• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Dev Diary #172 - The Full Medieval World

Hello and welcome to this first development diary about the upcoming All Under Heaven DLC, and its associated update! I am Trin Tragula, one of the design leads on Crusader Kings III and today I get to talk about East Asia in the middle ages!

This diary is going to be a high level one, where we look at the vision for the entire expansion and all we aim to do in it. It will be followed by many more detailed diaries for the features and the individual regions of the expansion.

image_01.png

[A first look at the world of Crusader Kings with everything between the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean. Like everything else in this diary the map is work in progress and subject to change; this includes coloring of the map itself, which is something we are experimenting a bit with right now. Don’t hesitate to tell us what you think of it!]

Apart from being Grand Strategy Games, the Paradox games have, for me personally, always also been a way to discover the entire world in a given time period, something that is both a game and a travel guide to the past. With this update, CK will finally get rid of the last artificial barriers to that kind of experience, as the map will no longer arbitrarily end in Burma and Tibet. This lets us shine a spotlight on some of the most interesting states of the time period, such as Tang and Song China, Heian Japan, Angkor, and many others.

With All Under Heaven, we want to not just add the missing parts of the map but also fill it with the living world of the past. The goal is that the new part of the map should feel like an integral part of the game. This means new governments with their own features, but it also means things like special buildings, new cultural traditions, and visual variety. East Asia will have its own look, with event illustrations, clothes, ethnicities, holdings, throne rooms, artifacts, and much more.

image_02.png


As a final word of this introduction: this is also a work in progress. This is a vision and an overview of what we are making, but development is an iterative process and so this diary is also an opportunity for you to give your input on the things we are looking to add. More details are also forthcoming for each and every thing here in the coming diaries but there is nothing stopping you from telling us already if there are things you think we should include or change. This goes for art, features, and even the map itself.



China

A central focus of an East Asian expansion, by virtue of its sheer size as well as the reach and impact of its influence and culture, has to be China. While it was in a very different situation in 867, 1066 and 1178 respectively, China remains both a state that others emulated and a political constant in all of these dates.
We will talk a lot more about China and its features in future diaries, but here is a short overview of what we have planned and how we see its purpose.

Hegemony - A New Title Tier

Since China is a de jure realm that is more expansive than any one of the empires we currently have in the game, we are adding a new title tier for it - a Hegemony. In all our start dates, China is the only existing Hegemony, but others can be created using the decisions we have for uniting India or Rome. For now, there is no generic way to create these super-empires, and beyond China there are no de-jure ones. Instead, we reserve its use for special cases with bespoke rules and justifications.

image_03.png


Celestial Government & Merit

China was a bureaucratic state, and though it differed a bit depending on era, positions in government as well as in provincial administration were largely given to career officials based on their perceived merit. Thousands would take the imperial examinations in order to start their career in public service, leading to possibly the most well-educated government apparatus in the world.

In All Under Heaven, the Hegemony of China has a special type of government called the Celestial Government. It builds on the Administrative Government introduced in Roads to Power for the Byzantine Empire. House heads and governors are playable, and can build up Influence and acquire positions, while families have a domicile representing their permanent powerbase that they can build up over time.
Where the Byzantine governors are solely appointed based on spending Influence however, the Chinese system relies more closely on Merit. Merit is a value that you build up during a lifetime in public service, through serving in important jobs and taking good decisions. Merit cannot be spent like a currency, instead it is how you are compared to other applicants for any position. A high merit score might mean you can become a circuit (kingdom) tier governor, or even a minister in the central government. Merit does not replace Influence since Influence can still be earned and spent for more underhanded uses, even in a Celestial realm.

image_04.png


In order to ensure a healthy crop of potential administrators at all times, the Empire will regularly host examination activities where the applicants can earn a base merit score (or even a higher one) by demonstrating their skills at the Confucian classics, literary style, and essay writing.
The Emperor, on the other hand, can control what skills are prioritized in the examinations by controlling the curriculum when hosting Exams. Whatever qualities are emphasized will shape which characters are likely to be able to become governors in the future.

The Imperial Treasury

Governors in China will not support themselves using the money from the region they govern. Instead they will send the funds upwards, to the Emperor and his central treasury. The emperor then pays out a salary (gold) to the governor but also assigns funds to the respective treasury of all governorships in the realm.
Only gold can be spent on personal expenses, such as building up your family estate, paying for tutorship for your children, and so on. Treasury is what is used for any expenses related to governing. This includes things like building buildings, paying troops, or disaster relief.

Like with everything in this diary, there will be more information about the treasury, including details around how money can be put into or taken out of it by characters, in a future China-centric Developer Diary.

The Dynastic Cycle

Chinese history is traditionally ordered by the dynasty currently in power. This is a phenomenon that goes far back in time, where often a new dynasty would prioritize writing the history of their predecessors. They would use the imperial archives to chart out and describe how the old dynasty rose, how they ruled and how they eventually lost their way and succumbed to corruption (leaving an opening for the new dynasty to save the day and restore order and propriety).
In our timeline, the Tang, once a very successful and expansive dynasty that ruled a vast and prosperous realm, are already troubled by 867. About 40 years from this start date, their dynasty would break into a multi-factional civil war known as the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Era. Eventually the Song took power and built a new dynasty based even more strongly on the principles of bureaucracy and internal development.
The Song were eventually replaced by the Yuan dynasty of Kublai Khan, who ruled a China that was unmistakably Chinese, but also still very Mongol dominated. The Yuan and other foreign dynasties are often referred to as Conquest Dynasties due to their different nature (at least initially).


image_05.png



In All Under Heaven, we have taken inspiration from how the Chinese described this at the time, a Dynastic Cycle where China can be in a stable era, essentially a type of golden age, where it can build its wealth and progress orienting themselves outwards (like the Tang), focusing on military expansion and a vast tributary network. Another focus can be advancing the core region, with great building projects, economic development, innovation and a strong bureaucracy (more like the Song or later Ming).
Common to both types of Stable eras (Expansion and Advancement) is that they can go on for a very long time. As long as the rulers put the right people in positions of government, protect their subjects from invasions and act swiftly against natural disasters, they are able to draw on the resources of China to perform great things. The eras come with different possibilities and rules for how to achieve these goals. In this way China’s neighbors will also know what to expect from the neighboring behemoth.

Common to both stable eras is that how Legitimacy is built and maintained relates to you moving in alignment with the era. If your dynasty has chosen an Expansion era then your Legitimacy will suffer if you fail to expand and will be even more damaged if outsiders take land or raid your lands.

With the ruling dynasty faltering, the cycle will eventually proceed to the Unstable Era. This is an era with its own rules and impact, just like the two stable variants, but here it is mainly to signify a period of change. Here people have begun to question the mandate of the rulers, and every action they take is under closer scrutiny. Natural disasters, wars, and other things will be viewed in a much more negative light, especially if the central government is unable to act quickly on them. Governors will be less selfless and may not take their responsibilities to the center as seriously, instead preparing for their own future.
Should the Emperor’s Legitimacy be impacted strongly enough, this era is very likely to slide into a Chaotic Era, where the ruling dynasty will fracture into a multi-factional civil war, much like what happened in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Era.

Should the ruling dynasty, on the other hand, navigate the unstable era well enough and emerge on the other side, then they will once again enter a stable era and be able to choose between Advancement and Expansion once more. In the 867 bookmark the Tang starts in the unstable era.

In the Chaotic Era, the Hegemony of China title is suspended while the various empires, kingdoms and duchies in the Chinese realm are splintered into separate realms. These will quickly try to form their own dynasties, in conflict with each other. Once a winner emerges China will once again enter a stable phase, and the new ruling dynasty will be seen to have the Mandate of Heaven to rule the restored Hegemony of China. This will mean choosing a type of stable era as well as taking some other decisions about your long term goals (including what capital to use and the traditional name and color to associate with your dynasty).

There is much more to be said about the Dynastic Cycle, including how your bureaucrats coordinate to push for trying to change the current type of era, and how it deals with foreign conquest dynasties, but most of that will have to wait for a future diary of its own.

Tributaries and China

For the Chinese Empire, tributaries are not at all what they are to the rulers in the steppe. Independent rulers can choose to enter a relationship with China and be legitimized by trappings of authority from China. The tributary is not expected to play any part in China’s wars, and China will also not defend its tributaries as a general rule, it will however be less likely to be attacked directly.

Tributaries can attempt to create a closer relationship with their Suzerain Hegemon by going on Tributary missions to the Chinese court, bringing gifts, goods, eunuchs, and other things to please the Emperor. In return they may receive economic benefits, legitimizing artifacts or progress towards Chinese innovations.



Japan

One of the more unique regions of the medieval world is Japan. In our timeline (covering 867-1453 AD), Japan is originally a state that is largely inspired by the Chinese way of doing things, with governors who do not directly own land, and a vibrant capital in Kyoto. Noble families play a bigger part in ceremony, fine arts, and intrigue than they do in China, but military campaigns tend to be small and directed at the Ainu or Emishi in the eastern part of the island rather than other families in the realm.
Over time, some nobles manage to install themselves in hereditary fiefs, and the country starts undergoing a gradual militarization, culminating in the establishment of something much closer to the feudal realms of the west.

Soryō and Ritsuryō - Two Types of Vassals in One Realm

Unlike Administrative realms, where governorships are generally duchies, (and unlike China where they can be any tier) Japanese governorships are generally counties. This means power is a lot more fragmented than it is in other realms.

In 867 and 1066, the vast majority of counties are held by Ritsuryō rulers - a government very similar to Administrative - while by 1178 most of Japan is ruled by local Soryō lords - more akin to Feudal.

Ritsuryō rulers use Influence to secure appointments and generally don’t have strong armies (unless enabled by their House-related bonuses as described below).

Soryō vassals, on the other hand, have gained de facto control of a region from the central state and made it a permanent fief. Their succession is hereditary, their armies are stronger, and they can more easily expand militarily to control multiple counties. Soryō vassals can be useful to the empire in times of war, but generally they are a liability and a Ritsuryō that tries to turn their governorship into a Soryō fief will be considered a criminal.

House Relations & Blocs

The long-term relationships between different Houses are now tracked, and move along a sliding scale from great friendship to intense rivalry. Whenever a member of a House takes a significant friendly or hostile action against another House’s member, such as a marriage or a murder, the relation between the Houses will change to reflect the act.

image_06.png


In Japan, houses can also form Blocs. These are groups of houses that all follow the head of one house, largely based on house relations. A bloc is a military alliance that is represented on the map, similar to steppe confederations, though with a clear leader and more far-reaching responsibilities. Bloc members will join the factions and wars of their leader (offensive as well as defensive). This means that when wars break out in Japan they are not as limited despite the fragmented political situation.

The Emperor and the Kampaku

In our era, the Japanese Emperors had varying degrees of power, but were generally relegated to a more ceremonial role than many of their foreign counterparts. The de facto ruler of Japan in all but name is usually the Kampaku, a Ritsuryō bureaucrat who rules on the Emperor’s behalf.

The succession of the Kampaku is determined in a similar way to the Byzantine Emperor’s acclamation, but with a different set of weights (favoring among other things marriage ties with the imperial family).
The Emperor, or Ten’nō, still has great ceremonial importance and is playable, but only directly rules his own family manor in all our start dates. Like many of the noble families in Japan, he resides in the imperial capital of Kyoto.

image_07.png


Only Ritsuryō rulers may become Kampaku by appointment, but Soryō rulers can take the top job if they can build a powerful enough Faction, and thus establish themselves as a Shōgun (the Soryō equivalent of a Kampaku) by force. The Emperor themselves can also aspire to the top position and, if appointed as Kampaku, is given the option to abdicate the imperial throne and rule as a cloistered emperor, representing periods of strong royal influence.

Since the Kampaku, or Shōgun, essentially acts as the top liege in the Japanese realm, they wield an enormous amount of power, and will also make use of special Imperial Policy laws to control what can and cannot be done by vassals in the realm. Should a Shōgunate be established by a Soryō ruler this will start to usher in a societal change with more and more of the vassals in Japan forming Soryō fiefs.

Japanese Houses

With most vassals in Japan starting out holding just one county, there is a great need for other ways to build permanent power. The family manor, which is available to both Soryō and Ritsuryō rulers, is one way to build up durable power, and Japanese rulers will have many unique manor buildings for this purpose. Costs and benefits are both modified to better fit the needs and resources available in Japan. For the Soryō especially, this is how special men-at-arms are strengthened and unlocked.

Another way to build up the power of your house is to invest your prestige into House Aspirations. House aspirations have a theme and spending more prestige to upgrade them will unlock abilities and modifiers that will allow you to both specialize and grow the resources available to you. Aspirations will allow you to shape the strengths of your House by focusing on military might, intrigue, or economic development, and will also unlock certain upgrades for your family manor.



Southeast Asia

image_08.png


Southeast Asia in this timeline is not yet as close to the Chinese sphere of influence as Japan or Korea. The mainland as well as the islands are a mix of indigenous faiths with tribal rulers and Indophile states practicing Hinduism or Buddhism. Unlike the bureaucratic nature of the realms to their north, the realms here are often more transitory in nature. Small central realms often control networks of tributaries that contract or grow with relatively little drama. The Great Empires of this region were often more advanced versions of this, with priests administering the realm on behalf of self proclaimed God Kings based in enormous temple cities.

Mandala Government

In All Under Heaven, Buddhist and Hindu states in southeast Asia will predominantly start with the new Mandala Government. This government form initially has a lower vassal and domain limit, and instead relies on its own flavor of tributaries in a greater way.

Mandala realms have the new Temple Citadel as their main holding type, though they can also hold castles and temples.

Devaraja - God Kings

An independent Mandala ruler is considered a God King, or Devaraja. Most of your authority and power will stem from piety and many things that would otherwise cost prestige or even gold will now consume piety.

To be a Devaraja means aspiring to be an ideal ruler in Buddhism or Hinduism, with your radiance attracting tributaries and vassals to your cause. The more convincing you are in this respect the more tributaries you will be able to steal from other rulers, and the more your power can grow.

Devarajas also have access to several new levels of devotion, with increasing benefits that will increase the initially restrictive domain and vassal limits of the government. By advancing your status as a God King, a Mandala can eventually end up quite powerful, even if the initial drawbacks in the form of lower vassal and domain limits might make the government seem weak at first glance.

Capital Temple​

image_09.png


As a God King, the cult around your person is essentially the same thing as your authority as a ruler. To remind everyone of their power, rulers would construct great temple cities. Complexes such as Angkor Wat or Borobudur still stand today and demonstrated the divine power of rulers by showcasing their power and by providing a ceremonial center for the realms of the god kings.
Capital Temples make use of the new Great Project feature to let you, your vassals, and your tributaries invest in the growth of your Capital Temple.

While they are costly, Capital Temples are the first way in which you can alleviate the domain and vassal limit restrictions of your government type along with many other bonuses. A grand capital temple is also what will make tributaries remain with your heirs, who may not yet be as impressive in their role as divine rulers as you are.

Devaraja Aspects​

Similar to the Japanese House Aspirations, as a God King you will be able to invest piety into developing your personal cult. Focusing on warlike qualities will make it easier to gain piety through wars. Focusing on serenity might instead mean you can earn piety through more peaceful means, as an example. Your choice of Devaraja aspects will also decide what benefits you get from having high levels of devotion.



Additional Features in All Under Heaven

Great Projects

As mentioned above, another new feature to this update is Great Projects. This is a way for multiple rulers to pool their resources together to create something. Usually, this would be the vassals in a realm coming together to help fund something like the Great Wall, but it can also be local governors banding together to help push through disaster relief after a Natural Disaster. Benefits can be both direct, related to what the goal of the project itself is, and more individual, in terms of what the contributors get for helping.

A new type of building slot has also been introduced to allow Great Projects to create their own type of buildings that coexists with Special Buildings or Monuments. Not all Great Projects relate to a great building or monument however, though all will have tangible effects once they are completed.

There are a number of new Great Projects introduced in All Under Heaven. Like with all other features described today, we will talk more about what projects exist and about Great Projects as a feature in a future diary.

Natural Disasters

Natural Disasters are a type of recurring Situation that can strike in known areas. While the disaster impact is over relatively quickly, the Situation will linger and center on the rebuilding of the region after something like a great flood.

Every Natural disaster comes with a related Great Project, which means multiple characters in the same area can come together to fund the recovery effort. To this end, the projects also come with a number of optional investments that can potentially leverage the situation either for political benefits or lead to rebuilding the area to be more prosperous than it was prior to the disaster. Our intent here is not that natural disasters be a random and extremely punishing blow to your game but rather something to overcome that can present you with opportunities to demonstrate your skills as a ruler and use it as a possibility to ultimately advance your goals.

The Silk Road

While China was enormously important in East Asia and its surroundings, for many parts of the world China’s impact was more indirect. We wanted to take the opportunity to include this in the expansion, since it was still quite tangible.

For millennia, goods and innovations have flowed from China towards the west. Trade is not a feature of All Under Heaven, but the Silk Road will be visible on the map and controlling its entrepots will yield economic benefits if China is in an era where it is stable. Another venue that will be open to western rulers is that travelers to the entrepots of the Silk Road may help spread Chinese innovations to their home realms.

What About the Other Parts of the Map?

This diary tries to give an overview of all major features for the expansion, but it also leaves a lot unsaid for future diaries. In the coming weeks, we will be giving a closer overview of not only the features already described but also things not mentioned, such as Korea, the northern steppe, the tribal states in southeast Asia, and, of course, the map itself. Next week’s diary will start out by giving an overview of the new map, which will then be followed by more detailed breakdowns as we go through the features for each area.
 
  • 165Love
  • 149Like
  • 14
  • 10
  • 3
  • 1Haha
Reactions:
You might be thinking, “Oh, Western Xia is just a name given by the Chinese, and therefore it could never have been the official name used by the Tanguts themselves. We should instead use Mjinjaa, the name known among Tibetans.” But in fact, the Tanguts never referred to themselves as Mjinjaa. That name is a Tibetan exonym, not a self-designation. The Tanguts had their own endonyms, and historical evidence suggests they referred to their state as Great Xia (大夏国) or White High Great Xia State (白高大夏国). (Please forgive me for not being able to input the Tangut characters for your reference.).

Furthermore, the so-called Guiyi Circuit did not refer to themselves by that name. Guiyi (归义军), which means "Return to Righteousness," was a title granted by the Chinese emperor, implying the submission of “barbarians” to the moral authority of the empire. However, this framing is misleading. The leadership of the circuit, particularly Zhang Yichao (张议潮) and his dynasty members, were themselves ethnically Han Chinese, not “barbarians” in any cultural or political sense. In their own administrative practice, they referred to their polity as the Hexi Circuit (河西军), a more neutral and geographically grounded term that reflects their actual base of power in the Hexi Corridor.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
I have a few questions and recommendations:
1). Will you be making the Arabian Empire into a Hegemony tier, since it's clearly supposed to be the Umayyad Caliphate (because Damascus is the de-jure capital)? This would probably require turning the Kingdoms of Nubia, Egypt, and Blemmiya into an Egyptian Empire; the Kingdoms of Syria and Jerusalem into the Empire of the Levant; and split the Kingdom of Arabia into the Kingdoms of Oman, Hejaz, and Nejd and combine it with the Kingdom of Yemen into the Empire of Arabia.
2). Will you be able to siphon funds from the treasury? And if you are able to do that, then it should get easier during the corrupt phase of the Dynastic Cycle.
3). Can you swap the bottom two pictures, in the Dynastic Cycle? Because it is currently going counter-clockwise, instead of clockwise. Since the bird is supposed to represent the peaceful phase, the snake and eggs for the corrupt phase, and the fighting wolves for the phase where it all falls apart (the warring states period); right?
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I have no illusion that it's probably too late in the development process for feedback to be taken into account on such fundamental matters, and my ideas are underdeveloped, but I'd like to voice them all the same.

If a higher tier is absolutely necessary to mechanically illustrate the relationships between rulers in the Far East, I think things would be better off both in terms of mechanical complexity and historical accuracy if we had two tiers of Kingdom, the larger ones taking the role of Empires as they exist in the game and Hegemonies being renamed to Empires instead.

This sounds confusing, so I'll give some examples: France, Brittany and Aquitaine at the 867 start would be this "lower" type of Kingdom, and the decision to consolidate them together would turn the whole thing into France (or a different name based on culture), a "higher" Kingdom. The lower composite titles of "France", "Brittany" and "Aquitane" would then, depending on the cultural context, either

A) Be destroyed and remain uncreatable unless a dissolution faction takes the "higher" Kingdom title out of existence.
This would apply to places like France or Spain, where a [X Hegemony] ending to the struggle for Iberia would form a consolidated Kingdom of Spain/Hispania/Isbanya out of the smaller titles that exist there. The same could be done with Scotland, Wales & England into Great Britan/the United Kingdom or the Subkingdoms of Germany (though they don't exist in the game starts yet) such as Saxony, Bavaria etc. into Germany.

B) Become vassals to the new "higher" King
This would apply in places like Persia, where the lower Kings would be "Shah" and the new high King would be "Shahanshah" and India, where you could have "Raja" for the minor Kingdoms and "Maharaja" for the larger ones. Ireland and it's High Kingship could also be accurately represented with this system.

In short, in my opinion, the arrangement should be:
Barony > County > Duchy > "petty" / "lower" Kingdom > "great" / "consolidated" Kingdom > Empire

rather than:
Barony > County > Duchy > Kingdom > Empire > Hegemony
 
  • 5Like
  • 1Haha
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
What's the reasoning behind introducing this new holding type? Given that Constantinople and Paris are represented by Castle holdings rather than by Cities or City-Castle hybrids, I'm not sure that Temple-Castle hybrids are needed. What makes these differ from fortified temples?
I agree. This specifically points out a long standing issue with CK3, the arbitrary divide between holding types.
In reality, it was not uncommon, apart from abbeys which were by themselves seats of religious power only, to see a mix of clergy, nobles, burghers and peasantry in a city.
A good example of this is the city of Geneva, which was part of the county of Geneva, hosted the bishop of Geneva, and revolted to form the republic of Geneva.
Likewise for Italy were nobles and bishops were sometimes overthrown by republics (Milan, Firenze…) and sometimes the situation reverted.
Many times, the seats of power of bishops or archbishops were located in a preeminent city, right because of its wealth and prestige, and coincided or overlapped with the seat of a noble house.
The HRE in general is a very good example of this with many Free Cities holding the same title as a bishopric or archbishopric.

In fact, it’s very hard to imagine the « static » nature of holdings, to be determined from their construction, as they would more likely in history have been a single location (city or village around an abbey), with sometimes conflicting interests and powers within it.
Like in EU4, I would hope to have cities be represented uniformly, with the ability for some barons to revolt and overthrow the county owner (I.e., your city council revolting against a count and declaring a republic).
 
  • 5Like
  • 1
Reactions:
I agree. This specifically points out a long standing issue with CK3, the arbitrary divide between holding types.
In reality, it was not uncommon, apart from abbeys which were by themselves seats of religious power only, to see a mix of clergy, nobles, burghers and peasantry in a city.
A good example of this is the city of Geneva, which was part of the county of Geneva, hosted the bishop of Geneva, and revolted to form the republic of Geneva.
Likewise for Italy were nobles and bishops were sometimes overthrown by republics (Milan, Firenze…) and sometimes the situation reverted.
Many times, the seats of power of bishops or archbishops were located in a preeminent city, right because of its wealth and prestige, and coincided or overlapped with the seat of a noble house.
The HRE in general is a very good example of this with many Free Cities holding the same title as a bishopric or archbishopric.

In fact, it’s very hard to imagine the « static » nature of holdings, to be determined from their construction, as they would more likely in history have been a single location (city or village around an abbey), with sometimes conflicting interests and powers within it.
Like in EU4, I would hope to have cities be represented uniformly, with the ability for some barons to revolt and overthrow the county owner (I.e., your city council revolting against a count and declaring a republic).

Its because CK3 was built on the logic that holding onto land= determines what kind of power you have as opposed to a more dynamic system where it's legal rights that determined what kinds of status a place has and what sort of privileges it is granted.

Castles used to represent the only form of personal estates that can be inherited, but with an actual estate mechanic this is not necessary anymore. I imagine when we get a republic DLC we will see a rework of cities as it will now represent the different kinds of people who can all gain power within a city.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
If the gates for new holding types are opened, a metropolis holding type for biggest cities like Constantinople, Baghdad, Paris, or Beijing would feel great. I'd probably prefer to see them represented as City holdings simply, but if for some reason Feudal rulers are not able to hold them then a new Metropolis holding would be better than the Castle one they currently are.
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Something I’d like to know is if a Emishi or Ainu leader submits to Japanese rule, could they adopt the Ritsuyro or Soryo forms of governance or whether it’s strictly for the Japanese culture.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions:
I have no illusion that it's probably too late in the development process for feedback to be taken into account on such fundamental matters, and my ideas are underdeveloped, but I'd like to voice them all the same.

If a higher tier is absolutely necessary to mechanically illustrate the relationships between rulers in the Far East, I think things would be better off both in terms of mechanical complexity and historical accuracy if we had two tiers of Kingdom, the larger ones taking the role of Empires as they exist in the game and Hegemonies being renamed to Empires instead.

This sounds confusing, so I'll give some examples: France, Brittany and Aquitaine at the 867 start would be this "lower" type of Kingdom, and the decision to consolidate them together would turn the whole thing into France (or a different name based on culture), a "higher" Kingdom. The lower composite titles of "France", "Brittany" and "Aquitane" would then, depending on the cultural context, either

A) Be destroyed and remain uncreatable unless a dissolution faction takes the "higher" Kingdom title out of existence.
This would apply to places like France or Spain, where a [X Hegemony] ending to the struggle for Iberia would form a consolidated Kingdom of Spain/Hispania/Isbanya out of the smaller titles that exist there. The same could be done with Scotland, Wales & England into Great Britan/the United Kingdom or the Subkingdoms of Germany (though they don't exist in the game starts yet) such as Saxony, Bavaria etc. into Germany.

B) Become vassals to the new "higher" King
This would apply in places like Persia, where the lower Kings would be "Shah" and the new high King would be "Shahanshah" and India, where you could have "Raja" for the minor Kingdoms and "Maharaja" for the larger ones. Ireland and it's High Kingship could also be accurately represented with this system.

In short, in my opinion, the arrangement should be:
Barony > County > Duchy > "petty" / "lower" Kingdom > "great" / "consolidated" Kingdom > Empire

rather than:
Barony > County > Duchy > Kingdom > Empire > Hegemony
To what end? This is beneficial for the specific cases you've outlined but wouldn't do much to model countries like China better or address how the Arabian "Empire" is missing the vast majority of the historical Caliphates
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Also, the tendency of ambitious Chinese men to increase their perceived merit by withdrawing to the mountains - thus demonstrating their moral elevation and lack of concern for political power - whilst making sure that the mountains they withdrew to were as close to the court as possible, so that their noble lack of worldly ambition would be noticed by the emperor and it would be as straightforward as possible to reward their virtue with higher office, was apparently so common it became a medieval Chinese meme. https://en.clearharmony.net/articles/a21952-The-Chinese-Idiom-of-Zhongnan-Mountain-Shortcut.html

(I have now made a suggestion related to this practice, as well as other things that went on in elite Chinese society outside of the formal bureaucratic structure: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...tional-arts-of-the-chinese-gentleman.1766652/)

 
  • 1
Reactions:
To what end? This is beneficial for the specific cases you've outlined but wouldn't do much to model countries like China better or address how the Arabian "Empire" is missing the vast majority of the historical Caliphates

"To what end" besides accurate simulation??

China would still be a "hegemony" tier Empire from the start, and I don't see the necessity of simulating what the Caliphate is missing by the game start on a de jure map. It's not like Byzantium gets all of Rome under their de jure imperial borders at the start. Neither should the Sunni Caliphate get all the former Ummayad lands as de jure.
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Regarding Japan's "top position" I have a few questions:
  1. Can the Emperor seize Japan's top position?
  2. After the Shogun or a cloistered Emperor seizes Japan's top position, what title would the Kanpaku hold at that point?
  3. Can the Shikken (the de facto military dictator of Japan) andobtain Japan's top position? If so, what title would the Shogun hold then?
  4. Is the Tokuso (the head of the Hojo clan)’s actual rule over Japan through his control of the Shikken and the Shogun represented in the game?
  5. Is the Toshi-choja (the head of the Fujiwara clan)’s actual rule over Japan through his control of the Kanpaku represented in the game?
 
  • 3
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Amazing Dev Diary! So good to see these regions will get distinct playstyles. Surprisingly, I find myself most excited for playing on the Indonesian islands. They seem like a nice area to build an empire in. The same goes for the Philippines, Taiwan and Zanzibar.

What is an era-appropriate term for the Philippines by the way?
Indian scholars called the entire archipelago, Panyupayana = land of vast waters

Chinese scholars only portrayed the Coastal city of Ma-i which is modern day mindoro

It is a land inhabbited mostly Austronesians so maybe Austronesia could be a good term for them

Any way the Philippines is a group of many small kingdoms and kedatuans
 
  • 3
Reactions:
Indian scholars called the entire archipelago, Panyupayana = land of vast waters
How certain are you about this term? It gives me some major ‘it was coin by someone without a working knowledge of Sanskrit’ vibe due to some linguistic problems I see with that (namely: it would be Pānīyopāyana, if anything; Pānyupāyana looks like it was coined using pānī as word for water [as in e.g. Hindi, and other vernaculars], and not Sanskritic pānīya), and when I tried to Google the term, it all led me to work of just one researcher [and then to his article in SEACOM Studies, which neither looks like a very convincing publication, nor is available].

I also wanted to check the places in Ramayana he claims the Philippines are mentioned, because… uh… the Panyupayana – even if that was the term – certainly does not mean anything to the effect of ‘land of vast waters’. The ‘pānīya’ is water, yeah, but ‘upāyana’ is not ‘the land’, but ‘approach’. The entire term would be ‘[that to which] approach [is] water’, so basically the land beyond water. The kicker is, however, that with Devanagari there is no capitalization, so – if the phrase is indeed is present in Ramayana – then I’d love to actually see if it is in any place where we could presume it refers to Philippines, and not e.g. Ravana’s kingdom of Lanka beyond the waters.
 
  • 4
Reactions: