I have heard a lot of conflicting stories concerning the Nazi efforts to construct atomic devices in WW2. For example, I've heard that they abandoned plans for the A-bomb due to a calculating error by Heisenberg. Instead they supposedly concentrated on research into the H-bomb, which is why they produced heavy water in Norway. Other theories state that new versions of the V-2 were intended as carriers for either the H-bomb or a kind of melt-down uranium bomb code-named "Virus House". The nuclear armed V-2s would be launched from U-boats or special pods towed by U-boats. Even more powerful ICBM versions were also contemplated.
However, I've never seen any convincing evidence for any of this. (Except that submarine rocket launches were indeed planned.) On the other hand, it seems beyond doubt that the Germans were researching nuclear reactors. This also explains their use of heavy water, since they were using it as a moderator (erroneously believing graphite to be inferior). The Heisenberg counting error appears to be a myth though:
http://www.bullatomsci.org/issues/1992/s92/s92.goldberg.html
(This is an excellent article BTW, but it does not answer all questions.)
Does anyone know of any kind of evidence at all that the Nazis were in fact developing anything more lethal than nuclear reactors?
However, I've never seen any convincing evidence for any of this. (Except that submarine rocket launches were indeed planned.) On the other hand, it seems beyond doubt that the Germans were researching nuclear reactors. This also explains their use of heavy water, since they were using it as a moderator (erroneously believing graphite to be inferior). The Heisenberg counting error appears to be a myth though:
http://www.bullatomsci.org/issues/1992/s92/s92.goldberg.html
(This is an excellent article BTW, but it does not answer all questions.)
Does anyone know of any kind of evidence at all that the Nazis were in fact developing anything more lethal than nuclear reactors?