• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Developer diary | Performance & Modding

Hello everyone, it's again the time to give you a glimpse into the fun stuff we've been doing from the tech side. You know, in addition to implementing the new features. This time around, I PDXen got the honour to write the Developer Diary.

I'm gonna start off with some outdated news from the past: Did you know that we did a performance pass on Trial of Allegiance? I honestly hope that you didn't. Being a country pack, we never intended to improve the performance but we did make improvements to counter the influx of data that happens when we add more content.

But I know you don't want to listen to ramblings about the past. So let's get started on what we've done this time. While we've taken time to look at the performance and improve parts of it, we've also added some new generic features that we hope our modders will like.

Performance

I'm gonna be brutally honest with you from the start: The performance goal of this DLC was to not decay performance. (Un)fortunately, this doesn't mean we can lean back and ignore it. More content and new features all add to the computations we need to run and I wanted all the new stuff to happen at net-zero performance cost. Essentially, the same thing as for Trial of Allegiance, but with much more. So we had to do something to maintain the status quo with performance.

So whenever our performance tracking indicated a slowdown for the first time I took a look at what we could optimize and became a bit disheartened. The French Paradox did a very good job at parallelising much of our code for AAT. There were not many easy options for parallelisation left but we managed to identify a few places. Even on our machines with quite a lot of cores, this wasn’t enough so we took a step back and looked at optimizing the sequential parts of the code. I hope this is quite good news for all of us that run on hardware with fewer cores.

The hunt for optimization opportunities led to looking at old systems that now had more data and the uncharted lands of legacy code. I’m just gonna give you a few tidbits of old systems that we found interesting assumptions about the data in or simply interesting ways of solving it.

Focuses
I imagine some of you have been with us from the start. Do you remember the size of the original focus trees? And for those of you who don't, simply open up the generic tree to get an idea. Over the years, we've had a large influx of focuses in the focus trees. For example, we have ~60 in the generic focus tree compared to the ~180 national focuses in Belgium, not counting the Belgian-Congo part. And the size of the Belgium focus tree doesn't even compare to the new German one (which is somewhere between 350 and 400 focuses).


German focus tree.png

The new German focus tree with 350-400 focuses, which I couldn’t even fit into a 2k screen.


Belgium focus tree.png

The new Belgium focus tree with ~180 focuses.


Haiti focus tree.png

The Haiti docs tree is using the generic focus tree with ~60 focuses.


The size in itself is not that much of a problem since you generally don’t have the focus tree open at all times. However, we have a nifty functionality to bypass focus. Over time this function has taken more and more performance to run. Guess why? It checked every single focus in the game, every single time. At some point in time that might not have been an issue but with the size of the current focus trees? The good thing is that it’s not as bad anymore. We now only check the focus that has a remote chance of being bypassed.


Dynamic memory and Parallelism
When we started looking at the sequential parts of our parallel code we found a quite interesting trend. There's a lot of dynamic memory allocation. Now every time we do something that requires dynamic memory allocation, the operative system may grab a global lock. Essentially, risking the algorithm to become at least partially sequential. Finding this caused a period of going through the code and eliminating the worst of these dynamic memory allocations.


Hidden AAT Inefficiencies
AAT was the expansion that optimized HoI4 (in modern times). Now there’s a drawback with the drastically improved performance: All the inefficiencies from the new systems in AAT were hidden by the drastic improvements in the rest of the game. A lot of old content was optimized by a large margin, and as a result new performance overhead simply got lost in the steadily improving numbers. For example, on my machine disabling the international market automation saved me 2ms per daily update. It’s not a lot (about 0.5% of the overall performance on my machine). But for market automation? Good news, it’s way less now. Bad news, you can still improve performance a very small amount by disabling it (though, manually clicking will have way worse performance in terms of speed).

Another hidden inefficiency that we’ve found is the increase in the number of equipment variants. Before, there was a very limited amount of equipment variants in a game but now, there’s a lot of them. Every single MIO update can create a multitude of different variants. And not to mention that International Market and Lend Lease pass these variants around in the game. Now throughout the code base, there are a lot of things that interact with equipment. Every interaction wasn’t adding much but all put together, that’s quite a bit. I won’t say that variants are free but please go ahead and add more, there should be less performance impact now than before at least.


Modding
Now let’s leave the area of performance and continue with some other things we’ve looked at from the tech side: New fancy modding stuff. During the development, I got a bit fed up with requests for support for new tooltips. So we sat down and thought: How can we get content developers to write the tooltips themselves? While we couldn't backport Jomini to HoI4, we took some inspiration and made it possible to write more complex tooltips in the GUI and script files.

Localization, Localization and Localization
If you have looked into our localization files before, you've probably noticed something like the following:

image.png

Traditionally, this meant that `REASON` was replaced with something that was provided by the game (i.e. not scripteD). In many cases, these variables were just replaced with some other localized string. So to avoid having to update the source code every time we wanted to change this, we introduced a new concept to the scripting language: Bound localization.

Bound localization simply allows you to bind variables to the localization from script. So instead of opening up the source code, we can now simply update the script files like the following:

image (1).png


bound localizationpng.png

The localization for the sort by name button injects the sort key from script to localization.

Oh, and did I mention that it’s recursive so you can do stuff like this if you want to:

image (2).png

Naturally, doing this was opening up Pandora's box with requests from some content developers so we continued a bit more to push the boundaries. For example, in the german focus tree we can find the following odd syntax:

image (3).png


Custom effect tooltip.png

The custom effect tooltip that shows the state modifiers for a dam with a custom indentation to fit this very specific tooltip.

This adds another new concept we introduced: localization formatters. Essentially, it allows you to get a localized text property of some static token (in this case then state modifiers for
the `dam` building). You’ll recognize a text formatter when you see a localization key that has the format `<formatter>|<token>`. Some of the formatters also take some parameters (such as the `INDENT` in the example above). The benefit of using these over new tooltip overrides for effects or triggers is that the localization formatters are usable in every place a bound localization is usable (some might require that it’s localized with some context but that should be documented).

One of the main drawbacks with the new things we add, is that you can in general only use it in specific places that is pointed out from source code. Unfortunately, this still holds for the new stuff but the goal was for fewer requests for tooltips so we made some effort to make it a bit more usable. For example, you can use this in the very much (ab)used `custom_effect_tooltip` effect, `custom_trigger_tooltip` trigger as well as in some of the new places (see for example, the building database). But the main thing is that we added support for this in GUI files.

All our GUItypes now support the new tooltip `bound_tooltip` construct. If you use this, then you'll be able to use the bound localization. And maybe more interesting is the `context_aware_tooltip` construct that is a bound localization but it will be localized with a context so you can use contextual localization. Unfortunately, this requires us to provide the context from the source so mostly new places support this (and we try to document it in the GUI files, when and where it is supported). Note that this is recursive so if a parent object is localised with a context, then all children objects will be localized with the same context.

We'll come back to this in a short while when digging into the tech behind the new inner circle GUI in the focus tree.

Naming is Hard
Imagine that you have a province or state that, depending on who you ask, has a different name. For techs, equipment and a lot of other things we’ve had the support to add country specific names (we call it cosmetic tags) by simply adding the countries tag before the name of it. Now we’ve added the same support to province and state names as well.

We can take Turku as an example, this Finish area has both a Finish and a Swedish name (Turku being the name in Finish and Åbo is the name in Swedish). Before we had quite some script to change the name of the state depending on its owner but now we simply have to prefix the name with the correct country tag in the localization file:


image (4).png


Turku.png

The state of Turku (i.e. Finland owns the state).

Åbo.png

The state of Åbo (i.e. Sweden owns the state).

Focus Navigation
More national focus means more fun, right? But at some point it just becomes hard to navigate the focus tree. Fear not, we’ve added an option to add navigation shortcuts to focus trees. The new German tree has 6 different navigation icons (when I’m writing this).

Focus navigation tab.png

The focus navigation tabs for the new German tree.

If we click for example the “Economy” navigation tab, then we’ll be moved to the economy section of the tree with a nice zoom level for it. Naturally, this is completely scriptable so you can modify the focus trees to your liking for your mods.

Focus Inlay Windows
You've probably seen the Inner Circle GUI in another Dev Diary by now, but did you know that the whole GUI is written in script, and it doesn’t contain a single scripted GUI window? The inner circle is the first usage of what we call focus inlay window. A focus inlay window is, similar to the continuous focus window, a GUI object that is drawn inside the focus tree view..

Let’s go through an example: We want to display all the potential members of the Nordic Defence Council and if they have joined. For some reason it’s also very critical for us that we show the leaders of the countries. Something like the following:

The Nordic Defense Council.png

A focus inlay window to show the potential members of The Nordic Defense Council with access to the joint focus tree.

When defining a new inlay window, there's three main components that you need to implement: The inlay window definition; the GUI definition; and add it to the focus tree(s) it should be shown. Let's start with the completely new construct, the inlay window definition.

As for most components in HoI4 different databases have different folders and so has this. The inlay windows are located in the `game/common/focus_inlay_windows/` and we can throw up the first definition of the inlay window as follows:

image (5).png

This is actually a minimum working example for a focus inlay window definition. We've now a new inlay window with ID `nordic_alliance_inlay_window` that points to a container window named `nordic_alliance_ui_window`. Let's continue with adding more stuff to this later on and continue with the GUI itself.

image (6).png

The GUI components aren't anything new, but I've thrown in some of the new localization capabilities to give you an example. Since all focus inlay windows are localised with the focus tree country as the context, we're free to use all the new fancy stuff when writing the localization. We have one `context_aware_text` that uses the contextual localization to grab the faction name. Another that uses bound localization to localise `NORDIC_COUNCIL_MEMBER` with the parameters `IN_FACTION` and `COUNTRY` with the result from localising `[SWE.NordicCouncilMemberInFaction]` and `[SWE.GetNameWithFlag]`, respectively. I’ve also thrown in a `context_aware_tooltip` to get the name of the leader when hovering over the portrait.

While we're at it, we can complete the localization by adding the following scripted localization to the game (in `game/common/scripted_localisation`):

image (7).png

And add the localization key `NORDIC_COUNCIL_MEMBER` to a loc file:

image (8).png

With the localization done we only need to fix the portraits of the country leaders. Defining dynamic images for focus inlay windows is done in the focus inlay window definition:

image (9).png

The `scripted_images` entry contains a list of image definitions that will be used in the focus inlay window. In this case, the icon named `Sweden` will have its image replaced with `GFX_portrait_SWE_per_albin_hansson` if Swedens’ current country leader is `SWE_per_albin_hansson`. If this doesn’t hold, then the next entry in `Sweden` will be checked and so on until something that evaluates to true is encountered. The last entry in this example (`GFX_blank_leader_portrait`) always evaluates to true and is therefore the default image if no other is true.

Now there’s only some final touches to be made. Firstly, we’ll restrict the inlay window to only be shown if the country has formed (or joined) a Nordic joint alliance (i.e. has completed the `NORDIC_form_joint_alliance`. Secondly, we’ll set the window to only be visible to the country owning the focus tree (so no other player can view it).

image (10).png

That’s it, really. We’ve now completely defined a focus inlay window. All that remains to do is to add it to the relevant focus trees:

image (11).png

I really look forward to seeing all the cool stuff you can come up with the focus inlay windows. And I hope you all enjoy the new modding constructs.

Happy modding!

 
  • 44Like
  • 10Love
  • 7
  • 1
Reactions:
ok so with all my questions and stuff (still hope that variables in cosmetic tags will be possible one day) i completly forgot to say that the changes are still great to see and i am looking forward to it to work with the new possibilities
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The state and province names doesn't have anything to do with ideology. That was a whish/question from this thread on the forum.

As for the example, I doubt that it will work since you use the wording "changed" mean that it's likely still the same original tag.
Yup, still using the same INS tag. Hence my question about that.

But well, guess i'll stick with the scripted trigger-effects for now.
 
1731400436919.png

can the localisation for those be ideology specific? i know that special foci can have different names depending on the ideology you have (KDF wagen, Wilhelmwagen, Volkswagen, Herman Görin werke, Kaiserwerke, etc)
so that for democratic germany it is not called Wehrmacht but rather Bundeswehr or Reichswehr, or Nationale Volskarmee for communist Germany
Kaiserliche marine instead of Kriegsmarine etc
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
Reactions:
Here is a question about the name of states/provinces in the localisation. Firstly, thank you, this is a great thing. And secondly, the question about ideology, I think you've already spoken about it, but I didn't understand it completely. Will it be possible for the name to depend on the ideology or whether it is a subject of a particular country? As far as I understand, this will not be the case for cosmetic tags.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Here is a question about the name of states/provinces in the localisation. Firstly, thank you, this is a great thing. And secondly, the question about ideology, I think you've already spoken about it, but I didn't understand it completely. Will it be possible for the name to depend on the ideology or whether it is a subject of a particular country? As far as I understand, this will not be the case for cosmetic tags.
No, the cosmetic names are only based on original tags.
 
  • 5
Reactions:
The state and province names doesn't have anything to do with ideology. That was a whish/question from this thread on the forum.

As for the example, I doubt that it will work since you use the wording "changed" mean that it's likely still the same original tag.
Can tou, please, clarify, what code will be used for Victory Points localization for different tags? Will it be like this:
VICTORY_POINTS_1234: "City"
GER_VICTORY_POINTS_1234: "Germanic City"
 
View attachment 1215163
can the localisation for those be ideology specific? i know that special foci can have different names depending on the ideology you have (KDF wagen, Wilhelmwagen, Volkswagen, Herman Görin werke, Kaiserwerke, etc)
so that for democratic germany it is not called Wehrmacht but rather Bundeswehr or Reichswehr, or Nationale Volskarmee for communist Germany
Kaiserliche marine instead of Kriegsmarine etc
Currently, no. These strings are neither contextually localized nor supporting bound localizations.
 
  • 4
Reactions:
Can tou, please, clarify, what code will be used for Victory Points localization for different tags? Will it be like this:
VICTORY_POINTS_1234: "City"
GER_VICTORY_POINTS_1234: "Germanic City"
Yes, that looks correct. If the original tag is GER then "Germanic City" will be shown and otherwise "City".
 
  • 4Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Something that struck me, as I am interested in history. In the focus navigation for Germany, the same eagle is used with a rather unoriginal branch symbol.

Each branch in the German military had their own style of eagle. Is this something that you could make more historical?
 
The Ruhr Dam needs an H :)
There is actually also a river Rur (or Roer in Dutch). The Germans broke the dams in early 45 to flood the fields in the Netherlands and delay the Allied advance.

Otherwise, the Ruhr river is deeper in Germany in the Ruhr area, a former black coal mining area.
 
Last edited: