When making a separate peace, why aren't battles taken into account for warscore?

[Devildude4427]

I'm at war with both France & Sweden, with Sweden holding the war goal. For some reason that I don't understand, warscore from battles against France only affect the overall warscore, not the warscore against them personally. The only thing that counts is the provinces of theirs that I've sieged down.

As such, there's no way to get them out of the war other than doing a tedious occupation of their nation, they don't care how many battles I win against them. This makes no sense to me.

 

[Reni Malaj]

Which battles would be taken into account and which wouldnt? Just occupy the capital; that skews the acceptance by a lot.

 

[Devildude4427]

Which battles would be taken into account and which wouldnt?

Er, the battles they've participated in...? I would think that would be obvious.

Just occupy the capital; that skews the acceptance by a lot.

Doesn't give 40% warscore like battles can.

If the an enemy is constantly getting their armies obliterated they'd want out, but no, there's apparently a bug in the logic which means only sieges count for separate peace warscore.

 

[Reni Malaj]

Er, the battles they've participated in...? I would think that would be obvious.

Thats very hard to implement with multiple participants.

If the an enemy is constantly getting their armies obliterated they'd want out, but no, there's apparently a bug in the logic which means only sieges count for separate peace warscore.

Thats what war exhaustion and army size are for.

 

[Devildude4427]

Thats very hard to implement with multiple participants.

Nope. The game already tracks battle participation as it is (factors into war participation). These variables already exist and are populated.

Thats what war exhaustion and army size are for.

Neither contribute to war score so I think you're confused.

 

[Nikolai II]

Neither contribute to war score so I think you're confused.

Both contribute to peace acceptance.