• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Another question: Is 'Sigurd Håkonsson Ladejarl' earl of Trondheim in this timestamp?

The Lade-dynasty held this title for several generations (often just refered to as the 'Ladejarls'), and one of them, Håkon, ended up ruling entire Norway from 970-995 with no king above him and is known as a fierce anti-christian, so it would be interesting to see the dynasty added.

Yes, he is. And I've set his son Hakon to have been born in 936 (with the Sturdy trait) as well. So feel free to play out your Lade dreams.
 
Wow, I am VERY excited for this patch and the new bookmark.

I do have a question though - is there any plans to change the coat of arms of England for the bookmarks before 1066? The Three Lions don't look quite right for Saxons, a Wyvern would be much preferred. Considering the mechanics exist in the game to change coats of arms for certain rulers and start dates, why hasn't this already been done?

Honestly, I feel like this is the case with a lot of titles. It is just a side-effect of having a really poor static CoA system, which makes several CoAs a hassle to deal with. I don't disagree with you though, it would be nice having another CoA for pre-Bastard England.

Will Sigurd Ladejarl be set as Close Friend to Håkon the Good? Would be nice if he was also given custom stats, and a 0 year old son (Håkon, future de facto ruler of Norway).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigurd_Haakonsson

Yes. What's up with all the Norwegians all of a sudden (and I am saying this as a Norwegian myself)

Poland will feudal or tribal at this bookmark?

Tribal.

Any chance of seeing elevated Manichaeism, or the previously-discussed Celtic paganism? :)

No idea for the future, but definitely not for this specific update.
 
Any chance of seeing elevated Manichaeism, or the previously-discussed Celtic paganism? :)

No idea for the future, but definitely not for this specific update.

Boo, Irish paganism would be great. For the nay-sayers just have it use the same game rule as Hellenic.

While we're at it, throw Kemetic in there, you've already got pyramids.
 
Will Sardinians (if not in this patch, then in the general future):

-have the same access as Italian and Greek, to delve into the classics?

-use Italian graphics?

-have unique retinue?


The Quarmatians could benefit from a special republican government. Sardinians too could have an interesting government for the earlier start dates.

Though i understand that you developers have limited time and resources (yet you accomplish so much) i hope these could be address if you'd ever consider a deepening of republics in general. :3

- Good idea, I'll add them.
- Yes
- Yes
 
Could we please stop adding dead religions for meme value
Especially druidism, at the least hellenism and khemetic faiths we know enough about to give mechanics to. We know next to nothing about the British celtic faith and all we do have is written by roman sources. Heresies need fleshing out both orthodox and Islam could use an overhaul can we talk about druidism after that happens? If we must have more pagans what about the daylamites, that at least is historically justifiable

I've never heard of the Daylamites, who were they?
 
This talk about retinues made me remember that Alans don't have a special one. I know it has nothing to do with the discussion but could you add one to them? I think they were just forgotten.

It's too late to add them for the Iron Century update, but I'll see if I can add them after the patch.