Should development of tactics be technologies in CK3?

[Denkt]

I think different armies developed different tactics, like the English tactics during hundred year was seems to have been inspired by tactics used by the vikings hundred of years earlier, which actually make alot of sense given the history which lead to that kind of tactical development.

Other armies developed completely different tactics based on what their enemies used, what their terrain was and simply what resources they had access to and this could lead to very different armies with different strengths and weakness.

One thing in CK which was not in CK2 was development of different weapons and armors which have their own advantages and drawbacks which make armies more unique.

 

[Jia Xu]

No. It would be too gamey. Warfare would be about rushing to the cultural tactics tech and destroying everyone else before they could get it. The steppes would be particularly vulnerable because they need their Altaic retreat and ambush to be competitive.

In any case, much has likely changed in CK3 and there's not much point in discussing it until we get DDs on technology and tactics

 

[Denkt]

No. It would be too gamey. Warfare would be about rushing to the cultural tactics tech and destroying everyone else before they could get it. The steppes would be particularly vulnerable because they need their Altaic retreat and ambush to be competitive.

It depend on how impactful these things actually would be, I don't see why not the nomads should not have an advantage on the steppe but making them unbeatable would make no sense whatsoever.