• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Welcome to the 24th development diary for our empire building game Europa Universalis IV and today we turn our eyes to one of the most interesting nations and a favorite because of its location and variety – The Ottoman Empire.

Ottoman Possibilities

When your story begins in the Grand Campaign, the Empire prospers under the rule of a line of committed and effective Sultans. In fact, we take our starting date from the dramatic Ottoman victory over an alliance of Christian monarchs at Vama in November, 1444. The Ottomans have flourished economically due to their control of the major overland trade routes between Europe and Asia. The Ottoman Empire is one of the most powerful states in the world – a multinational, multilingual empire.

Will you be able to reign and expand your empire over three continents? Will you be able to become a dominant naval force, controlling much of the Mediterranean Sea as well as become a major player of the European continental political sphere? Will you become the only power with a just claim to the title of universal ruler?

Or will your military and bureaucratic structures come under strain after a protracted period of misrule by weak Sultans. Will you fall behind the Europeans in military technology as the innovation that fed the Empire's forceful expansion became stifled by growing religious and intellectual conservatism? And will the discovery of new maritime trade routes by Western European states allowed them to avoid the Ottoman trade monopoly unless you take over the trade routes?

Choose, and choose wisely. Let the game begin.

Most players make an immediate move to eliminate Constantinople, the capital of a now tiny and irrelevant Byzantine Empire. Turkish missions push you in this direction, too, and it’s a natural opening act (once the Western border is secure). Taking this rich city means controlling all traffic to the Black Sea, greater ability to limit European land incursions into the core Turkish provinces in Anatolia, and a chance to move the capital to the greatest city on earth.

But Turkish expansion is a double-edged sword no matter which direction you go. If you continue to move into Europe, you will add Orthodox and Catholic provinces to a realm already teeming with non-Muslim citizens. Expand west to consolidate your holdings in Asia and you risk alienating Muslim rulers that would be better as allies. And to the South you have the Mameluks, a potential rival for power over the Levant.
The Ottomans start in 1444 with a lot of assets, some in the form of ideas and missions we’ll get to in a bit. They also have a navy that competes only with Venice for power in the Eastern Mediterranean, a starting Sultan of great ability and – for the moment – military superiority to or parity with the European monarchs that wish to drive Islam of the continent.

Ottoman Dynamic Historical Events
As a major power throughout this period, we have written quite a lot of events for the Ottoman Empire, but there are two event series that truly stand out.

The Provincial System
The Empire contains numerous provinces and vassal states, and many were under the control of Beys, provincial governors that ruled over these districts as a general would on the battlefield. Historically, this worked well to keep the Empire running smoothly with local initiative to handle local problems in a land too varied for a one-size fits all policy. But it also depended on a Sultan that knew how to rein them in. In Europa Universalis IV, local Beys, especially in far-off provinces, may demand more autonomy in form of a Provincial System to stay loyal to the Sultan. If they are given too much autonomy, though, you might have problems with corruption of the Beys or revolts from unhappy soldiers that don’t respect the system in place. But then suppression has its own cost if the Beys band together to simultaneously rise against the Sultan...It’s a balancing act that comes into play if the Empire grows too large.

The Janissaries
The Janissaries were the heart of the Ottoman army, and through reforms and granting them more and more rights, the player as Sultan may build up his Janissaries into the elite infantry they represented historically. But beware! Granting them too much power might lead to their decadence, or worse, becoming a threat to the Sultan. Palace Coups or revolts might follow, and in the end, disbanding them might be the only alternative. Can you risk weakening your army in the short term while you find new sources of power?
Both of these event series represent the core problems facing the Ottoman Empire through this period. With a strong Sultan, you can make up for more inefficient government or a slightly weaker infantry, since you can spend your Monarch Power Points to shore up problems caused by a multinational, dispersed and devolutionary government. But a series of weak rules in an Empire that needs to constantly reinforce its legitimacy will face grave repercussions.

Ottoman National Ideas
The Ottoman Empire starts with a 10% bonus to its army discipline, and creates core provinces 33% faster and more cheaply.
  1. Ghazi: +33% Religious Unity & increase manpower when fighting religious enemies.
    Ghazi is a title given to great Muslim warriors, analogous to Khan or Caesar or Johan. It was also a term given to Ottoman warriors that spearheaded Turkish invasions and raids into non-Muslim land. Fight the enemies of Muhammad, and the nation will rally around you.
  2. Timariot System: +15% cavalry power.
    The Timariot Sipahi cavalry were, with the Janissaries, an elite core of troops within the Ottoman army. Tightly connected to the bey system, Timariot soldiers were given land in return for service, ensuring their loyalty.
  3. Autonomous Pashas: -3 Max War exhaustion.
    Powerful and respect governors and generals became known as Pashas. It came with great honors and responsibilities and those given control of territory within the empire became great lords that would work hard to preserve their privileges.
  4. Ottoman Tolerance: +3 Tolerance Heretic, +3 Tolerance Heathen.
    As was customary in many Muslim empires of the Middle Ages and Renaissance, non-Muslims were not forced to convert not were they regularly harassed beyond the occasional higher tax. In Europa Universalis IV the Ottomans have a much lower chance of religious revolts because of this tolerance.
  5. Law code of Suleiman: +10% Tax Income.
    Suleiman is one of the great rulers of history – a soldier, a lawmaker and a reformer. In fact, where the West knows him as Suleiman the Great or Magnificent, in his homeland he is called The Lawgiver. A central part of his reforms was re-examining the taxation of Turks, especially taxes levied on Jews and Christians, taxes for manufactured goods and anti-corruption measures.
  6. Tulip Period: +10% Trade Income.
    Named for the high priced flower that became a symbol of refinement, the Tulip Period was an early 18th century attempt to Westernize the Empire. A strong viziers and a time of peace allowed the Ottomans to focus on new trade relations and greater experimentation with foreign art and architectural styles. It was also a decade of decadence and distraction, in the eyes of many Turks, and subsequent failures on the battlefield ended this period of innovation and garden parties.
  7. Imperial School of Naval Engineering: 20% cheaper ships.
    Always a major naval power in its region, the Ottomans didn’t found a proper naval academy until the 1770s. Naval engineering was one of the centerpieces of the curriculum.

When the Ottoman Empire has reached it full capabilities and unlocked all of its National Ideas, it also get a +20% bonus to manpower recovery speed. With these ideas, they are a really expansionist military country, that have far fewer problems with holding a realm with diverse religion. Lower war exhaustion and stronger religious unity in the early game will help greatly with the rapid growth the Ottomans need to keep from falling too far behind its Western neighbors.
attachment.php


Bonus Detail: Westernization

Experienced players are now thinking about how to goose the Ottomans so they can remain a dominant military and technological power. As you know, the Western tech group gains knowledge faster than others, and as the Ottomans do not belong to it they will eventually trail them.

In the original version of Europa Universalis III, you could sometimes get a random event (if the stars aligned) and you could upgrade into a better technology group. With later expansions this was transformed into a set of complex decisions and events that worked fine for the power user that understood all the consequences, but had severe drawbacks for new users and the AI. Westernization should be an option, but it should also be a clear statement of policy, not something you stumble or exploit your way into.

In Europa Universalis IV, Westernization is a completely defined feature, integrated in the technology system. If you don't belong to the Western technology group, you will now always see whether you have the chance to “level up”.

To start the westernization process, you need to have a neighbor of the Western tech group that is a fair number of levels ahead of you in technology, and you also need to have +3 stability. When you start the process, your stability drops to -3 and all your monarch power is wiped. You have switched to the western technology group, but you paid a heavy price for undoing centuries of tradition.

Then, each month, your progress towards being fully Western goes either forward or backwards. It can never go below 1%, but when you reach 100% you end the process, and get western units as well. So how does the progress work? Well, every month, your current stability is added to the progress. And there are fun events giving you -1 stability or hurting you somewhere else. Westernization should not be a decision taken lightly, especially for large empires. Your nobles and people will often resist and you may need to slow down your progress from time to time to avoid larger pains.

And yes, as a New World nation you can switch directly to western once the Europeans show up, but you have a fair amount of catching up to do anyway.
 

Attachments

  • eu4_16.png
    eu4_16.png
    2,5 MB · Views: 47.389
Lol. The Ottomans led to the almost extinction of Orthodox christianity in Ottoman lands. So sharia law is tolerant to you? What about kidnapping tens of thousands of young non-muslim girls and forcing them into prostitution?
There was me thinking the Ottomans had their own sets of laws compared to Sharia Law.

However, thank you for explaining why Serbia, Greece, Romania and Bulgaria are strongly muslim nations!
 
I hoped that you were progressing. Appearance of Monarch Points made me think about new fresh westerinization system.
Instead, we got old, tasteless and ugly soup.

Requirement of western neighbour is absurd as many previous readers already showed why.

In my opinion tech groups should be molden into the Periodization.
Countries in new world could get into their newer ages and countries in old world wouldn't rest on their laurels.

Some requirement is necessary... same continent would be enough to prevent Americas from westernizing too early and allow the Ottomans to jump on board w/o direct borders with, say, England.
 
Easy, Easy. It's easy to laugh at it now, but your country was not always a hotbed of tolerance. How many Muslims did it allow within its borders during EUIV timeframe?

I have a hard time believing the Ottomans were the most tolerant on the face of the planet at the time. They were certainly not more tolerant than some regimes and peoples of antiquity. They were tolerant to be muslims, I think that is the most correct way to put it.
 
I have a hard time believing the Ottomans were the most tolerant on the face of the planet at the time. They were certainly not more tolerant than some regimes and peoples of antiquity. They were tolerant to be muslims, I think that is the most correct way to put it.

The state in 1444 was majority Christian, and most of those Christians were being ruled via their pre-Ottoman local laws; Ottoman Kanun enabled them to have this freedom.
 
I have a hard time believing the Ottomans were the most tolerant on the face of the planet at the time. They were certainly not more tolerant than some regimes and peoples of antiquity. They were tolerant to be muslims, I think that is the most correct way to put it.

We could say that they were most tolerant of Muslims (even though this wasn't the case).

No, you are right, they are not the most tolerant regime of antiquity, but here's what's WIKI finding so special about them: "Ottoman religious tolerance was notable for being much better than that which existed elsewhere in other great past or contemporary empires".

So, we are talking empires and religious tolerance and EUIV timeframe.
 
Holy Roman Empire is the Roman empire doy, pope said so when Charlemagne was emperor.

The Holy Roman Empire is the least legitimate successor of Rome. Even nations that lay no claim at all to the title are more legitimate. Hell, Ghana is a better successor than the HRE.
 
Which misses the point that your approach allow native americans to westernize before they even meet westerners. Which is a bit too extreme. Some contact with westerners should be part of the picture of westernizing.
 
Which misses the point that your approach allow native americans to westernize before they even meet westerners. Which is a bit too extreme. Some contact with westerners should be part of the picture of westernizing.
That's why I had written in previous post that I would change westernization into periodization.
 
The state in 1444 was majority Christian, and most of those Christians were being ruled via their pre-Ottoman local laws; Ottoman Kanun enabled them to have this freedom.

They had this freedom ONLY, if they accepted being treated as second class citizens. See dhimmi. That's kind of like saying we tolerate you if you tolerate us not tolerating you.
 
They had this freedom ONLY, if they accepted being treated as second class citizens. See dhimmi. That's kind of like saying we tolerate you if you tolerate us not tolerating you.

I think the point is that the Ottomans were more tolerant than Christian Europeans, not that they were the perfect example of tolerance...
 
Since I prefer Ottomans over Byzantines (silly byzantophiles :p ) this DD makes me happy. Now I just have to decide which country I want to play more, England or Ottomans. Decisions decisions
 
I like the Ottoman stuff, but westernisation seems too easy. Will the AI choose to go down that route (and if you have a presence in Asia at a historical time for England you will encounter mostly westernised nations)? Or is this a player only bonus?
 
They had this freedom ONLY, if they accepted being treated as second class citizens. See dhimmi. That's kind of like saying we tolerate you if you tolerate us not tolerating you.

Given that the European standard at the time was "We tolerate you if you tolerate us brutally forcing you out of the country at swordpoint or outright killing you.", that's an improvement.
 
Ottoman tolerance was unique at this time. Not compared to modern thinking of course, but for this era, sure. I'm still uncertain with the whole westernization thing, it's hard to judge before seing it happen. I do believe that some other contact could make up for bordering a western nation, like some trade agreement with a western country (India, Indonesia, China, Japan...) or perhaps refugees or guest instructors (Russia, Poland...)

In the few historical examples we have of this, the route to modernization wasn't paved overnight, and often (speaking military reforms) it was paved with diplomacy.

On the mantle of Rome. "The Holy Roman Empire is neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire" - Voltaire
 
I like the Ottoman stuff, but westernisation seems too easy. Will the AI choose to go down that route (and if you have a presence in Asia at a historical time for England you will encounter mostly westernised nations)? Or is this a player only bonus?

The DD seems to imply that the AI can and will westernize. However, it also suggests that westernization is no longer going to provide an immediate technological boost. The complete wipe of monarch points and the lack of monthly investment from the neighbor bonus means that you or the AI still need to focus on research if you want to benefit from westernizing.
 
The DD seems to imply that the AI can and will westernize. However, it also suggests that westernization is no longer going to provide an immediate technological boost. The complete wipe of monarch points and the lack of monthly investment from the neighbor bonus means that you or the AI still need to focus on research if you want to benefit from westernizing.

Do you want China to be able to westernise immediatly if you started the game in 1600? Will the AI do it every time even though its didn't happen historically?

ehh, its based on what peter did for Russia in the early 18th century.

Economically at least the effect on economic growth of Russia's reforms under Peter over the long term place it behind China (rather than close to Western Europe). A detailed analysis of the facts is here - http://old.uchitel-izd.ru/data/SEH/Vol.3.1/06 Meliantsev.rtf.

Personally I see that as justification for simulating Peter's reforms as someone with good monarch stats, but no long term impact.