• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

The_Human_Oddity

Second Lieutenant
28 Badges
Jul 14, 2016
199
33
www.theuselessweb.com
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II
Sources used to make the pre-1836 history of Sindh:
https://books.google.com/books?id=H...frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false (preview book)

This is my first AARR and I hope I don't screw up on everything. This will talk about both the pre-1936 history of Sindh, from the times of its first permanent settlers in 7,000 BC to the times of stress between the Sindh region and the Punjab in 1836. From there it will take an alternate history course as I continue through my own game until 1935, unless I mod the game to continue past that.

How to pronounce some words:
Mehrgarh: Mu-gah
Sindh: Sin-d-h (http://www.pronouncenames.com/pronounce/Sindh)


Table o' Contents:

The First Sindh (7000 BC to 5500 BC)
Artist and Blacksmith of Sindh (5500 BC to 3300 BC)
The Fall of the Mehrgarh Settlement and the Rise of a Civilization (3300 BC to 2800 BC)
The End of Mehrgarh and the Maturing of Harappan (2800 BC to 1800 BC)
The Fall of the Harappan Civilization (1800 BC to 1000 BC)
The Lone City and the Exchanging of Sindh (1000 BC to 700 AD)
The Islamic Exchange of Sindh (700 AD to 1500 AD)
The Arrival of the Mughal Empire (524 AD to 1783 AD)
The Talpur tribes of Sindh (1783 AD to 1835 AD)
 
Last edited:
The First Sindh (7000 BC to 5500 BC)

7000 BC, the time of the Neolithic. This saw the time of the Elamites in the Middle East, the Peligangs of China, the Papaus people learning how to farm and domesticate their slaughter, the creation of the stone statues in what is now Ain Ghazal, and the region of Sindh, the Mehrgarh settlement in what is to be Pakistan.

quellen0214.jpg

A map of the region showing Mehrgarh

As you can see by the map the settlement of Mehrgarh wasn't even located in Sindh (to differentiate between the different regions look at the green lines as those show the outline of Punjab, Sindh, and Balochistan), so what importance does it have to Sindh? Well, Sindh was a region settled by many, one being the Indus River Civilization. Mehrgarh is, at least thought to be to the extent we know, the precursor of the Indus River Civilization. Besides the fact that it is located in the region the Indus River Civilization will be and that it is older, for its time it was also the most advanced settlement in all of the Balochistan, Sindh, and Punjab region.

For one to know just how advanced you must look at their beginning, the start of their civilization. While their exact origin isn't known, the founders of this site do have a good idea of the area they came from. Quoting from the History Section on Mehrgarh from Wikiapledia, the Free Encyclopedia:

"Jean-Francois Jarrige argues for an independent origin of Mehrgarh. Jarrige notes "the assumption that farming economy was introduced full-fledged from Near-East to South Asia," and the similarities between Neolithic sites from eastern Mesopotamia and the western Indus valley, which are evidence of a "cultural continuum" between those sites. But given the originality of Mehrgarh, Jarrige concludes that Mehrgarh has an earlier local background," and is not a "'backwater' of the Neolithic culture of the Near East.""

To put it short, he is saying the founders of Mehrgarnh came from around that area and didn't migrate from somewhere else, didn't originate from any other (at least known) civilization at the time.

In 6500, whoever they may have been before Mehrgarnh, established it. This saw arrangements of mud houses being built in quads (as seen in the picture below) and land for farming behind made along with domesticated animals. The goods they harvested from their fields included emmer wheat, jujubes, dates, barley, and einkorn in rows of six along with herding numerous types of cattle which includes sheep, goats, and zebus. Early on, as they were aceramic (meaning literally 'without pottery') they fashioned simple ceramic dolls (even though they didn't make anything else out of clay) that had little detail and made baskets out of bitumen. Curiously, and still unknown reason, all the early clay dolls are feminine, most of them holding a child dubbing them as depictions of the 'Mother Goddess', with male dolls not appearing until 2600 BC. Even with those advances they still used stone tools, unable to fashion the local copper into instruments of farming. There were also two types of burials found to be conducted by the Mehrgarh, the first one being a independent burial where the body is encased in narrow mud walls and then the collective burial where six bodies are taken, placed in a flexed position going from East to West and enclosed in thin mud brick walls. Burials tended to have offerings in them, much like the ancient Egyptians did with pyramids, but this slowly started to fade as it became twilight for this settlement.


images

The excavated settlement of Mehrgarh
4d37ee71473178476c1c1dade34c84fb.jpg

A early clay doll showing the 'Mother Goddess'


The most interesting part of this is the evidence of proto-dentistry, being the first (documented) to use it in South Asia. Proto-dentistry is simply the term for 'the first dentistry'. Evidence can be seen from the skeletons of the dead as their mollers were drilled into, obviously not for aesthetic purposes just due to the teeth they drilled. Quoting from a article quoting the team who discovered this (which they found 11 crowns):

"The eleven crowns were exclusively either first or second permanent molars, a fact that the team says rules out driling for aesthetic purposes, as the teeth were too far back in the mouth. Although the exact motive for the drilling remains unclear, four teeth show signs of caries associated with the hole, which could indicate that the drilling was for therapeutic or palliative reasons in some cases. The flint drill heads at Mehrgarh were found associated with beads, suggesting that skills developed for bead making were successfully transferred to drilling teeth." - The team that excavated the proto-dentistry discovery, http://www.nature.com/bdj/journal/v200/n8/full/4813555a.html


However, the domesticated animals and the farming lead to a rapid decline in hunting, it soon being nothing other than a sport to the Mehrgarh people and no longer a needed luxury. All of this compiled together and you get the most advanced settlement in the region and of its time until 3000 BC.


Sources used for this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehrgarh#Mehrgarh_Period_I_.287000_BCE-5500_BCE.29 - Information on the Mehrgarh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindh#Prehistoric_period - Information on the Mehrgarh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Sindh#Ancient_era - Information on the Mehrgarh
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/History_of_Sindh/Early_farming_cultures#Neolithic_Mehrgarh - Information on the Mehrgarh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic - Definition of Neolithic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balochistan,_Pakistan - The location of the Mehrgarh
http://www.nature.com/bdj/journal/v200/n8/full/4813555a.html - Proto-Dentistry team
 
Last edited:
Artist and Blacksmith of Sindh (5500 BC to 3300 BC)

5500 BC, beginning of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture of Europe, the creation of the Tell Zeidan settlements in Syria, the start of the Samarra culture in Iraq, the building of the Xinle culture in China, the Ancient Egyptians of the past delving into agriculture, and the start of the Predynastic period in Egypt, and 1500 years into the life of the Mehrgarh settlement.

Still Neolithic but soon to be chalcolithic, this is probably the most important period of growth for the Mehrgarh. With their discovery of metallurgy, turning their local copper into tools of farming and manufacturing, came many new techniques and technologies brought to this people.

476q-19.jpg

A overflight view of the exposed Mehrgarh remains.

Besides the copper tools, this period saw the move from a Neolithic aceramic settlement to a Neolithic ceramic settlement (meaning 'with pottery'). No longer was the clay restricted to the making of terracotta figurines but now it was also used in the constructions of containers, decorated with designs ranging from simple leaves to delicate and beautiful patterns of animals and stories. This also saw the construction of glazed faience beads, their first terracotta (clay) button seals, the more advanced making of terracotta dolls in 4000 BC, and the making of updraft and deep pit kilns (a type of early oven).

Mehrgarh-Pottery-Pictures.jpg

A ceramic pot.
Figurines-of-the-Mehrgarh.jpg

Terracotta dolls, make note of the advancement in design as seen in the obvious breast and hairstyles.

The types of copper tools ranged from hoes to copper melting crucibles. While evidence of these tools are limited (or at least pictures of them), seeing as 12,000 artifacts were gathered from Mehrgarh and that tools such as shovels have been discovered, along with the fact that they are farmers it is safe to assume they has hoes and those such tools for farming. The crucibles themselves were, like pottery and other large tools, decorated with designs around the exterior of it, as seen in the picture below.

Mehrgarh-Tools.jpg

A copper crucible decorated in designs and made from this period.

Even with the advances in metallurgy, the making of copper tools, stone tools were still in existence with the population along with flint tapping, bead making, and tanning. Around this time they also expanded their trade which can be seen as, in the possession of the ruins of Mehrgarh, were lapis lazuli beads made from Badakshan. This means that the Mehrgarh had a common communication with the settlements around them, it either be through speech or through pictures, they had some form that allowed them to trade.

All of these advancements put them further ahead of the settlements around them but, sadly, this would be the last period of growth for these people as in the coming millennials they faced the rise of the Indus River Civilization.

Sources used for this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehrg...nd_Period_III_.284800_BCE.E2.80.933500_BCE.29 - History on the Mehrgarh during this time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucible - What a 'crucible' is.
 
Last edited:
The Fall of the Mehrgarh Settlement and the Rise of a Civilization (3300 BC to 2800 BC)

3300 BC, the time where Ancient Egypts beginning the age of proto-writing, the Saharra Desert turns from a furtile plain into a barren desert, the time of a major climate change which froze 'Otzi' the ice man in a glacier and expanded countless glaciers across the world, pictographs and the face of an unknown Woman is made in Uruk, the creation of the Red Temple, the introduction of cattle and the domestication of wild ass* in the Egyptian Nile Valley, the introduction of the Potter's Wheel into the ancient Near East, the fall of the Mehrgarh and the rise of the Indus Valley Civilization.
Indus_Valley_Civilization,_Early_Phase_(3300-2600_BCE).png

A map of the Indus Valley Civilization at this time, property of Wikipedia.

At this time the Mehrgarh settlement started to be abandoned, decline, which the reason is pointed out to the fact that Mehrgarh isn't a lone advanced settlement now as the Indus Valley Civilization, to span along the whole Indus River and dubbed one of the 'Ancient East', has been introduced into the region as several villages in Sindh and Punjab. This short period, named the 'Early Harrappan Ravi Phase' after the Harappa settlement and the Ravi River, was not as productive as the Mehrgarh were but they did create proto-writing which, like proto-dentistry, is one of the earliest examples of writing.
IndusValleySeals.JPG

Indus Script seals (BACK THEN THE SWASTIKA WAS A SYMBOL OF PIECE, IN NO WAY WERE THEY THE ANCIENT NAZIS)

This form of proto-writing can be compared to the Ancient Egyptians which, like them, this proto-writing saw the use of symbols carved onto stone or other soft materials. It isn't writing as we know today but it is still a form of it that saw action in the early Indus Valley Civilization. It is still debated if this 'Indus Script' (the name for the proto-writing) does follow a language the Indus used or if it was just pictures for them. Like the Indus Script no one actually knows what language this civilization spoke and, as such, they just deemed this unknown language the 'Harappan Language'.

Like the Mehrgarh the early Indus did see trade, evidence was found to support this claim after they found raw materials in the settlements that were not local at all, a example being lapis lazuli. Strangely it seemed their highest import was materials for beads, God/Allah/other names for superior magical beings only know why.
Indus%20Jewel-18.jpg

Beads from the Indus Valley Civilization

Unlike their Mehrgarh ancestors they had crops that you could say have more in common with the crops we make today. This includes peas, sesame seeds, dates, and cotton among the other basic farming products. They also domesticated animals in their region, an example being the Water Buffalo.

As for the Mehrgarh the settlement was experiencing a less-than-marvelous time during this period. They experienced little in the ways of evolution, instead the settlement becoming abandoned in favor of the more fortified, better town called Nausharo five miles away which is part of the Indus Valley Civilization. This wasn't the end of Mehrgarh yet, but its downfall into darkness.

Sources used for this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilisation#Early_Harappan - History on the Indus Valley Civilization during this time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_script - Information on the Indus Writing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehrgarh#Mehrgarh_Periods_IV.2C_V_and_VI_.283500_BCE-3000_BCE.29 - History on the Mehrgarh during this time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harappan_language - Information on the Harappan Language.
 
Last edited:
The End of Mehrgarh and the Maturing of Harappan (2800 BC to 1800 BC)

Indus_Valley_Civilization,_Mature_Phase_(2600-1900_BCE).png

A map of the Indus Valley Civilization from 2800 BC to 1800 BC.

2800 BC, the Seated Harp Player is constructed from stone, the Second Dynasty Wars ravage in Egypt, the 365-day calendar is brought to Egypt, the start of the Old Kingdom of Egypt, the legend of the invention of tea by Shennong begins in China, the extinction of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture in modern-day Romania, Moldavia, and Ukraine, the end of the Early Dynastic I period and the beginning of the Early Dynastic II Period in Mesopotamia, the advancing of the Indus Valley Civilization, and the decline of Mehrgarh.

From 2800 BC to 2600 BC nothing much happened in either Mehrgarh or the Indus Valley Civilization to the extent that the modern excavations of their cities and settlements tell us. At 2600 BC the Mehrgarh settlement started to go into a decline, the population fleeing to the nearby fortified city of Nausharo, apart of the Indus Valley Civilization, only eight kilometers away from Mehrgarh (which would've been a long walk as they did not have horses or anything of that such). Those that did remain until the fall of the settlement at 2300 BC (although it is still debated it ended anywhere from 2600 BC to 2300 BC although 2300 BC is the most likely) continued to create pottery which declined in quality due to mass production and popularity due to the rise of bronze and copper vessels and the decline of clay vessels.

1754.1755.jpg

Pottery from Mehrgarh at 2600 BC.

The last sign of this civilization was at the Sibri cemetery eight kilometers away from Mehrgarh.

Meanwhile, at the Indus Valley Civilization they were experiencing many, many evolution in technology. They were the very first urban centers in the Sindh area, shown to have knowledge in urban planning and a government that put a high priority on hygiene and access to religious rituals. Along with that they were also advanced in the construction of these urban centers, creating sanitation systems (a.k.a. sewers) that were the first in the world, wells to obtain water with waste water being directed by covered drains along major streets. The houses evolved to support this new sanitation system, opening up only to smaller streets and inner courtyards. Their sanitary system was so advanced that it outmatched those found in the Middle East and, amazingly, even more efficient than some of the systems found in modern Pakistan and India. The sewage systems were not the only advanced part but also their architecture. Evidence of that is seen by their construction of impressive shipyards, granaries, warehouses, brick platforms, and massive, protective walls designed to protect against both floods and hostile military engagements. Their most massive structures were the citadels although their purpose is not yet known, having no connection to religion or the government itself. However, since they were protected by massive walls they have been suggested to be built to divert the flood waters or as a military fortification. The weird thing is that, unlike most if not every other civilization at that time, there is absolutely no evidence of temples having been made for religion or not even to a King, Queen, or Royal blood. This leads me to believe that Church and State were separate and that they were ruled by a more democratic government than a monarchy. Their largest structure that they did built was the 'Great Bath', a enormous public bath (although its official purpose is not yet known, all that is known is that it is indeed a bath). Although some houses were larger than others most were the similar if not the same size leading to the conclusion that the society is very egalitarianism which will be further discussed later. Back to sanitation, nearly almost every house had a flush toilet, not just a toilet, but a toilet that flushes attached to the sanitation system. Finally, over time the cities continue to get more dense and dense as the population grew.

The population around this time rose to be mainly traders and artisans. Living spaces seemed to have been filled with people of the same occupation rather than family unlike today arranged in well-defined neighborhoods. The traders brought materials home to construct the cities, beads, seals, and other objects made by laborers and artisans. Several types of merchandise could be found in the ruins of the cities including glazed faience beads, steatite seals with images of animals, people, among other things including the still un-deciphered Indus Valley Civilization language. The use of seals within the civilization have only been proven to be as stamps for trade goods although other uses are probable. Personal adornments were another good that was made in the region. Other trade that was more offland than inland was the pottery, seals, figurines, ornaments, and other items documenting, similar, and traded from Central Asia and the Iranian plateau.

How did they achieve this trade? With advanced technologies. This includes the wheeled carriages, one of the first in the world and debated to be the first in the world. This came in the form of Bullock carts of which allowed trade to extending to Afghanistan, coastal Persia, North and Western India, and Mesopotamia due to the presence of Indus artifacts in those region. They didn't just invest in land trade but also maritime trade, using small flat-bottom boats driven by either sail or oar similar to the ones still seen in the region today. This allowed trade to extend to Persia, Mesopotamia, Crete, and even (debated) Egypt. This only became possible to trade with Crete and Mesopotamia via boat as the flat-bottoms evolved to plank-built craft with a single mast supporting cloth of woven rushes. To help the coastal trade several coastal Indus settlements evolved on the coastline, becoming trading post for the merchants coming both from and too. Harbors were also found in shallow rivers capable of supporting most craft and even large canals such as Lothal turned into docks.

With all of this trade, one might think they got their food from other civilizations although that is not the case. Most if not all of their food was made indigenous, similar to the farming techniques and farming crops found at Mehrgarh.

1280px-Bullock_cart_in_Tamil_Nadu.jpg

A modern-day Bullock cart.

325px-Lothal_dock.jpg

The docks of the Indus Valley Civlization in Lothal used for trade.

The arts were another important part of this civilization was it was with most civilizations of this era. This included sculptures, bronze vessels (pottery), gold jewelry including necklaces, seals of animals, unknown animals (one seal has a image of a part bull and part zebra with a majestic horn) people, and Indus writing, and figurines in terracotta, bronze, and steatite. The most famous terracotta statues found here is also the strangest showing a dancing girl. Why is this strange? Well, this piece if anatomically correct which has never been seen until the discovery of it in the early arts. Other smaller crafts included shell working, ceramics, and steatite bead making. They also made toys, one being a die, with evidence of musical instruments by a harp-like stringed object being described on an Indus seal. Other items included toiletry and makeup, combs, the use of collyrium and a three-in-one toiletry gadget. Finally, the strangest seals ever found was of a person standing on its head and another in a 'yoga' position which has been assumed to be evidence of Hindu although it still isn't validated.

The language and writing system was the same as Mehrgarh, Harappan language and Indus script. Their religion is just as unknown as their language as, without the language, it is impossible for researchers to understand the religion. However, it has been suggested that there exists a 'Mother Goddess' and 'Father God' and there is the practice of the deification of animals and plants, the use of baths in religious practices, and is suggested to be the ancestor of Hindu due to the possible representation of a phallus and vulva.

Their technology was also advanced for their time. They had a uniform weights and measures providing great accuracy in measuring length, time, and even mass. Currently the smallest unit to have discovered and found by excavators is a ivory scale unit equalling 1.704mm which is the smallest unit ever to be in the bronze age. For weights, it varied on the size of the object (ex. we use grams for small objects and kilograms for larger) and was divided in units, each unit equalling 28 grams. However, the weights were not very uniform and tended to vary. Another place they evolved in is metallurgy, being able to produce copper, bronze, lead, and tin. Their engineering skill was also considered remarkable for their time, being able to construct magnificent docks and structures. Like Mehrgarh, they also invested in proto-dentistry which could've been brought to them after the Mehrgarh started to immigrate to the fortified town of Nausharo. Probably to prevent scamming they also had a touchstone used to test the purity of gold this artifact having been found with gold streaks along it.

Egalitarianism was another important part of this society, most if not every class being equal in their wealth. While everyone had housing and almost everyone had a working toilet, social wealth wasn't something that was fair shared along with personal items.

Finally, and the most mysterious part of this civilization, is the government. There is absolutely NO evidence of ANY form of government. However, there is evidence of complex decisions taking place along with the cities being uniform with uniform weights and measurements which can only be controlled by some form of government. As such there are several theories that have arose and are the following: there is a single state with the evidence being of the similarity in artifacts, planned settlements, standardized ratio of brick size, and the settlements being established near sources of raw materials. The next theory is that there is no single ruler but several where each city had its own ruler. The last theory is simply that there was no leader and everyone was a equal. Personally, I think there was a democratic society established over a single state due to the reasons for the 'single state theory' above and the fact that there is no evidence of church or state being connected along with no evidence of a monarchy. If I am right then Indus would be the earliest democratic society to have ever been found.


Sources used for this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilisation#Mature_Harappan - Information on the Indus from 2800 BC to 1800 BC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Bath,_Mohenjo-daro - Information on the 'Great Bath'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullock_cart - Telling me what a Bullock cart is.
 
Last edited:
I nominate the 'Indus Valley Civilization' as the best civilization to have exist, who agrees?

The Fall of the Harappan Civilization (1800 BC to 1000 BC)

1800 BC, the beginning of the Iron age in India, the start of the Nordic Bronze age, Troy flourishes in Europe, the Hyksos settle in the Nile Delta, the Mayan communities become inactive, and the decline of the Indus Valley Civilization.

Indus_Valley_Civilization,_Late_Phase_(1900-1300_BCE).png

The Indus Valley Civilization in its decline.

Similar to most things about the Indus Valley Civilization, why and how it declined is still a mystery as no hard evidence has yet to be found. What is known is the the decline happened between 1800 BC and 1700 BC, although the decline could've started as early as 1900 BC. By 1700 BC most cities were abandoned and the nation itself has fallen but some cities have remained. Those ones that remained stayed until around 1000 BC before, they too, were abandoned. Their are several theories on why and how it happened, one of them being the they migrated East which would explain the spike in settlements in the Gangestic Plain in 1900 to 1200 BC. The reason said for this ranges from climate change that forced people to migrates, cultural changes, an invasion by another power, disease, famine, drought, deforestation, and in general jus the instability of the area. If it is true that the climate shifted however, and thsi is supported the most, the climate that made the valley so great would've diverted to the Gangestic Plain due to tectonic activity which made the Plain the new place. With that the civilization fell into chaos but their influence was not over.

Across India the civilizations and religions has many similarities to theirs, an example being the Cemetery H culture and the Ochre Coloured Pottery culture. These two civilizations were not based on the valley, however, and were instead outward. This period was quick and short, mysterious and unknown, but there is still one city that went past 1000 BC, one city that became the lone Indus Valley Civilization.

Two other cultures that did exist in the former civilization however are the Jhukar culture and the Rangpur culture. While I can't find any information on these cultures once could guess that they were heavily similar to the Indus Valley Civilization and the Jhukar culture is the ancestor of the Cemetery H culture.

Sources used in this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilisation#Collapse_and_Late_Harappan - Used to find out about the last days of the civilization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cemetery_H_culture - Used to find out about the Cemetery H culture.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ochre_Coloured_Pottery_culture - Used to find out about the Ochre Coloured Pottery culture.
 
Last edited:
The Lone City and the Exchanging of Sindh (1000 BC to 700 AD)

1000 BC, a time when things were quiet and the cities of Indus were empty, except for one. This one city was Pirak.

The city itself sits on a mound 8 meters high, the area covering 12 acres in total. A important part of this city is the horse remains, leading to the conclusion that at the time of the city they did have the capability of horse transport by tamed horses. Around 1000 BC, as the rest of India also did, they started gradual production ironwork, creating artifacts from the material. The artifacts ranged from pottery to wheeled camel figures to ironworkings and seals. Around 1700 BC the pottery was decorated with applique bands and fingertip impressions, terrocotta horses and camels and the earliest horse remains were found at this time. Later they still had the same terrocotta figurines but with the addition of riders and people along with the first pieces of iron. From 1000 BC to the end of the settlement in 325 BC a greater number of ironworkings were made along with cereal. To feed the population they produced numerous crops including (mainly) rice, grapes, oats, chickpeas, barley, and sorghum. In order to water these plants a canal was made alongside them extending through the settlement with an irrigation system.

Further history of the region continues to get more complicated as several nations, groups, and people put their eyes on it. From 1000 BC to 600 BC the region was relatively quiet, the only population there being in tribes or the few still remaining in Pirak. Somewhere around 500 BC the Achaemenid Empire moved into Sindh, facing the tribes and population there. There is little information on what happened during the rule, one can only guess that their power as inserted rather harshly on the people of Sindh.

Around 450 BC the Ror dynasty begin, controlling the Northern regions of Sindh the Achaemenid Empire not entering the Northern territory of the region and apparently not challenging the dynasty and there is no information on the interactions, if any, that did occur during that time which means that this is either false information I gathered, they were a puppet or close to the Empire, or both of them simply didn't care about each other.

Around 330 BC, at the time of the Achaemenid Empire's collapse, being conquered by Alexander the Great, the region had a little rest before Alexander the Great led the Macedonian Greeks into Sindh and destroying Pirak. Like the Achaemenid invasion there is again little information on what happened and there is no information on how the Ror dynasty AGAIN survived. All that could be found is this quote of what Alexander said about the Sindhi people:

"I am involved in the land of lions and brave people, where every foot of the ground is like a well of steel, confronting my soldier. You have brought only one son into this world, but everyone in this land can be called an Alexander." - Alexander the Great

From that it can be assured that it was no easy task for Alexander to conquer this region, and if it is the Ror dynasty he speaks of it could be that he granted them to remain a nation under his watch.

The region only remained under Greek control for a few decades however and following Alexander's death it switched to the rule of the Seleucid Empire. Shortly after in 305 BC the rule got switched yet again to the rule by the Mauryan Empire which brought the Buddhist religion to the region. Yet again in 185 BC the rule was again switched as the Shunga Empire overthrew the control by the Mauryan Empire. Soon after, taking advantage of the disorder of the freed region the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom led by Demetrius I of Bactria led the forces into Sindh, conquering most of the Northern lands of Sindh and creating the Indo-Greco Kingdom which enforced Buddhism even more onto the population. The trading still didn't end with the Scythian Tribe bringing down the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom and then attempting to invade Indo-Greco Kingdom through Punjab which, upon failing, invaded through Sindh around 115 BC and became known as the Indo-Scythians. Around 1st century BC the Kushan Empire which is arguably the best out of all the invaders. Upon conquering they sponsored not only Buddhist but also local religious building projects, along with leaving the Abhira Tribe in Southern Sindh relatively alone. Of coures it didn't end there, around 350 AD the Kushan Empire was defeated and moved out of India by the Sassanid Empire which forced the people of Sindh to be their vassals (Kushanshahs). Around 475 AD the Empire was forced out by the Kidarite Kingdom only to be forced out themselves by the Gupta Empire shortly after. Finally, around 550 BC the Hephthalite Empire broke through the Gupta borders and overran Northern India, including Sindh, and seizing control.

At the same time the Ror Kingdom somehow managed to get past all of this, surviving from 450 BC until 489 AD. There is no information on what occured during that time except for the fact that there were 42 Kings in total. Even after that time it did survive after that in the form of the Rai Kingdom, the same Kingdom but different rulers. Unlike before there is some information about this period, such as the fact that during this time the heavily Buddhist nation created numerous temples for the religion. During this period there were four separate Emperors, and one major conflict...

This conflict came in the form of the Rashidun Caliphate setting its eyes on the coast of Makran which was, at the time, under Rai control. The decision of control came in the form of the Battle of Rasil in 644 between the Rai Kingdom and the Rashidun Caliphate. While the exact location isn't known it is believed to have happened on the Western bank of the Indus River. It is unknown of the strenghts and the losses of both armies, but is known that Raja Rasil (the battle named after him), Rai Sahasi II, and Rai Sahiras II fought for the Rai Kingdom while Suhail ibn Adi, Usman ibn Abi al-'as, and Hakam ibn Amr fought for the Rashidun Caliphate. The Rashidun Caliphate defeated the Rai Kingdom in battle, the Rai Kingdom retreating back to the Eastern bank, Sindh. However, the Rashidun did not move across the river due to this report of what the Sindh land is like:

"'O Commander of the faithful!

It's a land where the plaisn are stony; Where water is scanty; Where the fruits are unsavory; Where Men are known for treachery; Where plenty is unknown; Where virtue is held of little account; And where evil is dominant; A large army is less for there; And a less army is useless there; The land beyond it, is even worse."

Of which Umar, the Rashidun leader, asked if he was a poet and the messenger replying 'no'. Int he end Umar did not march his forces to conquer the rest of the Rai Kingdom and, as such, delayed the entrance of Islam.

290px-Mohammad_adil_rais-battle_of_rasil.PNG

Battle of Rasil

This was still the end of the Rai Kingdom as at 644 BC it fell as Chach of Alor rose to power. This was done in a way that is rather unethical as he married Rai Sahasi's wife making him part of the bloodline and effectively making him King in 632. However, it was not official yet and in 640 he was challenged by Rana Maharath, Sahasi's brother, and killed him through cheating. He was suppose to fight Rana with a sword in close combat and, seeing himself at a disadvantage, he jumped on a horse at the last second, breaking the rules, charged Rana and killed him as he severed his head from his body. He spread the Rai Kingdom throughout the region, in 644 facing the Rashidun Caliphate and loosing, and the dynasty renamed from the Rai dynasty to the Brahman dynasty.

Sindh_700ad.jpg

The Rai Kingdom under Chach of Alor.

Now you understand the reason I called this 'the Exchanging'.


Sources used in this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chach_Nama - Helped me find out about the Rai Kingdom under the rule of the Chachas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Rasil - Helped me find out about the battle of Rasil.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindh#Prehistoric_period - Helped me find out about this period of time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great - Helped me with the Greco incursions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chach_of_Alor - Helped me find out about Chach.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_campaign_of_Alexander_the_Great - Helped me with the Greco incursions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_dynasty - Helped me find out about the Rai Kingdom.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ror_dynasty - Helped me find out about the Ror Kingdom.
 
Last edited:
The Islamic Exchange of Sindh (700 AD to 1500 AD)

700 AD, the time of the Byzantine Empire and the Umayyad Caliphate. Sindh was still ruled by the Rai Kingdom but that is soon to change. Ruled by Raja Dahir, infamous like the other past Kings after Chach of Alor due to being Hindu rulers in a Bhuddist-majority country, had the pleasure of ruling the region from 679 AD to 712 AD. His rule ended in invasion and his life in battle, his line ended with the suicide of his family and the fall of the Rai Kingdom to the Umayyad Caliphate.

Muhammad bin Qasim, a General under the Umayyad Caliphate, led his force of 20,000 cavalry and 5 catapults into Sindh. His advances into the territory was unchallenged, as you may have guessed, as he enlisted the help of local tribes, fallen lords, and exiles to battle the Rai Kingdom. This came in the form of the rulers of Nerun, Bajhra Kaka Kolak and Siwistan assisting him as infantry along with the tribes of Meds and Bhuttos. There are several reasons said as to why the Caliphate decided to invade Sindh, the 'Chach Nama' details this as Sindh housed the son of the Prophet Muhammad which the Caliphate was trying to kill. The Son never reached Sindh, being captured and killed at Iraq, but that still caused concern for the Caliphate. As such they advanced into the region first taking over Debal, moving into Siwistan, the capturing the fort of Sisam. Upon reaching the Indus River they met with the Rai forces, led by Jaisiah (Dahir's son), determined to stop the advance. They battled but were ultimately defeated and the Caliphate continued their advance. They then reached Raor where they fought the last Rai forces led under Raja Dahir. Qasim and Dahir fought in this battle but Qasim was the ultimate victor. Following the Bhuddist Jauhar Dahir's wife and the other Women of his household immolated (sacrificed) themselves by suicide. After the invasion Qasim constructed the city of Mansura as the capital of the region.

the_umayyad_caliphate_under_al_walid_i_by_solrac1993-d5htbhv.png

The Umayyad Caliphate at its height.

With that the region was under the Umayyad Caliphate's control and remained their easternmost region up until around 750 AD. During that period there were several famous figures that rose from this region including Abu Mashar Sindhi, a scholar of Hadith literature, Abu Raja Sindhi, a scholar of Hadith, Quran and Arab literature, and Sind ibn Ali a engineer, astronomer, translator, and mathematician. Debal, a port Sindh int he region,turned into a mainly Islamic city with the Bawarji pirates converting. After Qasim left the region to attend to other events the Umayyad Caliphate controled the region through the Habbari dynasty.

Around 750 AD the Abbasid and Umayyad Caliphate struggled for power (the Abbasid ultimately winning and becoming dominant over the former Umayyad Caliphate) the Habbari became a semi-independent state. However this did not last long as soon after the dust has cleared Mansura was invaded by Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi around 1120 AD under the Ghaznavid Empire. The Habbari fell and the region as then under the control of the Abbasid Caliphate as their easternmost state. This time saw Sindh being focused on by geographers and historians, travelers alike to speak of the region as a region under the name of Sindh. Up until 1258 AD the region was ruled by the Soomro dynasty.

The-Abbasid-CaliphateMap01.jpg

The Abbasid Caliphate.

After the Siege of Baghdad in 1258, the invasion of the Abbasid capital by the Mongols and ultimately a Mongol victory, the Soomro dynasty ended and the Soomra dynasty began. This occurred due to the Soomro dynasty becoming disconnected from the Caliphate and allowing the Soomra dynasty to take control around 1300 AD. During this time they were the first to translate the Quran to Sindhi and formed close ties with the Samma dynasty of Kutch. Sadly their isolation came with a price as, without the Caliphate support, the Sultans of Delhi set their eyes on the region. For 36 years they defended their territory only falling in 1351 to the larger armies of the Sultans.

69617beb36df701c674fa20bf30ebfce_nocrop.jpg

The Soomra dynasty at its height.

In 1339 the Jam Unar founded the Muslim Rajput Samma dynasty and challenged the Sultans of Delhi. This period is confusing as little information is on of it, no information on how the Samma dynasty spread through Sindhi and kicked the Delhi out. All the information there is that during the reign of Jam Nizamuddin II, 1461 to 1509 AD, he expanded the dynasty to spread across the entirety of the region and established Thatta as the new capital replacing Debal. During this period they made were legendary for their architecture, art, and music along with respecting the native Sindh arts. However, some parts of the region were still under the control by the Delhi and Arghuns and Tarkhans which butchered the Sindh Amirs and Mirs along with sacking Thatta during the reign of Jam Ferozudin.

Ancient_Khorasan_highlighted.jpg

The Samma dynasty at its height.

Their rule would continue until 1524.


Sources used for this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindh#Arrival_of_Islam - Used for the whole thing, sources branch off from this page.
 
Last edited:
The Lone City and the Exchanging of Sindh (1000 BC to 700 AD)

Cool! I'm learning a lot about a part of the world that few people ever think about. Keep up the good work!
 
The Arrival of the Mughal Empire (1524 AD 1783 AD)

1524 AD, the time of the Mughal. A new Empire they strived to absorb all of India (which they almost did) and unite the people within the nation (totally not a Team Rockets reference).

In 1524 the Mughal Empire arrived to Sindh and rather than a rough absorbtion into the Empire the few remaining Sindh Amirs welcomed the arrivals. This was not the same for the Arghuns and Tarkhans however, them having to be absorbed by force as Babur (the ruler of the Mughal Empire) wanted the region. It can only be speculated as to why Sindh didn't put up a fight but if I could guess it is because of this: Sindh is use to be ruled by Empires and, instead of being put through by force, would rather be put through by their own choice. This turned out to be a good choice as Sindh and the Mughal Empire enjoyed very good relations to one another to the point where, in the following centuries, a network of forts manned by cavalry and infantry would be made.

Mughal_Historical_Map.png

The Mughal Empire through the ages.

It didn't last long however, in 1540 Sher Shah Suri took control of the Mughal Empire through a mutiny and renamed it the Sur Empire effectively loosing all influence in Sindh. However, the former Mughal Emperor Humayun fled to Sindh where he joined the Sindhi Emir Hussein Umrani and married Hamida Banu Begum in 1541. In 1545 Sher Shah Suri died accidentally (karma) at the siege at the Kalinjar fort of Rajputs where he was hit by his own gunpowder explosion while trying to blow the wall of the fort to bits. The explosion caused severe damage to his body and he died the same day, him being succeeded by his son Jalal Khan (now we just need Kirk) and took the title of Islam Shah Suri.

India_under_Sher_Shah.png

The Sur Empire at its peak.

In 1555 Humayun returned to India and seized the throne yet again, the Mughal Empire returned. However, like Sher Shah Suri in 1545, died of a fatal accident the 1556 where he had his arms full of books descended down the staricase of the library. The meuzzin then called the Azaan (pray) and as such Humayun tried to kneel in order to pray but instead caught his foot on his robe, tumbled down the steps as he slipped, and hit his temple on a stone edge. He died three days later and was attempted to be buried Purana Quila but failed due to an attack by the Hemu, sent to Kalanaur where he was coronated, and finally buried in his tomb at Delhi.

He was then succeeded by his son, Akbar who was born in Umarkot in 1542. During his reign he expanded the Empire to include Sindh and all of North India. In Sindh scholars such as Mir Ahmed Nasrallah Thattvi, Tahir Muhammad Thattvi a poet, Mir Ali Sir Thattvi a historian, and Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak a Mughal chronicler who wrote the 'Akbarnama' (the life of Akbar) and the 'Ain-i-Akbari' (about the Mughal administration). Not only did they produce famous scholars but Sindh literature also flourished with figures such as Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai a scholar, saint, mystic, and poet, Sulatn-al-Aoliya Muhammad Zaman a saint and poet, and Sachal Sarmast a poet becoming known throughout the land.

Shah Jahan, the 5th Mughal Emperor, visited Sindh in 1603 and was treated with respect among the locals after the death of his father Jahangir, the 4th Mughal Emperor, in which he then constructed the Shahjahan Mosque under the supervision of Mirza Ghazi Beg. In 1659 Muhammad Salih Tahtawi of Thatta a metallurgist, astronomer, geometer and craftman created a seamless celestial globe with Arabic and Persian inscriptians using the wax casting method.

Yet another famous aspect of Sindh were its traders, a famous one being Mir Bejar of Sindh who his so wealthy that he attracted the attention of the Sultan bin Ahmad of Oman.

In 1701 Nawab Kalhora was authorized to rule Sindh as a subah in a firman by the 6th Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. Then from 1752 to 1762 the Maratha Empire (credited to ending the Mughal Empire) started to collect tribute from Sindh after spreading over much of the Mughal Imperial land. However in 1761 at the Third Battle of Panipat between the Maratha Empire and the King of Afghanistan, Rohilla Afghans of Doab, Shuja-ud-Daula, and Nawab of Awadh the Marathas influence over the region declined to nothing by 1762. In 1762 Mian Ghulam Shah Kalhoro of the Kalhora dynasty brought stability to Sindh, forced the Martha Empire out of the region, and defeated them and their vassal independently. They didn't stop there, when the Sikhs dared to take Multan the Kalhora stepped in once again and supported counterattacks against them.

However, it came to an end in 1783 once Mir Fateh Ali Khan Talpur became the new 'Nawab of Sindh' in a firman and brought peace to the land after the Battle of Halani and the defeat of the Kalhora dynasty by the Talpur baloch tribes.

Sources used in this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindh#Mughal_era - Used to find out everything, sources branch off from here.
 
Last edited:
The Talpur tribes of Sindh (1783 AD to 1835 AD)

The Battle of Halani, 1782. The Talpur tribe and the Baloch tribe, the Baloch indengious to Sindh and the Talpur having migrated from Punjab. There is little about the details of this battle, the battle between the Talpur and Baloch versus the Kalhora dynasty. All that is known is that Mir Fateh Ali Khan Talpur led the Talpur and Baloch forces against the Kalhora led by Mian Abdul Nabi Kalhoro which ultimately the Talpur and Balochs won and the Talpur dynasty began.

Like the battle there is little known, in fact I couldn't even find anything about them except that their government is a 'nobility' or 'Mir' government.

This brings us to 1835.


Sources used in this section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talpur_dynasty - Used to find out what the nation after the Kalhora dynasty is called.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talpur - Used to find out about the Talpur.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baloch_people#Baloch_tribes - Used to find out about the Baloch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sindh#Talpurs - Used to find out about the Talpur rule.
 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions: