• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
:(

But then again it is better to wait for a game then to get a game that needs a lot of patching to be playeble.
 
Originally posted by natt och dag
It is even better to have a game released early and without the need for patches:)


Oh hey, it's the "I want it all-guy" :D

But that would be great of course yes.. :)
 
Originally posted by Lethke
:(

But then again it is better to wait for a game then to get a game that needs a lot of patching to be playeble.

As long as you don't have to wait too long. If we're still debating the release of CK by this time next year then I would say that there are problems. If it gets released by March that will be o.k. (of course I would like it sooner).:)
 
Well, both are very ambitious projects..I guess that HoI was started earlier than CK..probably as simple as that..

Yep, HOI was started earlier than CK. I hope taht both will be the great games!:) However, I will ask for screenshots only every 4 weeks, then 4 weeks after that, and on so:D :p
 
Originally posted by Lethke
:(

But then again it is better to wait for a game then to get a game that needs a lot of patching to be playeble.

I disagree - I'd prefer to get my hands on a game earlier, and have at least some voice in improving it through patches :)
 
Originally posted by natt och dag
It is even better to have a game released early and without the need for patches:)

I'm xure u could have the game right now and it would run fine without patches, but u wouldn't have much to do with it. :D
 
Originally posted by Galadriel
I gets the impression that HoI is nb 1 priority and CK is nb 2

Don't think it is as much priority as it is who is first in line. HOI is further along and those final polishing touches need to start getting ready to be applied. CK still has a long way to go. Once HOI is out the door then CK will get more of the attention.:)