• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Developer diary | Performance & Modding

Hello everyone, it's again the time to give you a glimpse into the fun stuff we've been doing from the tech side. You know, in addition to implementing the new features. This time around, I PDXen got the honour to write the Developer Diary.

I'm gonna start off with some outdated news from the past: Did you know that we did a performance pass on Trial of Allegiance? I honestly hope that you didn't. Being a country pack, we never intended to improve the performance but we did make improvements to counter the influx of data that happens when we add more content.

But I know you don't want to listen to ramblings about the past. So let's get started on what we've done this time. While we've taken time to look at the performance and improve parts of it, we've also added some new generic features that we hope our modders will like.

Performance

I'm gonna be brutally honest with you from the start: The performance goal of this DLC was to not decay performance. (Un)fortunately, this doesn't mean we can lean back and ignore it. More content and new features all add to the computations we need to run and I wanted all the new stuff to happen at net-zero performance cost. Essentially, the same thing as for Trial of Allegiance, but with much more. So we had to do something to maintain the status quo with performance.

So whenever our performance tracking indicated a slowdown for the first time I took a look at what we could optimize and became a bit disheartened. The French Paradox did a very good job at parallelising much of our code for AAT. There were not many easy options for parallelisation left but we managed to identify a few places. Even on our machines with quite a lot of cores, this wasn’t enough so we took a step back and looked at optimizing the sequential parts of the code. I hope this is quite good news for all of us that run on hardware with fewer cores.

The hunt for optimization opportunities led to looking at old systems that now had more data and the uncharted lands of legacy code. I’m just gonna give you a few tidbits of old systems that we found interesting assumptions about the data in or simply interesting ways of solving it.

Focuses
I imagine some of you have been with us from the start. Do you remember the size of the original focus trees? And for those of you who don't, simply open up the generic tree to get an idea. Over the years, we've had a large influx of focuses in the focus trees. For example, we have ~60 in the generic focus tree compared to the ~180 national focuses in Belgium, not counting the Belgian-Congo part. And the size of the Belgium focus tree doesn't even compare to the new German one (which is somewhere between 350 and 400 focuses).


German focus tree.png

The new German focus tree with 350-400 focuses, which I couldn’t even fit into a 2k screen.


Belgium focus tree.png

The new Belgium focus tree with ~180 focuses.


Haiti focus tree.png

The Haiti docs tree is using the generic focus tree with ~60 focuses.


The size in itself is not that much of a problem since you generally don’t have the focus tree open at all times. However, we have a nifty functionality to bypass focus. Over time this function has taken more and more performance to run. Guess why? It checked every single focus in the game, every single time. At some point in time that might not have been an issue but with the size of the current focus trees? The good thing is that it’s not as bad anymore. We now only check the focus that has a remote chance of being bypassed.


Dynamic memory and Parallelism
When we started looking at the sequential parts of our parallel code we found a quite interesting trend. There's a lot of dynamic memory allocation. Now every time we do something that requires dynamic memory allocation, the operative system may grab a global lock. Essentially, risking the algorithm to become at least partially sequential. Finding this caused a period of going through the code and eliminating the worst of these dynamic memory allocations.


Hidden AAT Inefficiencies
AAT was the expansion that optimized HoI4 (in modern times). Now there’s a drawback with the drastically improved performance: All the inefficiencies from the new systems in AAT were hidden by the drastic improvements in the rest of the game. A lot of old content was optimized by a large margin, and as a result new performance overhead simply got lost in the steadily improving numbers. For example, on my machine disabling the international market automation saved me 2ms per daily update. It’s not a lot (about 0.5% of the overall performance on my machine). But for market automation? Good news, it’s way less now. Bad news, you can still improve performance a very small amount by disabling it (though, manually clicking will have way worse performance in terms of speed).

Another hidden inefficiency that we’ve found is the increase in the number of equipment variants. Before, there was a very limited amount of equipment variants in a game but now, there’s a lot of them. Every single MIO update can create a multitude of different variants. And not to mention that International Market and Lend Lease pass these variants around in the game. Now throughout the code base, there are a lot of things that interact with equipment. Every interaction wasn’t adding much but all put together, that’s quite a bit. I won’t say that variants are free but please go ahead and add more, there should be less performance impact now than before at least.


Modding
Now let’s leave the area of performance and continue with some other things we’ve looked at from the tech side: New fancy modding stuff. During the development, I got a bit fed up with requests for support for new tooltips. So we sat down and thought: How can we get content developers to write the tooltips themselves? While we couldn't backport Jomini to HoI4, we took some inspiration and made it possible to write more complex tooltips in the GUI and script files.

Localization, Localization and Localization
If you have looked into our localization files before, you've probably noticed something like the following:

image.png

Traditionally, this meant that `REASON` was replaced with something that was provided by the game (i.e. not scripteD). In many cases, these variables were just replaced with some other localized string. So to avoid having to update the source code every time we wanted to change this, we introduced a new concept to the scripting language: Bound localization.

Bound localization simply allows you to bind variables to the localization from script. So instead of opening up the source code, we can now simply update the script files like the following:

image (1).png


bound localizationpng.png

The localization for the sort by name button injects the sort key from script to localization.

Oh, and did I mention that it’s recursive so you can do stuff like this if you want to:

image (2).png

Naturally, doing this was opening up Pandora's box with requests from some content developers so we continued a bit more to push the boundaries. For example, in the german focus tree we can find the following odd syntax:

image (3).png


Custom effect tooltip.png

The custom effect tooltip that shows the state modifiers for a dam with a custom indentation to fit this very specific tooltip.

This adds another new concept we introduced: localization formatters. Essentially, it allows you to get a localized text property of some static token (in this case then state modifiers for
the `dam` building). You’ll recognize a text formatter when you see a localization key that has the format `<formatter>|<token>`. Some of the formatters also take some parameters (such as the `INDENT` in the example above). The benefit of using these over new tooltip overrides for effects or triggers is that the localization formatters are usable in every place a bound localization is usable (some might require that it’s localized with some context but that should be documented).

One of the main drawbacks with the new things we add, is that you can in general only use it in specific places that is pointed out from source code. Unfortunately, this still holds for the new stuff but the goal was for fewer requests for tooltips so we made some effort to make it a bit more usable. For example, you can use this in the very much (ab)used `custom_effect_tooltip` effect, `custom_trigger_tooltip` trigger as well as in some of the new places (see for example, the building database). But the main thing is that we added support for this in GUI files.

All our GUItypes now support the new tooltip `bound_tooltip` construct. If you use this, then you'll be able to use the bound localization. And maybe more interesting is the `context_aware_tooltip` construct that is a bound localization but it will be localized with a context so you can use contextual localization. Unfortunately, this requires us to provide the context from the source so mostly new places support this (and we try to document it in the GUI files, when and where it is supported). Note that this is recursive so if a parent object is localised with a context, then all children objects will be localized with the same context.

We'll come back to this in a short while when digging into the tech behind the new inner circle GUI in the focus tree.

Naming is Hard
Imagine that you have a province or state that, depending on who you ask, has a different name. For techs, equipment and a lot of other things we’ve had the support to add country specific names (we call it cosmetic tags) by simply adding the countries tag before the name of it. Now we’ve added the same support to province and state names as well.

We can take Turku as an example, this Finish area has both a Finish and a Swedish name (Turku being the name in Finish and Åbo is the name in Swedish). Before we had quite some script to change the name of the state depending on its owner but now we simply have to prefix the name with the correct country tag in the localization file:


image (4).png


Turku.png

The state of Turku (i.e. Finland owns the state).

Åbo.png

The state of Åbo (i.e. Sweden owns the state).

Focus Navigation
More national focus means more fun, right? But at some point it just becomes hard to navigate the focus tree. Fear not, we’ve added an option to add navigation shortcuts to focus trees. The new German tree has 6 different navigation icons (when I’m writing this).

Focus navigation tab.png

The focus navigation tabs for the new German tree.

If we click for example the “Economy” navigation tab, then we’ll be moved to the economy section of the tree with a nice zoom level for it. Naturally, this is completely scriptable so you can modify the focus trees to your liking for your mods.

Focus Inlay Windows
You've probably seen the Inner Circle GUI in another Dev Diary by now, but did you know that the whole GUI is written in script, and it doesn’t contain a single scripted GUI window? The inner circle is the first usage of what we call focus inlay window. A focus inlay window is, similar to the continuous focus window, a GUI object that is drawn inside the focus tree view..

Let’s go through an example: We want to display all the potential members of the Nordic Defence Council and if they have joined. For some reason it’s also very critical for us that we show the leaders of the countries. Something like the following:

The Nordic Defense Council.png

A focus inlay window to show the potential members of The Nordic Defense Council with access to the joint focus tree.

When defining a new inlay window, there's three main components that you need to implement: The inlay window definition; the GUI definition; and add it to the focus tree(s) it should be shown. Let's start with the completely new construct, the inlay window definition.

As for most components in HoI4 different databases have different folders and so has this. The inlay windows are located in the `game/common/focus_inlay_windows/` and we can throw up the first definition of the inlay window as follows:

image (5).png

This is actually a minimum working example for a focus inlay window definition. We've now a new inlay window with ID `nordic_alliance_inlay_window` that points to a container window named `nordic_alliance_ui_window`. Let's continue with adding more stuff to this later on and continue with the GUI itself.

image (6).png

The GUI components aren't anything new, but I've thrown in some of the new localization capabilities to give you an example. Since all focus inlay windows are localised with the focus tree country as the context, we're free to use all the new fancy stuff when writing the localization. We have one `context_aware_text` that uses the contextual localization to grab the faction name. Another that uses bound localization to localise `NORDIC_COUNCIL_MEMBER` with the parameters `IN_FACTION` and `COUNTRY` with the result from localising `[SWE.NordicCouncilMemberInFaction]` and `[SWE.GetNameWithFlag]`, respectively. I’ve also thrown in a `context_aware_tooltip` to get the name of the leader when hovering over the portrait.

While we're at it, we can complete the localization by adding the following scripted localization to the game (in `game/common/scripted_localisation`):

image (7).png

And add the localization key `NORDIC_COUNCIL_MEMBER` to a loc file:

image (8).png

With the localization done we only need to fix the portraits of the country leaders. Defining dynamic images for focus inlay windows is done in the focus inlay window definition:

image (9).png

The `scripted_images` entry contains a list of image definitions that will be used in the focus inlay window. In this case, the icon named `Sweden` will have its image replaced with `GFX_portrait_SWE_per_albin_hansson` if Swedens’ current country leader is `SWE_per_albin_hansson`. If this doesn’t hold, then the next entry in `Sweden` will be checked and so on until something that evaluates to true is encountered. The last entry in this example (`GFX_blank_leader_portrait`) always evaluates to true and is therefore the default image if no other is true.

Now there’s only some final touches to be made. Firstly, we’ll restrict the inlay window to only be shown if the country has formed (or joined) a Nordic joint alliance (i.e. has completed the `NORDIC_form_joint_alliance`. Secondly, we’ll set the window to only be visible to the country owning the focus tree (so no other player can view it).

image (10).png

That’s it, really. We’ve now completely defined a focus inlay window. All that remains to do is to add it to the relevant focus trees:

image (11).png

I really look forward to seeing all the cool stuff you can come up with the focus inlay windows. And I hope you all enjoy the new modding constructs.

Happy modding!

 
  • 44Like
  • 10Love
  • 7
  • 1
Reactions:
how easy will it be to replicate the inner circle mechanics for any other country? can't wait to play around with those mechanics and find out what you can do with that!

also in some of the dev streams ive seen that there is a very usefull new command to enble fa, focus.nocheck and focus.ignoreprerequisites all in one which will definitivly be a huge timesafer, soo whats the command?
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Do focus trees really need to be as big as they're getting? It becomes more and more work to get through them the bigger they get.
 
  • 4
  • 2
Reactions:
how easy will it be to replicate the inner circle mechanics for any other country? can't wait to play around with those mechanics and find out what you can do with that!

also in some of the dev streams ive seen that there is a very usefull new command to enble fa, focus.nocheck and focus.ignoreprerequisites all in one which will definitivly be a huge timesafer, soo whats the command?
As for how difficult it is to make a mechanic like that, I don’t personally know. However, it’s 100% scripted so you can do it.

ff is the command your looking forward to.
 
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
I know this isn't the most closely-tied topic, but can we get the airbase UI to stretch down further, please? There's no reason to keep all that dead vertical space, when we could potentially see twice or three times as many air wings without scrolling.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Does the dynamic state rename also works with victory points, or does it only aply to states?
No it works with province names as well (victory points), at a quick glance I can say that we have at least one province with at least 7 different names. Can you find it (after release, that is)?
 
  • 4
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Thanks for the post, I actually found the performance summary really fascinating. Based on your findings, what are the big hitters in terms of current computing calcs and I take it this is the first step towards fixing some of them?

Love the game but as you say, despite having a relatively up to date PC, the game doesn't perform well after around 1945 for me - especially with all the countries defragged at the start. Looking forward to learning more!
 
i know there are some generic decisions that will run for every country that fits the criteria, for example if it is your puppet or so.
then it will automatically show a decision for all your puppets and you can get them an effect for example a cosmetic tag to changes its color to yours to so, but afaik those effects are always the same, considering it is technically just one decision that gets repeated for all your puppets,

can it be possible to make the effects different aswell, for example with variables? so we dont say anymore set_cosmetic_tag = ColorXYZ_GER and all the countries get the same colors but more like: set_cosmetic_tag = color_$PUPPET$_01
so it automatically creates a unique cosmetc tag for every puppet which we just have to give a name/color/flag, etc
afaik those variables only work on localisation files but it would be great if something like that could work on effects/cosmetic tags aswell

edit: just to make it clear, i created the Puppet-flags&colors mod, i have unique puppet flags for all the countries in hoi4, i create the flags every single time and it is no issue but i always had to do a seperate decision for every puppet aswell even tho the cosmectic tag only differs slightly
(For
germany as a puppet of the ussr:
SOV_GER_PUP

Italy as a puppet of the ussr:
SOV_ITA_PUP
etc)

so i always created a decision for every single country, but a possibility of somthing that just checks if it is a puppet and then sets a cosmetic tag like: SOV_$PuppetTAG$_PUP or so
I know in localisation, we don’t need to create a cosmetic tag but for flags, we need to do that. I hope they will be made possible without do cosmetic tag to do for example FRA_VIN_subject flag.



Also, I want they made a way to create new events type mor easy, like country_event, news_event,… Or to made the options scrolling if we have more than 2.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
With the size of the focus trees, do you think there's been an issue with political power deflation? That there is less value in each individual focus and more competing things to spend it on?
 
Would it be possible to add the option to show every affected country, instead of having to figure out who "United Kingdom, France, and 32 others" are?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
With all due respect, that may be a sign that the focus trees are starting to get out of hand.

I appreciate all that Paradox has done to deepen the focus trees. The trees at launch really were bare bones and kind of dull. Whenever I play my beloved Australia I really feel the difference between it and the USA, Poland, Mexico ... but then there are trees like the USSR's that can't even fit on a single page. Players have to alt-tab between two wiki pages to stay across it. And half the focuses have a different name if you flip ideology, which makes navigation even harder. I fear that the German tree is going to be the same after launch - and Germany is the nation that many players choose as their 'learn the game' nation.

New features like hiding exclusive tree branches and flagging (literally, with giant flags) the historical path in the new German tree are fantastic, I love these and I hope we get them for all trees in future. But they're also a sign that the trees are become so unwieldy to the point that players need giant flashing UI props so that they don't get lost in the bamboozling detail of it all.
I do think that's because either they cut a lot of 70-day focuses there to fit more focuses there, which is something i'm appreciated but they need to limit it to not cluttering the focus tree too much... (and this is what are you actually complaining, methinks)

Or they wanted to make the focus tree running up until late 40s-early 50s, which is very fine by me.
 
Asking about the state and province names, what about changed name when you're technically still in your ideology but has decolonized?

Example: The colonial government of Dutch East Indies (neutrality) changed into Islamic Republic of Indonesia (neutrality) and renamed Batavia into Djakarta

Can we use the new state naming mechanic to implement that or we would still use the old "scripted trigger + scripted effects" combination?
 
With all due respect, that may be a sign that the focus trees are starting to get out of hand.
Do focus trees really need to be as big as they're getting? It becomes more and more work to get through them the bigger they get.
I'm a big fan of BftB and TOA BRA. Both have rather large focus trees. What I like about them:
  1. Exploring focus trees is fun in itself even before you start your first game. Many hours of enjoyment of charting the best path, comparing leader bonuses, minmaxing related RnD schedule and PP allocation to advisors, economic laws etc. Big trees are double fun -- first you explore, then you play.
  2. It's good that one cannot complete all focuses before an all-out war starts and in case of really huge focus trees like BftB -- cannot even complete all focuses before the fighting is over. That forces the player to weigh pros and cons and make a choice.
  3. Even for a given ideology path there're many ways to go through. E.g. I like Communist TOA BRA but even if I stay strictly Communist path I can go for land wars earlier yet lose lots of free ships from focuses (including coveted BBs) or do it the other way around. That adds a lot of replayability.
This is certianly just what I like about them personally and may not be the kind of HOI4 other people prefer. And at least for me personally, it took some time to adapt to huge BftB tree. Even rather large "old way" HOI4 trees could be completed at least before the end of the war. So you spend some time on exploration, define the best path and then this is it -- you've minmaxed, there's no more fun. With huge focus trees I had a period of FOMO :p, an uneasiness of "leaving money on the table". But once you adapt they're more fun IMHO.

But there're major downsides IMHO:
  1. E.g. with TOA BRA you get so many free anything from focuses -- CIVs, MILs, ships, added productivity and productivity growth, a roster of spies as if you're already a Faction Leader and not an aspiring major minor etc. Yet making too many focuses mere stepping stone to those that really matter is boring as well. Don't have information but I suspect that harsh MEFO debuff might be a try at balancing out too many focus bonuses.
  2. Since updating focus trees take so much time and one gets so much buffs with "new HOI4" approach, it basically means each DLC makes countries that were updated 2-3 DLCs ago or older rather not fun to play :( May be it's intentional -- motivate people pay for new DLCs -- may be unintentional but reading some many complaints about trees being outdated it's the new normal IMHO.
 
Last edited:
Does the new localization system allow us to putting custom localisation in the GUI, example, changing Field Marshal to General for USA????
In theory you can use context aware tooltips and context aware text. However, these requires that a localization context is provided and the old parts (read most of the GUIs, there are some exceptions such as focus trees) don't have a context at the moment. So in practice, changing old content like this is very unlikely to work for old content.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
Asking about the state and province names, what about changed name when you're technically still in your ideology but has decolonized?

Example: The colonial government of Dutch East Indies (neutrality) changed into Islamic Republic of Indonesia (neutrality) and renamed Batavia into Djakarta

Can we use the new state naming mechanic to implement that or we would still use the old "scripted trigger + scripted effects" combination?
The state and province names doesn't have anything to do with ideology. That was a whish/question from this thread on the forum.

As for the example, I doubt that it will work since you use the wording "changed" mean that it's likely still the same original tag.
 
  • 3
  • 1Like
Reactions: