The division of Gaul

[TheArchduke]

If all are modest, things will be fine, if one gets greedy, things will get difficult.

 

[artemis667]

If all are modest, things will be fine, if one gets greedy, things will get difficult.

Maybe events 200393, 200394, and 200395 should be changed - based on what the nations do in the first event. For example, if only Burgundy is greedy but not the other two, then Brittany and Savoy will get cores on Burgundy, but not each other And so on...

The tension in MP will be fascinating, will all the nations be greedy, or only one? If one nation is greedy, one could expect the other two to ally and wipe it off the face of the earth

Or of course, all nations might be greedy, or just two (which would have the same effect). That would of course be an all-out brawl.

 

[TheArchduke]

Hmm, I rather keep the current one, if one get´s greedy the whole thing escalates.

 

[artemis667]

Hmm, I rather keep the current one, if one get´s greedy the whole thing escalates.

Well, the thing would escalate anyway - but it would mean that the countries that weren't greedy wouldn't be so threatened by each other, just by the greedy one, and would react appropriately

 

[unmerged(21937)]

Maybe some relation penalty could be included so that the one going greedy first would hurt his relations to the other two, while the others reacting to it wouldn't hurt their relations at each other.

 

[Slargos]

Ah. The old prisoner's dilemma..