It was a fair while since I looked into this but I know I ended up with the current solution. Feel free to provide sources for Arakan actually being subservient to Bengal though and it might be revisited data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
IIRC the Ganeshas helped the Mrauk-U back to power but if I recall correctly their ties to them were never that strong (and either way by the start of our game the short reign of the Ganeshas in Bengal is already over).
The Arakanese/Mrauk-U/Magh are generally referred to in pretty harsh ways by Bengal and later Mughal chroniclers as they encroached on both lands and Bengali trade a lot. They also took in Bengali outcasts and sheltered all kinds of pirates who had similar interests in raiding the ships headed for Chittagong or the Ganges Delta. That doesn't mean they couldn't have been vassals in 1444 in itself though.
Still it's a far cry from the states of Garjat, who were almost religiously devoted (if at times a bit unruly) to whoever held the Orissa coastline.
EDIT: To add some more info.
IIRC the Ganeshas helped the Mrauk-U back to power but if I recall correctly their ties to them were never that strong (and either way by the start of our game the short reign of the Ganeshas in Bengal is already over).
The Arakanese/Mrauk-U/Magh are generally referred to in pretty harsh ways by Bengal and later Mughal chroniclers as they encroached on both lands and Bengali trade a lot. They also took in Bengali outcasts and sheltered all kinds of pirates who had similar interests in raiding the ships headed for Chittagong or the Ganges Delta. That doesn't mean they couldn't have been vassals in 1444 in itself though.
Still it's a far cry from the states of Garjat, who were almost religiously devoted (if at times a bit unruly) to whoever held the Orissa coastline.
EDIT: To add some more info.
Last edited:
- 1