- Dec 14, 1999
- 22.085
- 263.936
I really don't understand the criticism that one has to have everything under control else it's not a game, you're a king, not a god that could lose legitimacy to a province only after being dogpiled and ostracized by the rest of humanity, you can gain provinces by inheritance, why not lose them? Imo DHE are what eu4 lacks, they're like stellaris' Anomalies, give flavor to the plate you're cooking for the 38268292 time. I can understand that eu2 was too heavy on hardcoded choices for some, but i thought that the burgundian succession crisis showed the way to follow to ensure a historical and funny experience...
It is not a sacred word, it just doesn't fit at all with what i was saying, hence why i was asking you if you know what it means, i wasn't offended at all just didn't expect it lol.
@Johan i had the feeling that eu4 didn't inherit the major part of the events from eu2, if you say that it's only 10% what has been lost, then i prolly played too much AGCEEP and fused it into the game, it must be so because i remember the game had more events, but now i'm pretty unsure what was vanilla and what was agceep.
@Johan...will paradox allow darkest hour/aod/ftg devs to develop a paid dlc if they wish (dunno if they wish)...just want a paradox perspective.