- Dec 14, 1999
- 22.085
- 263.848
So, indirectly, this makes smaller, taller empires an edge on technological development (as well as the perks of having the institutions), doesn't it?
yes
- 36
- 15
So, indirectly, this makes smaller, taller empires an edge on technological development (as well as the perks of having the institutions), doesn't it?
So according to this north africa would be at the same level of institutions and tech as Castile/France/England (through Gibraltar), and maybe more than Austria/Poland/Ottomans/Russia??
I really don't like it. The spread of Westernization was bad enough already.
That would be awful too.
I agree that a good human player should be able to change history a little but I really don't like systems that evens the game to get very ahistorical results like a super teched Tunis.
@Johan
There are so many institutions that provide such a big penalty (especially when stacked) that unless they spread to neighboring countries at lightning speed it is easy to see that the ROTW will yet again be in a terrible, terrible position really, really fast. This new system seems to be really harsh for everyone in Asia but it hits Sub-Saharans the most that by 1550 should have an 80% penalty to tech and it only gets worse as time passes by unless one expands really fast into... Europe. But how can one do that with a terrible unbalance research typical of ROTW starts whenever trying to expand (especially bad when combined with bad rulers). A
This is another game (observermode)
Its the spread of Manufactories Institution, which enables after 1650, in 1669 and in 1709.
![]()
and...
![]()
Overhauling the tech groups counts as balancing for me, balancing is part of patches, which are free.