wars of the roses

[unmerged(4974)]

I think this event probably needs a little work. If the player chooses a yorkist or a straight lancaster, there shouldn't be an alternation of kings (except maybe a Warwick or other intermediary random event?), but maybe higher rebellions or something? Also, if there is an alternation, the leaders from the other side should go to sleep. Finally, if Richard III wins, maybe he should have a yorkist successor. Say an Edward VI who rules from 1509-1553 (say Richard re-married and had a son in 1491!), and maybe even making it a catholic monarchy.

Just some ideas.

Nathan

 

[Johnny Canuck]

There has been some significant discussion about greatly expanding the War of the Roses in EU2. Last I heard, Gnome was working on about 31 events to simulate the WotR. I think the discussion of these changes is in the "Slowing Down Human Played England."

 

[Gnome]

Sorry - I've been working on another scenario lately (and seeing how much of Europe I can get with France just through Dipannexing. It's a lot .

Patch 1.03 should sort out the problems in my proposed events - it seems almost tailor made for cumlumative revoltrisks. The event for Richard of York's regency needs changing (the way the rules work now it will no longer work) it needs splitting into 2 events - one starting the regency and one ending it.

There are also some "lhs on line so-and-so" errors that I have found impossible to track down. I'll keep trying. Anyway - have a look at the old threads, its called "Slowing down the human England" and its probably on the second page or so - it comes after a lot of new events for English dominated France.