what you could :).

Another way is to add in a polling system into the suggestion forums. If you see suggestions you personally see enhancing EU4, find out if the community thinks that too! If you have little time to look closer at a suggestion, or can't respond, compile a list of ones that seem interesting and ask the community for help to see if they want it in the game. An example:

"Hey, @Trin Tragula here (How does Trin talk usually?), today we have some great ideas from you guys that we Devs would like to consider. What do you guys think?"

(In real poll form)

"Add Greek cores once Byzanitum Cores Expire:
yes: 37
no: 23

Add provinces and flavour to the Balkans:
yes: 15
no: 40

Remove French core on Labourd and Bordeaux: :rolleyes:
yes: 2
no: 89

Add Slovenian Culture and new provinces/countries in Austria:
yes: 63
no: 60"

I hope this is seriously thought over and sincerely considered by the Developers, to bring better communication between you and the community.
Thank you.
 
Upvote 0
I think it would be terrible idea to basically poll features on a forum where the 50 regular people on it arent represantive of the overall customer base.

Tens of thousands of people on steam: "Woah there sure is a lot of stuff in this game, how do I attack England? Why did I get bad stability and 219 % overextension? France can't kill anything this sucks I'm off."

Forum poll what would you like to see:

Tutorial - 2 votes
Granada events for conquering Spain - 95 votes
 
If anything it would be nice if they let the community know a bit in advance what upcoming patches would be about. for example already announcing that patch 1.24 will focus on west africa or steppe hordes, giving people time to develop suggestion unlike now when as soon as people catch on that what a new patch are gonna be about (1.20 was about east asia and 1.23 about middle east) we see an increase in suggestions covering those regions which are all too late to acctually make it into the game.
 
If anything it would be nice if they let the community know a bit in advance what upcoming patches would be about. for example already announcing that patch 1.24 will focus on west africa or steppe hordes, giving people time to develop suggestion unlike now when as soon as people catch on that what a new patch are gonna be about (1.20 was about east asia and 1.23 about middle east) we see an increase in suggestions covering those regions which are all too late to acctually make it into the game.

That is also very true, I really agree with this statement to tell us the region in advance. Ideas and suggestions struggle to get off the ground as mechanics, provinces, and gameplay has already been developed and it seems the developers will not be the keenest to redo their work.
 
I too would like to know if any dev has taken a peek at whatever thread and thought, 'hey, that's a good idea, but it won't work because X', or 'well maybe in a couple patches when we're focusing on the region' or even a 'not going to ever happen'. I don't even want an answer, I just want to know if the suggestion was even seen.

I have a few quandaries over letting us know about patches beforehand, though, since oftentimes even with the current update status it attracts quite a bit of nationalistic sentiment and a bunch of... not exactly helpful suggestions, about the upcoming areas; perhaps I'm wrong and the good far outweighs the bad, but then they have a potentially massive bog of information to sift through as everyone living in and around the region has a plethora of ideas on how to implement a regional update.
 
I too would like to know if any dev has taken a peek at whatever thread and thought, 'hey, that's a good idea, but it won't work because X', or 'well maybe in a couple patches when we're focusing on the region' or even a 'not going to ever happen'. I don't even want an answer, I just want to know if the suggestion was even seen.

I have a few quandaries over letting us know about patches beforehand, though, since oftentimes even with the current update status it attracts quite a bit of nationalistic sentiment and a bunch of... not exactly helpful suggestions, about the upcoming areas; perhaps I'm wrong and the good far outweighs the bad, but then they have a potentially massive bog of information to sift through as everyone living in and around the region has a plethora of ideas on how to implement a regional update.

I know what you mean, there are tons of bad suggestions around the forum (some of them are mine aswell). Nationalistic sentiments will happen no matter what
 
All threads in the forum are read, i and others do so every week (day for me), but there’s simply no time to post in all of them. As some have noted in this very thread the suggestions forum moves very quickly.
Those of us that are reading it are the devs working on the actual game. This is great as it allows you to give suggestions directly to us, and for us to reply and discuss them, but it is also quite time consuming. There’s no time to reply to everything and that is not the function this forum has.
When we do adapt something we will, if able (sometimes what’s in the future can be secret), post so in the relevant thread (as anyone reading the forum for a longer period will have seen). For significant contribution we have in the past also acknowledged people in our dev diaries.
Sometimes we also deliberately avoid replying to let a discussion have its own life, a dev response might well end a useful suggestion thread prematurely when others might contribute more. We also avoid replying if it could be seen as promising something we aren’t entirely sure we will provide.
The suggestions forum remains a great resource for many of us but polls would not really give us anything of worth, it’s not here to check the majority opinion (and a poll would be unlikely to give us that anyway), it’s here to be a provider of ideas and feedback, and I personally have quite a few threads marked for future use.

I encourage anyone to use this forum that want to influence the game but I cannot blanket promise anything in terms of replies or implementation. If you feel it’s not worth your time in that case that is up to you. I do feel the forum itself and the possibility for us to participate here (something we do as often as we can) is a strength for development purposes and I am glad that so many find their way here.
 
If I may be so bold, how about bringing back the ancient tradition of marking a post as helpful if the devs have read it? Or maybe even a separate rating "acknowledged" that only the devs could add and only on the suggestion, bugreport and tech suppor forums. Just a way for the community to know we are being read.
 
If I may be so bold, how about bringing back the ancient tradition of marking a post as helpful if the devs have read it? Or maybe even a separate rating "acknowledged" that only the devs could add and only on the suggestion, bugreport and tech suppor forums. Just a way for the community to know we are being read.

I sometimes still mark as helpful but it’s from what I understand not very easy for posters without moderation privileges to see who marked something as helpful which when pointed out to me has made me use it less.
The special “read by dev” mark is an interesting suggestion and I will forward it. For now though it is safe to assume anything in the suggestions forum for eu4 will be read.
 
Not true, you can see ratings you received on your profile.
Yes, but you can't see the ratings of others (who gave them, that is), so you can't know if other people's suggestions have been read.
 
I sometimes still mark as helpful but it’s from what I understand not very easy for posters without moderation privileges to see who marked something as helpful which when pointed out to me has made me use it less.
The special “read by dev” mark is an interesting suggestion and I will forward it. For now though it is safe to assume anything in the suggestions forum for eu4 will be read.

Thank you! You are a saint.
 
I'd prefer it if people who suggest culture/religious changes do so on the condition that they provide contemporary and modern (as in modern talking about the past) sources.

Furthermore, map changes suggestions should be based on contemporary administrative divisions or - more importantly - geographic significance during the EU4 timeframe.

I have been lurking this thread for some time and too often people forget that their own bias and personal interest (we're all guilty of this) may not be very relevant for EU4 or historically accurate.

Lastly, when it comes to changes in modifiers and warfare I'd like to see calculations and thorough AARs of playthroughs.

Having polls decide what should change sounds like the worst idea to me.
 
I'd prefer it if people who suggest culture/religious changes do so on the condition that they provide contemporary and modern (as in modern talking about the past) sources.

Furthermore, map changes suggestions should be based on contemporary administrative divisions or - more importantly - geographic significance during the EU4 timeframe.

I have been lurking this thread for some time and too often people forget that their own bias and personal interest (we're all guilty of this) may not be very relevant for EU4 or historically accurate.

Lastly, when it comes to changes in modifiers and warfare I'd like to see calculations and thorough AARs of playthroughs.

Having polls decide what should change sounds like the worst idea to me.

I don't really understand what you mean. It seems only the last sentence of your post applies to this thread..