I was experimenting with some of the ahistorical monarch choices, and ran into a few oddities:
1. Event 3770, polish succession of 1669
choice C Frederick William of Brandenburg (Fryderyk Wilhelm)
1a. The text for event 3497, ending the stagnation, assumes Sobieski is the monarch
1b. Fryderyk Wilhelm is supposed to die in May 1688, but there isn't a successor. The list of monarchs in the in-game ledger shows him twice, one ending in 1688 and the other continuing until April 1689 when the default Sejm Walny takes over. Sejm Walny is supposed to be a fallback, so presumably there should be a proper successor; if not, the end date for Fryderyk Wilhelm needs to be later, or the start date for Sejm Walny needs to be earlier.
2. Event 3486, polish succession of 1697
choice C Jakub Sobieski
2a. The text for event 3498, ending the stagnation, assumes Friedrich Augustus is the monarch
Also, the text for 3498 reads:
"He and his allies underestimated the ease with which they would smash the eighteen year old monarch of Sweden" -- it should be "overestimated"
1. Event 3770, polish succession of 1669
choice C Frederick William of Brandenburg (Fryderyk Wilhelm)
1a. The text for event 3497, ending the stagnation, assumes Sobieski is the monarch
1b. Fryderyk Wilhelm is supposed to die in May 1688, but there isn't a successor. The list of monarchs in the in-game ledger shows him twice, one ending in 1688 and the other continuing until April 1689 when the default Sejm Walny takes over. Sejm Walny is supposed to be a fallback, so presumably there should be a proper successor; if not, the end date for Fryderyk Wilhelm needs to be later, or the start date for Sejm Walny needs to be earlier.
2. Event 3486, polish succession of 1697
choice C Jakub Sobieski
2a. The text for event 3498, ending the stagnation, assumes Friedrich Augustus is the monarch
Also, the text for 3498 reads:
"He and his allies underestimated the ease with which they would smash the eighteen year old monarch of Sweden" -- it should be "overestimated"
Upvote
0