I vaguely remember reading that some of the conditions in event scripting weren't working right in 1.02... is this true?
M
M
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
condition type has_improvement (and possibly other has_* conditions) don't work if you check for lack of an improvement by:
This always returns true. To get it to work right, you have to test for the presence of an improvement then invert it with not:
Some types that event_effects.txt say take targets don't; specifically prestige, piety and gold, at least as effects; I'm not sure if they have been tested as conditions.
ai_chance doesn't work the way you would expect; it has a range of -1 to 9 rather than 0 to 100, but that goes in effects, not conditions.
That's all I can think of off the top of my head; any others?
Code:
condition = {
type = has_improvement
value = { church = no }
}
Code:
condition = {
type = not
value = {
type = has_improvement
value = { church = yes }
}
}ai_chance doesn't work the way you would expect; it has a range of -1 to 9 rather than 0 to 100, but that goes in effects, not conditions.
That's all I can think of off the top of my head; any others?
add_next_advance seems to give the same top advance for the moment 
o (but that's a broken effect).
Cat
o (but that's a broken effect).Cat
I think I found something else that is irksome... "for =" statements don't seem to work for the following... there may be more
effect = { type = prestige for = worst_courtier value = -50 }
effect = { type = intrigue for = random_courtier value = 3 }
effect = { type = diplomacy for = best_courtier value = -1 }
surprisingly,
effect = { type = martial for = worst_courtier value = -1 }
has given me no problems whatsoever.... strange...
M
effect = { type = prestige for = worst_courtier value = -50 }
effect = { type = intrigue for = random_courtier value = 3 }
effect = { type = diplomacy for = best_courtier value = -1 }
surprisingly,
effect = { type = martial for = worst_courtier value = -1 }
has given me no problems whatsoever.... strange...
M
Could you report this one in the bug forum, please ?
I'll investigate...
Thanks,
Cat
I'll investigate...
Thanks,
Cat
Cat Lord said:
I am going to do a bit of investigating myself... so I can report the problem as completely as possible... a bug report from me will be coming shortly...
M