• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
"We can embrace the Build a Wall and make the Qu-Tarr Pay for it faction, giving us -20 relations with nasty aliens, and a yuge boost to engineering research."

So closed borders, monthly energy credit tribute, and an engineering boost? Sounds good to me!
 
I have a question; sense turning POPs into livestock/food-slaves is now a thing, is there also going to be an option to harvest primitives for food(or even hunt for sport Predator style?)?
 
Because collectivist and authoritarian are the same thing.

These are ethics we're talking about, not forms of government. Collectivism is the idea that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, authoritarianism is the idea that people need strong leadership. In human society, they usually go hand in hand because collectivism has to be enforced by authority, which results in government forms like regulated capitalism, socialism and ultimately communism. But for an alien race, collectivism might be so strongly rooted in their heritage and hardwired into their thinking that they don't even need an authority.

But as the dev diary mentioned, this is largely dependant on your interpretation of the terminology. I don't fully agree with the way they reworked this part of the ethics system, but making a system that fully 100% agrees with everyone's views on how governing ethos should work is impossible.
 
Last edited:
OH baby, hope this spawns an influx of memes to the thread.

75675865.jpg


But yeah, im looking forward to doing a 'Reaper' playthrough now, just indoctrinating species, uplifting them and making battle thralls and lots of servile fleets and then forcing ascension to reaper form upon them.
 
With the ability to eat pops we can finally play and show that endgame crisis how it's done.

Now if there only was a way to play nomadic... Tyranids FTW!
Nomads (with a choice to completely strip planets of resources), more bug portraits, and organic ships/weapons.
 
Can't resist pointing out that in the first event screen about societal shifts, it should be "and their society is all the richer for it," not "all the more richer for it." It's a double negative.

Edit: Sorry, it's redundant.
 
Last edited:
Can't resist point out that in the first event screen about societal shifts, it should be "and their society is all the richer for it," not "all the more richer for it." It's a double negative.

Maybe the person is jaded about their ethics and is being passive aggressive / sarcastic. *chuckle*
 
It looks like honeycomb.

So I guess it's related to the Hivemind mechanichs that will be presented in next week's diary...

Hivemind isn't an ethical point of view. It's something biological, so it can't be it.

If I had to guess, it represents three solar systems, with a bolded one. And that represents the "Regionalism" ethic, which if it takes hold, will get pops to demand autonomy or independence, regardless of the other ethics they have.
 
Which ethic is lost or added is determined by attraction, so if you are Spiritualist, Xenophobe and Authoritarian and make a shift towards Militarist, whichever of Spiritualist, Xenophobe and Authoritarian has the lowest attraction in your empire will be lost as a Governing Ethic.

This predictability is great! Way better than just having it be random :)
 
Knorr basically did this in stream. He had to conquer the planed, of course.
yes, but that's making the primitives part of your empire and then setting their species to livestock-slavery status, I'm talking about having an option from the observation station to abduct and eat them fresh from the wild.
 
Hivemind isn't an ethical point of view. It's something biological, so it can't be it.

If I had to guess, it represents three solar systems, with a bolded one. And that represents the "Regionalism" ethic, which if it takes hold, will get pops to demand autonomy or independence, regardless of the other ethics they have.
Being a hive mind is not in itself an ethic, but it replaces having an ethic. Instead of following an ethic, they follow the queen, in this case the player/government.
 
Being a hive mind is not in itself an ethic, but it replaces having an ethic. Instead of following an ethic, they follow the queen, in this case the player/government.

Still doesn't make sense, since what you're saying is basically Regionalism/Separatism.