• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Ryuga81

Private
112 Badges
Mar 7, 2005
22
6
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Impire
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • King Arthur II
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Lead and Gold
  • Leviathan: Warships
  • Magicka
  • Majesty 2
  • Majesty 2 Collection
  • March of the Eagles
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Naval War: Arctic Circle
  • Pirates of Black Cove
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Ship Simulator Extremes
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • Supreme Ruler: Cold War
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Dungeonland
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Cities in Motion
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For the Motherland
  • Gettysburg
Any chance for some sneakier tactics option with the next expansion? I mean, as it is now, it's either total victory or total defeat, i'd really like to see a viable "retreat" option on the battlemap. It's often necessary in order to soften up a bit the enemy troops in the endgame to send a knight with an army to certain death in order to let the next one to win (especially considering the AI will "cheat in" endless cash and rebuild whole heavy cavalry armies each year while I, the ruler of the entire southern Britain, am unable to restock more than a dozen units every winter, so any excess loss might cost me the entire war)...
 
Sounds like there's a few issues. Some tips:

1. Always ensure you have a warlord leading every army, and focus purely on leadership and reign. It'll reduce the upkeep costs of *every* unit, and the warlord gets a lot of beneficial skills to province ruling and armies they lead.
2. Only ever give provinces to your warlords, and pay close attention to any skills they or their wives have which will affect the province. Never hand a province over to a sage or champion unless you absolutely have to (i.e. loyalty drop without one)
3. Champions, sages et al should be placed in the same armies as your warlord leaders, not lead armies of their own. Not only do they too benefit from the warlord's skills, but you can afford to focus these purely on fighting and magic. Also note that even without any particular skills, the mere presence of a hero in a unit will let them achieve victories over units which, on paper, should slaughter them. Although this applies to enemy heroes too ...
4. Only recruit the armies you need. You don't have to defend every town, stronghold or even province. Income is generated each winter, so as long as you can recapture the province by then it makes no difference who owns it the rest of the year; similarly, it's usually better to focus on wiping out one enemy entirely that defend against multiple fronts; losing a province in return for eliminating an entire kingdom is a good trade off. This is of particular note by the endgame when you'll pretty much be losing provinces no matter what you do, you need to focus on your goals and ignore the chaos in the rest of the country.