Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Why not combine CK and EU?

TheRomanRuler · 2014-11-13T00:01:25+00:00

Why not combine these 2 games? I can`t think of any reason besides need for a new game. Europa Universalis 5: Dynasty does not sound too bad either. Crusader Kings sounds pretty great tough, would be shame to loose that. Hm, i guess name is not only issue :blush: ? De Jure could be dealt with cores, many think EU4 needs family tree, so why not just immedietely go full in? In early game it would work like in CK2, but in late game importance would be reduced, but coups and assasinations are still part of the politics today, but ATM they are completely missing in EU4. CK2 on other hand does not have idea system and many other systems, like something for Holy Roman Empire, in game it is just 1 united nation with loose leadership. Levy system would be perfect for later Napoleonic era that EU4 includes, just with added manpower system from EU4. Retinues are pretty much same as building forces in EU4 etc... Why not? :excl: And no, i am not going to suggest why not combine Victoria 2 and EU4, or Vic2 and HOI4, those would be way too different.

Thread starter TheRomanRuler
Start date Nov 13, 2014

Jump to latest Follow Reply

We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.

Status: Not open for further replies.

Show all posts

Ofaloaf

Content Designer

Paradox Staff

76 Badges

Nov 18, 2014

Add bookmark
#24

How are CK2's character-driven mechanics supposed to work with colonization? How are dynasties and trade companies supposed to mesh? Are parliaments just going to be ignored?

Show hidden low quality content

Status: Not open for further replies.

Facebook X (Twitter) Reddit Tumblr WhatsApp Link

Top Bottom

Back