• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

HoI 4 Dev Diary - Nationalist China

Hi and welcome! Today we announced the expansion we have been working on for the last couple of months: Waking the Tiger. The names comes from a quote by Mao: “When waking a tiger, use a long stick”. A major theme in the expansion is Asia, with a special focus on China. We will be presenting focus trees and other content leading up to release, as well as going over other features we haven't shown off yet. But first a word on the expansion pass:

The expansion pass for HOI4 was the first one we’ve done, and we’ve learned many lessons.

For example, we decided to release "Death or Dishonor" as a country pack rather than a full-sized expansion so that we could still release something cool during a period of time when we were busy staffing up and focusing on technical issues. We saw that with the resources we had, at the time, we couldn't release a full-sized expansion at the same time as we were spending time on improving the AI and doing other free updates to the base game, such as the significant revamp of the air combat system.

It turns out that scope changes of this type do not go well with an expansion pass if you look at the value we promised to pass-owners. So, in order to make sure we over-deliver and make everyone happy, we have decided that not only this expansion, but also the next expansion - the one after "Waking the Tiger", which is planned to be similar in scope - will also be included in the pass.

This means that the initially promised two expansions have now actually become four. This also means that we are also no longer selling the pass. So if you picked it up yesterday: jackpot!

More info about this here: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?threads/expansion-pass-faq.975687/

Now back to the regular diary!


China in 1936 was one of the most confusing and interesting countries on the planet. After a revolution in 1911 deposed the last Qing Emperor, the young republic quickly found itself ripped apart by a brutal civil war that would continue, on and off, until 1949. In 1936, the Central Government under Chiang Kai-Shek had established some measure of control over the central regions of China. A number of provincial governors, nominally under the control of Chiang, ran their provinces as essentially separate political entities. The Communists under Mao Zedong had successfully evaded annihilation and created a Base Area in Yan’an.

upload_2017-11-15_14-27-38.png


In 1931, the Japanese military had engineered a false-flag terror attack on a Japanese-owned railroad and used the “Mukden incident” to invade and occupy Manchuria, eventually setting up a puppet government under Puyi. The deposed Qing Emperor, eager to reclaim the throne that was so rudely taken from him, is unlikely to give them too much trouble. The Japanese, of course, have their own designs on China - and they don’t necessarily involve Puyi.

The stage is set for the showdown between 3 large players and 5 smaller ones, with the ultimate prize the title of Ruler of China. Historically, the conflict would lead to a savage war against Japan, causing millions of deaths. The following renewed Chinese Civil War ended up in the disgraceful retreat of Chiang Kai-Shek’s government to Taiwan, with the Communists in control of the mainland. But history need not have followed this path…


Given that the various ideologies are already well-represented in the different players in the Chinese Civil War, we have diverted from our past practice of making alternate ideology paths for every country. It made little sense to us that you would want to turn Nationalist China communist when Communist China is already a thing you can play. This also meant we didn’t have to resolve all the weird edge cases that would spring up from this (the days of Mao vs. Mao battles for control of China are sadly over).

The first new focus tree we want to show you is Nationalist China. It has consistently been one of the most requested nations and is actually one of the most played nations even with the generic focus tree. We originally looked at China as a whole during the early development of DoD, but decided that with the available resources we couldn’t do it justice. Events have proven us right, since the new decision system in particular has been critical in modelling the complex issues in China and turn it into interesting gameplay.

china_focus_tree.jpg


In 1936 Nationalist China is coming out of the brief golden age of the so-called Nanking Decade, in which the Nationalist Government tried hard to industrialize the country and build a modern system of government. Guided by the political theories of Sun Yat-Sen, founder and first president of the Republic, this rested on three pillars, called The Three Principles of the People: Nationalism, Democracy and Welfare (note that the Chinese terms have various meanings and don’t map perfectly on what we understand those words to mean).

In the game, the three principles form the start of three separate branches. The Welfare branch builds a modern welfare state, as it was envisioned by the leading experts of the time. Making the people invested in your leadership by improving their livelihood will increase their willingness to defend it against any aggressor, raising your war support. It comes at a cost, however. The Chinese economy is not yet up to the task of supporting a large welfare state, and so your government will have to make up the deficit by printing money, increasing inflation. Inflation is represented by a national spirit in 5 levels, reducing factory output and the number of civilian factories available for construction. You will have various options to reform your taxation system in the industrial branch, but they might not be popular with everyone.

Capture_inflation.JPG


The Democracy branch concerns itself with reforming the government to a state that truly deserves the name “Republic”. Part of this is the establishment of the 5 branches of government (as opposed to the three the rest of the world has to make do with): Executive, Legislative, Judiciary, Control and Examination. Creating a system of checks and balances will finally allow you to get rid of the “Ineffective Bureaucracy” spirit, which reduces conscription by 35%.

Capture_advisors.JPG


The Nationalism branch concerns itself with the struggle to unite China under your banner and defend it against foreign aggression. It offers you a fundamental choice: do you focus on uniting the country first, leading to a confrontation with the warlords and the Communists, or do you put your petty squabbles behind you to focus on defending against Japan? Or perhaps, you might want to take the fight to the Japanese directly? After all, nothing unites a people like a common enemy…

Before you do, however, it might be wise to review the state of your army, which is less than impressive. Usually under-equipped, often poorly trained and shoddily led, your army suffers crippling penalties to attack and defence until you have had the chance to reform it. Each step will have to be paid for with Army XP, meaning you will be on the back foot for a while until your army has absorbed the harsh lessons of warfare.

Capture_army_reform.JPG


The only upside in your rather bleak position is that you are, after all, the internationally recognized government of China, which offers up a large number of avenues to get outside support: German advisors can help you reorganize your officer corps and assist you in building up your tank force, while approaching the Soviet Union might gain you some desperately needed planes as well as support in developing new tanks.

The French and British will send you supplies directly through the Burma Road and Hanoi, represented by off-map factories helping you produce equipment. They may, however, withdraw the support if they wish. Should Burma be overrun, they will also be unable to help you.

Capture_burma_road_eng.JPG


Finally, the US can help you build a navy and will support you in building up a domestic aviation industry. Should you find yourself in the position to approach Japan, they can help you with modernizing your navy, although they won’t help you to the point where you may become a legitimate challenger in their own home waters.

Lastly, once you have built up your forces, it may be time to throw off the shackles the Great Powers have laid on you, and reclaim the position you were meant to have: the undisputed, unchallenged hegemon of the Eastern Hemisphere. Whether you will be a benevolent overlord or institute direct rule from Nanking is up to you.

CHI_infantry_artillery_cavalry_04 (1).jpg

The expansion will come with a bunch of new 3d models for china, more details of this in a later diary.

upload_2017-11-15_14-44-4.png

A sample of the new general pictures for nationalist china

See you all next week with another diary!

PS. The last episode of our beginner-stream with @Da9L and @bus will start at 16:00 today and run for 30 minutes and then I’ll pop in and talk a bit about the expansion. So check out the Paradox twitch today at 16:00 CET: https://go.twitch.tv/paradoxinteractive

PSS: This is not the thread to discuss the recent removal of HoI from sale in China. To discuss this issue, please go to the relevant thread: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...-iron-iv-removed-from-steam-in-china.1052971/ . Moderators will remove posts concerning this issue.

PSSS: If you missed the trailer, check it out here:
 
Well, I doubt if he really use nostalgia, I mean I can sense it a little but I never thought it would affect his overall attitude. I prefer this book rather than Jung Chang's is because he's book makes more sense than Jung Chang's. Whether he is a Maoist hack or not I have no idea, but he provided a novel thought which is not negligible.

I always thought Jung changs book was a hit piece on Mao done in the style of Maoist denunciation.

She took the conclusion she wanted. "Mao was absolutely evil" and then interprets every thing she can find as proving that. It's like how during the CR someone would be accused of being a "capitalist roader" and then, during the struggle session, a neighbor would bring up the one time he sold a melon as proof that he's a secret capitalist.

That's chang's book. Mao is never genuine beyond being evil and everything is interpreted in the most damning way possible.
 
Why is Chiang responsible for a mother having to smother a child and not Mao?

(I would hold the Japanese responsible, personally)

(Also, even though this is after Mao.. Google "One child policy" and "female infanticide" The communists unfortunately caused many many Chinese people to smother their own children.)
In this particular case, it was Chiang’s order that left us at the mercy of Japanese, and afterwords it was replaced by American G.Is. While modern textbooks don’t really touch upon this little local chapter, rest assured the G.I.s were not remembered fondly either.

Mao’s accomplishment in life did more good than bad. And by the end of the day, only history has the right to objectively judge a man of such caliber, a man in life most certainly bettered more life than any other single human being. It was because of him that China even have human rights to be “abused” to begin with, and the West is forced to take Chinese seriously because of his life work (certainly not Chiang’s if our local history with the Americans is any indication)
 
Could you please tell something with more details? I have never heard of that, which pool are you refering?

I did a year abroad at Sichuan University.

It's the two big outdoor ones near the east gate.

During the 80's, the government built over the vast majority of the grave yards.

One of my professors was the son of Sichuan University professor at the time and he saw it all. In the library there they had some maoist journal which was published on English at about 1970. It was surreal because it was written by a true believer. It was "Everything is fine. The cultural revolution is a stunning success. You can see how students from previously rival rebellion organizations are working to plaster up the bullet holes." The fact that they just had armed combat on the streets between college students using tanks didn't seem to dampen their enthusiasm for the glorious revolution.

Here's an article about another Cultural revolution graveyard in chongqing.
 
In this particular case, it was Chiang’s order that left us at the mercy of Japanese, and afterwords it was replaced by American G.Is. While modern textbooks don’t really touch upon this little local chapter, rest assured the G.I.s were not remembered fondly either.

Mao’s accomplishment in life did more good than bad. And by the end of the day, only history has the right to objectively judge a man of such caliber, a man in life most certainly bettered more life than any other single human being. It was because of him that China even have human rights to be “abused” to begin with, and the West is forced to take Chinese seriously because of his life work (certainly not Chiang’s if our local history with the Americans is any indication)

China had been at the mercy of the Japanese since the first set of 21 demands. Chiang was holding the bag when the hammer fell but that is hardly on him.

Also, American soldiers behaved badly when stationed abroad. That is very strong evidence that Mao is a good person.

It's just so clear. Bad Americans = good Mao.

Does bad British people = even better Mao?

Can we throw in some French people and = best Mao?

What good did Mao do that Liu Shaoqi, Deng Xiaoping, Zhou enlai, Peng dehaui etc. couldn't have done without him after 1950. China would be a much better place had he died right after winning the Civil War?
 
Last edited:
I did a year abroad at Sichuan University.

It's the two big outdoor ones near the east gate.

During the 80's, the government built over the vast majority of the grave yards.

One of my professors was the son of Sichuan University professor at the time and he saw it all. In the library there they had some maoist journal which was published on English at about 1970. It was surreal because it was written by a true believer. It was "Everything is fine. The cultural revolution is a stunning success. You can see how students from previously rival rebellion organizations are working to plaster up the bullet holes." The fact that they just had armed combat on the streets between college students using tanks didn't seem to dampen their enthusiasm for the glorious revolution.

Here's an article about another Cultural revolution graveyard in chongqing.

Oh, I remembered, Chongqing was one of the area that had most fierce disorder in the CR. There were a lot of group graveyard built indeed.
Before you remind me I knew there were ships involved into massive riots(Aug,8,1967), but I have no idea with tanks.
It was a complete tragedy. IIRC they were different rioting groups, holding different opinions, but all of them followed "the highest command" from Mao himself, to create riots.
 
What good did Mao do that Liu Shaoqi, Deng Xiaoping, Zhou enlai, Peng dehaui etc. couldn't have done without him after 1950. China would be a much better place had he died right after winning the Civil War?

Since when are politicians ever good people? Since when does Greatness come with rainbow farting unicorns? End justifies the means and the end did justified the means despite the missteps, all man dies but nations outlives us all.

China needed a steady hand to guide it well into the early 70s, as we face hostilities from both of the Great powers and needed strength to force at least one of them to reconsider their approach. If cultural revolution was any indication, is that none of the other leaders could met Mao’s caliber in political maneuvers. Hell, Deng’s survival and eventual rise were not even possible without his friendship with Mao.
 
Oh, I remembered, Chongqing was one of the area that had most fierce disorder in the CR. There were a lot of group graveyard built indeed.
Before you remind me I knew there were ships involved into massive riots(Aug,8,1967), but I have no idea with tanks.
It was a complete tragedy. IIRC they were different rioting groups, holding different opinions, but all of them followed "the highest command" from Mao himself, to create riots.

In chengdu, they had tanks. Mao had told the army to "arm the students" but he didn't say which students to arm. So different army units armed different groups and then they fought.

It was as of Jesus had come down and told a bunch of Christians that "some Christians are heretics and you need to fight them"
Now he did not say who the heretics were...
Religions can be dangerous because they allow people to subordinate their own morals to something that is "faultless" and outside of themselves.

Maoism functioned like that in the way that anything was OK as long as you were doing it for "Mao and the Revolution.".
 
Now I know why HOI is censored in China, because of this, arguing about politic, even you pack or against the government, they still don't like it, they think you guy are too smart and pay so much attention with politic, stop arguing the real-life problem. You guy should discuss the game mechanics, and what you in next DLC ... not the border, that thing, nobody will agree with each other, everyone wants some extra land. If you guy are so desperate about the "real" border, fine; Paradox, give what they want, just twist a little bit:
1/China can't go to war or take provinces of the countries that don't hold any of their "birth-right" provinces.
2/The moment they own all of their "birth-right" provinces, let them win (kick them out, they don't want anything else other than their "birth-right" border)
3/ For fanservice, just let them invade Japan, they love that, that their dying wish, ... wait, that will conflict with USA fanservice, ... well, first come first serve.
 
Since when are politicians ever good people? Since when does Greatness come with rainbow farting unicorns? End justifies the means and the end did justified the means despite the missteps, all man dies but nations outlives us all.

China needed a steady hand to guide it well into the early 70s, as we face hostilities from both of the Great powers and needed strength to force at least one of them to reconsider their approach. If cultural revolution was any indication, is that none of the other leaders could met Mao’s caliber in political maneuvers. Hell, Deng’s survival and eventual rise were not even possible without his friendship with Mao.

China wasn't guided well into the early 70's... It was guided disastrously.

China signed off on the invasion of South Korea and in the process lost their chance at taking Taiwan.

Good trade right there. Also, China made Korea safe for stalinism... Great job... As I type this on a Samsung from the Korea that everyone, including you, know is better.

China also starved and went through massive chaos and famine in a one party state with total control.

When that lazy Chiang wanted chaos and famine, he had to use the crutch of a foreign invasion and civil war.

Mao made sure that Chinese people could have it whenever Mao wanted.

My thesis is that China today is strong and prosperous DESPITE what Mao did in the 50s and 60s. That China survived is due to the capable people like Zhou Enlai.

As for Deng Xiaoping, he was only threatened because of Mao. (or was someone else going to have the standing to purge the former party secretary?) You're thanking the arsonist for putting out fires he started again. Mao didn't bring Deng up. He was a long marcher with a distinguished military career and party career. He would have done fine without him.

Also, Mao was so helpful to Deng that he decided to give him a little test. He liked Deng so much that he didn't name him as his successor. Rather Mao was nice enough to give Deng the present of a life or death struggle for supremacy with Hua gaofeng... So nice of Mao.
 
Now I know why HOI is censored in China, because of this, arguing about politic, even you pack or against the government, they still don't like it, they think you guy are too smart and pay so much attention with politic, stop arguing the real-life problem. You guy should discuss the game mechanics, and what you in next DLC ... not the border, that thing, nobody will agree with each other, everyone wants some extra land. If you guy are so desperate about the "real" border, fine; Paradox, give what they want, just twist a little bit:
1/China can't go to war or take provinces of the countries that don't hold any of their "birth-right" provinces.
2/The moment they own all of their "birth-right" provinces, let them win (kick them out, they don't want anything else other than their "birth-right" border)
3/ For fanservice, just let them invade Japan, they love that, that their dying wish, ... wait, that will conflict with USA fanservice, ... well, first come first serve.

Arguing Chinese history is so fun though...

I do think it's a problem that Chiang and the CCP can't unite China by force before the Japanese arrive. Alter the mechanics to show the cost of such a strategy but don't make it impossible.
 
China wasn't guided well into the early 70's... It was guided disastrously.
China signed off on the invasion of South Korea and in the process lost their chance at taking Taiwan.
Good trade right there. Also, China made Korea safe for stalinism... Great job... As I type this on a Samsung from the Korea that everyone, including you, know is better.
China also starved and went through massive chaos and famine in a one party state with total control.
When that lazy Chiang wanted chaos and famine, he had to use the crutch of a foreign invasion and civil war.
Mao made sure that Chinese people could have it whenever Mao wanted.
My thesis is that China today is strong and prosperous DESPITE what Mao did in the 50s and 60s. That China survived is due to the capable people like Zhou Enlai.
As for Deng Xiaoping, he was only threatened because of Mao. (or was someone else going to have the standing to purge the former party secretary?) You're thanking the arsonist for putting out fires he started again. Mao didn't bring Deng up. He was a long marcher with a distinguished military career and party career. He would have done fine without him.
Also, Mao was so helpful to Deng that he decided to give him a little test. He liked Deng so much that he didn't name him as his successor. Rather Mao was nice enough to give Deng the present of a life or death struggle for supremacy with Hua gaofeng... So nice of Mao.
Zhou’s visions could never be put to actions without the ground works that Mao layed out with sweat and blood. The famines and chaos were ultimately growing pains that China had to unfortunately endure for the price of rapid modernization that the west had the luxury to spreading out in decades if not centuries, as well as a hostile global environment that the great powers imposed upon us. And by the end of the day, the end did justified the means, and it was a collective effort of both Mao and Zhou’s vision that restored China to its rightful glory. Zhou is ultimately proven to be a guiding hand that lead China to prosperity, while Mao was the iron fist that paved way for her advancement towards prosperity, it is only fair to acknowledge the contribution and necessity of both.

By the end of the day, there is no use crying for what could have been, but be contend and thankful of what was given, especially since what was given is not bad to begin with. Such is but one of many wisdom of the Chinese people. Know content and be pragmatic, recognize greatness while acknowledging its price, for this nation is at heart a land where anyone can be dragons, not Washingtons.

And what sane person would want to be Washington if you can be a dragon.
 
In Taiwan, more people are in favor of Chiang Kai-Shek and less in favor of Mao than in China.

I doubt that, actually. Ever since the transition to democracy, there's been a huge backlash from the Taiwanese at Chiang's brutality towards them. He's practically reviled by most on the island now - if you talk to tour guides, they'll give you a detailed list of the human rights abuses that occurred under his martial law.

I feel that the anger is wholly justified - Chiang was arguably even more repressive in Taiwan than he ever was on the mainland. During the White Terror, military police dragged off teenagers and forced them to work in labor camps, and the kids were only let out in the 1980s.
 
Last edited:
Zhou’s visions could never be put to actions without the ground works that Mao layed out with sweat and blood. The famines and chaos were ultimately growing pains that China had to unfortunately endure for the price of rapid modernization that the west had the luxury to spreading out in decades if not centuries, as well as a hostile global environment that the great powers imposed upon us. And by the end of the day, the end did justified the means, and it was a collective effort of both Mao and Zhou’s vision that restored China to its rightful glory. Zhou is ultimately proven to be a guiding hand that lead China to prosperity, while Mao was the iron fist that paved way for her advancement towards prosperity, it is only fair to acknowledge the contribution and necessity of both.
The Great Leap Forward and the famines that followed it were absolutely not necessary growing pains- they were the result of bad policy. The Cultural Revolution was also not in any sense "necessary," it was another disastrous policy pursued by Mao Zedong. Those aspects of a Communist policy that did have positive long-term effects, like land reform, literacy and health campaigns, and improving the status of women, were not original to Mao and could have been implemented by any other party leader (and even the land reform was unnecessarily bloody in China- Japan, South Korea and Taiwan all accomplished it much more cleanly). Mao Zedong's real personal achievements are: seizing control of the party during the Yan'an years, and then seizing control of the country in 1949. He was a ruthless political climber and ordinary Chinese paid for his ambition with their lives, over and over.

By the end of the day, there is no use crying for what could have been, but be contend and thankful of what was given, especially since what was given is not bad to begin with. Such is but one of many wisdom of the Chinese people. Know content and be pragmatic, recognize greatness while acknowledging its price, for this nation is at heart a land where anyone can be dragons, not Washingtons.
塞翁失马 and all that. I do agree that it's easier to imagine a better outcome than to actually make one, but I think this attitude is too generous to Mao and the CCP. Whether anyone can be a dragon or not, well... guanxi can take people a long way.

And what sane person would want to be Washington if you can be a dragon.
Washington meaning, a man who held power for a time and then willingly gave it up to a legitimate successor? I'd say that China has suffered greatly for the lack of men like that.
 
By the end of the day, there is no use crying for what could have been, but be contend and thankful of what was given, especially since what was given is not bad to begin with. Such is but one of many wisdom of the Chinese people. Know content and be pragmatic, recognize greatness while acknowledging its price, for this nation is at heart a land where anyone can be dragons, not Washingtons..

Following that logic why not stick to the Japanese? They had already heavily invested in China and also envisioned a prosperous East Asia , cooperating in tandem to achieve econmic autarchy and to get rid of would be imperialists (and by Imperialist I mean WESTERN Imperialists) Sure, the cost of this would mean serfdom for China and other nations and many people killed. But greatness has its price, right?

Sometimes its not a matter of if you CAN pay the price. Its matter of if you SHOULD.
 
Off map factories
Harry Turtledove's World War in the Balance DLC confirmed:rolleyes:

Edit: will need off map resources as well ( hint, hint )
 
Last edited:
there will be more expansions, but we will see whether we will do another expansion pass. We have to process the lessons we learned first to make any future expansion pass not so...messy.

An easy way to do future passes is to give players the ability to 'pick' their free expansions.

Maybe: 2 small expansions of player's choice at any time, and the first major one, or the first two major ones, etc.
 
Oh, I remembered, Chongqing was one of the area that had most fierce disorder in the CR. There were a lot of group graveyard built indeed.
Before you remind me I knew there were ships involved into massive riots(Aug,8,1967), but I have no idea with tanks.
It was a complete tragedy. IIRC they were different rioting groups, holding different opinions, but all of them followed "the highest command" from Mao himself, to create riots.

At the highest point of the Revolution, there were new factions being created every day. And they all fought each other with both military equipment and improvised weapons. It was nearly impossible for Chinese society to even function, without being paralyzed several times a day.

I like to think of it as "Mao's petty attempt to punish the entire party and to see how giving China anarchy would go". Seriously, I'm sure the Cultural Revolution was where Mao officially lost his mind. No longer a charismatic, genuinely brilliant guerrilla leader. No longer a powerful, cunning autocrat with a vision for change. Instead, we have a chain-smoking, paranoid despot desiring to throw China into complete and utter insanity.

Also does anyone know when the expansion is to be released? or has it not yet been announced?

Not been announced yet. My best guesses are December 7th at earliest, before/during Chinese New Year at latest.
 
Last edited:
@ChairmanMeow:

Jokes:
  • Poor old Dr. Sun's reaction to both the White Terror and Mao's idiocy was to punch his coffin so hard that the walls of his tomb shook regularly. Plus the usual screams of rage and weeping.
  • He also spun in his grave so fast that it created huge winds which tore up fields. The CCP blamed that for the Great Leap Forward ("natural disaster", anyone?)
  • Oh, and when Dr. Sun finally met with CKS after he passed away, this happened:
  • Chiang: "Master, I have done my duty- (Sun hits him with his cane)
 
At the highest point of the Revolution, there were new factions being created every day. And they all fought each other with both military equipment and improvised weapons. It was nearly impossible for Chinese society to even function, without being paralyzed several times a day.

I like to think of it as "Mao's petty attempt to punish the entire party and to see how giving China anarchy would go". Seriously, I'm sure the Cultural Revolution was where Mao officially lost his mind. No longer a charismatic, genuinely brilliant guerrilla leader. No longer a powerful, cunning autocrat with a vision for change. Instead, we have a chain-smoking, paranoid despot desiring to throw China into complete and utter insanity.

Hardly, considering most of his accusations against Deng’s policy turned out to be true in the decades following his death, as under Deng capitalism did in fact return to China along with rising inequality, and the global communism movement did suffer due to Deng’s withdraw.

I think is not that he didn’t know what he was doing, but more that he prioritized the greater communist revolution over the economic building of the his nation, which ultimately proved to be a catastrophe for China and impractical for the wider world.