• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Developer Diary | Opposition Iran

Generals!

It’s Synth here, good to see you again! I hope you’re ready for our latest report in Graveyard of Empires! Last time we explored the historical events that took place in Iran during World War 2, as well as the potential alt history that lay within a strong Iranian Empire. This time, we take a look at what the opposition had to say in regards to the Pahlavi Dynasty. Buckle up soldiers, we’re going to be exploring the Democratic, Communist and Fascist paths and see what kind of alternate history awaits us.

From what we saw in history, Iran maintained its monarchy all the way through to the 1970s, but as with all nations, it was never a cut and dry case. In the 20th century, ideology took a forefront in modern politics, and Iran was no stranger to concepts such as communism and fascism. Today, we are going to explore a few what if scenarios, in which the Shah was faced with a strong enough opposition to change the trajectory of Iran on the world stage. Without further ado, let’s hop right in!

(A disclaimer: there may be some placeholder art for the time being)
0.png

Is being a King of Kings not your cup of tea? Well, we have a wide selection of ideology for you!

1.png

Taking power is not so simple. You must build your opposition first.

Before we dive into any specific branch, you must first establish your national front. Doing so will unlock a decision in which you can decide where to place your ‘headquarters’ should a civil war break out (And let me be real with you folks, it probably will). This will make that state your capital when you decide to go to war with the Shah, giving you a good foothold for your new government.

This will allow you to then take some more decisions through the next focuses, which will help you to lower support for the Shah and establish opposition groups in various states that will join you on the onset of a civil war.

From this point, you must then decide which ideology you want to use to spearhead Iran into the future.


Rallying Behind Mosaddegh
2.png

I love democracy, I love the Republic…

Have you heard the tale of Mohammad Mosaddegh? He was a prominent Iranian politician, author and lawyer. To this day, he remains one of the most popular figures in Iranian history. In the context of Graveyard of Empires, Mosaddegh is the man who will spearhead our democratic movement in Iran.
As the democratic Iranian player, you will have the choice of either restoring and maintaining constitutional limits on the Shah, allowing him to serve as a figurehead, or instead work towards a republic, which will inevitably result in the Shah’s deposition. Whilst forcing an abdication will result in a civil war no matter what, if you are able to garner enough democratic support, you should be able to avoid conflict and quietly become a full democracy if you instead decide to enforce a constitutional monarchy.

3.png

I’m sure the Shah won’t mind…

4.png

Oh yeah, he probably will mind…

At this point, you are now a democracy, and it is time to open up free elections and decide who you want to lead your nation. You will have three options, each with their own perks: Mohammad Mosaddegh, Mohammad Ali Foroughi, and Abol Ghasem Kashani.

If you choose to follow a constitutional monarchy, there will also be an option to strengthen the power of the Islamic clergy, and generally reject overt westernization. This won’t result in a take over, but it will ensure that religion will continue to have a place within your new government.

5.png

It always comes down to oil, doesn’t it?

There are two ways in which foreign policy can go when playing democratic Iran. One will take you down a path of anti-colonialist movements in the middle east (which I will touch on after the communist branch, as both ideologies can take this), and joining up with the Allies. The latter will allow you to secure Iraq and Afghanistan to have a better control over the region and ensure that the middle east remains democratic. Like I said, I will discuss international solidarity a bit later, but first let’s take a look at the communist branch of Iran!


The Rise of the Tudeh
6.png

Red, as far as the eye can see

The Tudeh party was an Iranian communist party that had considerable influence in their early years of operation, including playing an important role alongside Mosaddegh in the attempts to nationalize the Anglo-Iranian oil company. Following the occupation of Iran, however, they became very pro-Soviet, which we have reflected here in the tree. The other option is to follow the Iran Party, which was not as far left as the Tudeh were, but also played their role as part of the backbone of the ‘National Front’. Even though their membership never exceeded the several hundreds, they remain a potential route to take in your efforts to bring the communist revolution to Iran!
In order to proceed down this path, it is crucial that you reach out to the Kurdish and Azerbaijani separatists, promising them independence once you have taken power. Once you carry out your revolution, you will have a certain amount of time to deliver on your promise of independence or they will try and take it from you by force!

7.png

Plans must be laid following your revolution

Following your rise to power, it is time to make some decisions on what to do. Given the proximity towards the Soviet Union, regardless of whether or not you align with them directly, you will be working closely with them. After working on restructuring your industry and making changes to your country, the path of the Iranian communist tree becomes a lot more focused on building a military and engaging in foreign policy.

8.png

That’s a lot of collaboration…​


In order to keep up with the military behemoth of your communist neighbour, the latter part of this branch focuses on collaborating with them in order to strengthen your military technology. This should help the Iranian communist player prepare for any threats to their new ideology.

On the flip side, we can finally talk about international solidarity!

9.png

It’s time to de-colonize!

This little sub-branch is shared by the communist and democratic tree, and will give you the opportunity to cause a little chaos in the region. For many years, European powers have held colonial dominance in the Middle East, and now it is time to disrupt their great game and expel them from these lands. Don’t get it entirely twisted, however. There are gains to be made here, after all, if these lands are under your “protection”, then they won’t be in the hands of the great empires either.

These focuses will give you an opportunity to de-stabilize your immediate neighbours and solidify a sense of control in the region. Afterwards, you can encourage resistance in the border lands and eventually stake your own claims around the Persian gulf, replacing the external imperial powers with your own hegemony.


Under New Leadership

10.png

The path to Iranian Fascism

Historically, the hyper-nationalist party SUMKA was not formed until the 1950s, under the leadership of Davud Monshizadeh and was directly inspired and reflective of the leadership of Germany during World War 2. In the context of our branch here, they will be formed early and will be the main party leading this new fascist Iran.

First we begin by uniting those with nationalist sentiments and collate them into forming SUMKA. Whilst this brings a hit to stability, it will start to tick favour to be more in line with fascism.

11.png

March of the shocktroopers

By organizing shocktrooper marches, more of the military will join your side when your coup begins, meaning you can overwhelm the Shah with numbers, ultimately leading to an easier grab for power. However, there is also the option to sway the elite in Iran to your side. When the war is over and you have secured power, it will give you an opportunity to select a new Shah who will be more sympathetic to your cause, relegating him to nothing more than a figurehead.

With that under way, it is time to take your stand.

12.png

An empire fractured…


13.png

Expanding outwards

After a brutal civil war, it is time to rebuild your nation into something more befitting of a hyper-nationalist and fascist regime. You can enforce secularism, which will cause a dip in support, stability and research for a while, but will ultimately allow you to spearhead new technologies through a research slot. You may also establish your own secret police to maintain order in your new nation.

Eventually though, you will need to make a choice. Will you side with the nationalists in Germany? align yourself with the Japanese Empire? Or go your own way and develop your own fascist bloc? Either one of these will allow the Iranian player to begin intervening in their neighbours business, staking claims on Turkey, Iraq and Afghanistan, before eventually turning your gaze towards the pesky communists to the north.

14.png

Germany or Iran? Who will bring the New World Order?

After forming Greater Iran, you have a few choices ahead of you. Sow discourse in the Middle East, by flaring tensions between the Arab nations and turning them against each other. Turn your gaze to India and deal with the fracturing of Imperial power in the region. But ultimately, there is one final boss to deal with…

There can only be one fascist superpower in the world, and if you have your way, it will not be Germany.


Welcome to the Graveyard of Empires
And that, Generals, brings me to our conclusion. As you can see, we have given you a myriad of options to play with when it comes to this absolutely fascinating country. Whether you defend yourself against aggressive invaders; build an empire founded on national pride; or bring Iran into a new age of democratic, fascist or communist ideologies, there is something for everyone.

I truly hope you all enjoy playing these four nations when they release with Graveyard of Empires, as we had a blast making this content for you and exploring an often forgotten part of the world.

As always, have a great day, have fun, and I’ll see you all later!

-Synth
 
  • 32Like
  • 13Love
  • 6
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions:
If Iran didn't have a fascist movement at the time, and so new dlc had to bring in the SUMKA party from the 1950s, who would lead a fascist Iran? would there be a unique leader?
This is a really weird detail to be honest because Iran did very much have fascist movements, from Abdolhossein Teymourtash's Iran-e No party in the 1920s which represented corporatists and radical modernisers inspired by Mussolini, to Fazlollah Zahedi's Azure Party in the 40s which united the pro-German factions of the Iranian military, I don't understand why they chose to go with SUMKA apart from their "weirdness" factor.

SUMKA was a lot more esoteric yes, a lot more steeped in mysticism, but it was also barely functional as a political movement. It was pretty much just a Nazi fanclub, that mainly appealed to bored high school students who dabbled in politics. Davud Monshizadeh wasn't even in Iran for most of this period of history, he's in his early 20s studying literature abroad and only really threw himself into political origanising much later. That Azure Party had a significant influence on the Iranian government until it was purged during the occupation. Quite disappointed to see Paradox took the easy way out and picked another "funny and weird" option, and an ahistorical one at that. Still, could have been much worse. Davud being 22 years old at the start of the game is faintly ridiculous, but at least its not quite as bad as the toddlers and teenagers in the Congo political paths.

Just a note, I think the Imperial State of Iran was Iran's official name under the Pahlavi dynasty. So please change it so Pahlavi Iran gets that name. SUMKA Iran can get something like Iranian or Persian Empire.

Also even though not stricly communist in appearance, Mosadegh was cordial to them against the west. Meaning Communists supported him as well and that his movement wasn't one of a pure Democratic Nature. I think Shahpur Bakhtiar, the last prime minister of Iran under Pahlavi fits that role more accurately.

it's a small thing though, doesn't matter that much.
Bakhtiar was much more radical than Mossadegh actually! Mossadegh was a traditionalist conservative, he believed in modernisation and in the nationalisation of Iran's resources because he wanted a powerful Iranian state, not due to any sympathies for the left. Bakhtiar is fascinating though, openly flirted with socialism with the Bakhtiari Star Party, a small cadre of intellectuals, and he even volunteered to fight for the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War.
 
Last edited:
  • 13
  • 5Like
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
I know it's probably too late for major changes, but I think the inclusion of SUMKA is not the right choice, mostly because at the time, the Pan-Iranist Party existed. It may not have been strictly fascist, but it was definitely expansionist, right-leaning, and had a clearly fascist faction (led by Forouhar), which would make for a great feature in the game. His real-life ideals would be easier to represent than the SUMKA ones, for example Forouhar wouldn't be available as an advisor unless the Shah was deposed and replaced, while the more cooperative Pezeshkpour would be, with all three available as country leaders. The tree would already fit because SUMKA had similar policies to the Pan-Iranist Party. Regarding the question of whether Pezeshkpour's party was fascist, after all, even Vargas can lead the fascist movement in Brazil, so I think their inclusion would be better than giving a 1950s party a time machine. It's true that the future SUMKA leader was active during WW2, but in my opinion, he would be more fitting as an advisor rather than a leader. On the last note, there were also other, smaller fascist movements in Iran at the time being, but Pan-Iranist Party was historically speaking definitely the most notable one. I just don't know why SUMKA was chosen.
 
  • 7
  • 3
Reactions:
So no real Islamic Revolution route? A fascist route that is somewhat lackluster? Communist branch looks good though.
 
  • 10Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
So no real Islamic Revolution route? A fascist route that is somewhat lackluster? Communist branch looks good though.
They did mention that one of the Democratic leaders you can elect is Abol-Gashem Kashani, who was a leading Islamist. Admittedly I think he is quite a weird choice for a "Democratic" leader, he was explicitly against democracy and used his Fedayeens to assassinate political opponents. I would assume the Democratic Path is also probably going to drift into the orbit of the Allies or other major democratic factions, which seems a weird choice for a guy like Kashani who hated western influence over Iran. If possible, electing him (as implausible as it is) should flip you to Nonaligned.
 
  • 6
Reactions:
why is there no islamic path in the focus tree? a revolution againts the shahs reforms led by ayatollah borujerdi or Abu al-Hasan Isfahani for example would be very likely.
also the decision to choose Kashani as a islamic democratic leader is weird, because he only gained popularity in the 1950s.
 

Attachments

  • pic-444-1450180932.jpg
    pic-444-1450180932.jpg
    50,2 KB · Views: 0
  • Abu_l-Hasan_al-Isfahani.jpg
    Abu_l-Hasan_al-Isfahani.jpg
    265,2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • 9Like
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
If Iran didn't have a fascist movement at the time, and so new dlc had to bring in the SUMKA party from the 1950s, who would lead a fascist Iran? would there be a unique leader?
They had multiple small parties like the azure party and others but it is more likely that in theory that perhaps Davud Monshiadzeh comes back to Iran in the late 30’s after visiting Germany in 1937 and let’s say that if the politics of Iran became to be more fascistic he’d try to organize all these smaller groups into one big one like the sumka was, the sumka in a sense succeeded these smaller groups… and given that most of the leaders of Iran in this update were around in the 50’s it doesn’t seem that crazy to form the sumka that early on…. It’s all in a alt history scenario, and like I said these other groups that did exist weren’t ever as popular as sumka and in reality there were many the national socialist parties that existed pre war, seems reasonable to group them all into one
 
  • 1
Reactions:
So where is the Islamic path?
They helped Mossadegh in the oil nationalization campaign led by Ayatollah Kashani, they also assassinated the Pahlavi leaders several times, and their ideas ultimately brought down the government. In the 80s, you created four very similar paths to nationalism, most of which are completely fantasy, such as the Achaemenids or the rise of Somka, an unknown party in the past and present.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I’m surprised to not see a mention of Ayatollah Khomeini, who to my knowledge was already a political commentator at the time - especially since so much of the rest of this focus tree is based around later events. Was Khomeini becoming influential in the ‘40s deemed too unrealistic?
 
I’m surprised to not see a mention of Ayatollah Khomeini, who to my knowledge was already a political commentator at the time - especially since so much of the rest of this focus tree is based around later events. Was Khomeini becoming influential in the ‘40s deemed too unrealistic?
i think the leading islamic figure in the time of ww2 would be ayatollah Abu al-Hasan Isfahani or ayatollah borujerdi, who were influential clergy members
 
  • 6Like
Reactions:
Until last month, the DLC description mentioned the path of the Islamic Revolution in Iran.
What happened that you didn't include it among the political paths?
I think the path of the Islamic Revolution had a lot of potential.
It seems like the alternative political paths section has been rushed. The historical section on Iran, especially the Persian Empire, is rich in content, but the alternative section in general doesn't seem that interesting.
 
Last edited:
  • 18Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Mosadegh is one of the most hated people in Iranian history, he's the father of both of our evils, both the Red evil(Communism) and the Black evil(islamism). And if you think those two things are antithetical, you'd be surprised.
 
  • 4Like
  • 3
Reactions:
They did mention that one of the Democratic leaders you can elect is Abol-Gashem Kashani, who was a leading Islamist. Admittedly I think he is quite a weird choice for a "Democratic" leader, he was explicitly against democracy and used his Fedayeens to assassinate political opponents. I would assume the Democratic Path is also probably going to drift into the orbit of the Allies or other major democratic factions, which seems a weird choice for a guy like Kashani who hated western influence over Iran. If possible, electing him (as implausible as it is) should flip you to Nonaligned.
I pray this is some hidden path like the pope path and we get an Islamist path where we can cause uprisings in Shia territories and core Sunni territories after showing them the benefits of Shia Islam.
 
  • 5Like
  • 3
Reactions:
Islamic Revolution path, please paradox, everyone wants it
(and maybe Qajar too????)
The Qajar pretender served in the British navy and couldn't even speak proper Farsi so the British dropped the idea of reinstalling them in 1941. But I agree on the Islamic Revolution path.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: