• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #3 - 24th of May 2024 - France

Greetings, and welcome to the third Tinto Maps! Last week we received a great amount of feedback regarding Iberia, which we’re working on, and this week we also reworked the map of the Low Countries, which we’ll show soon.

For this week, we’ll be taking a look at France, up until its current modern borders (which you’ll notice are quite different from the 1337 borders):

Countries:
Countries.png

When portraying the political situation of France in 1337, we had a few options. On one extreme, we could make it a ‘centralized monarchy’, like England or the Iberian ones, but with a much lower degree of control over its territories. Conversely, we could have a ‘French Crown’ IO, similar to the HRE. We decided to go with the middle term, which represents the French Crown lands with the country of France, and its networks of appanages and vassals as different subjects. We think that this way we can portray the progressive centralization of the crown under the reigns of Philip II, Louis IX, and Philip IV, while also portraying the powerful jurisdictional powers of the French feuds. We have two types of subjects in France, by the way: vassals, which represent the regular fief mouvants, and appanages, which were the feuds granted to members of the royal family, that could eventually revert to the French Crown.

You may also notice that there might be a problem incoming related to a couple of English possessions in the mainland, the County of Ponthieu, and, especially, the Duchy of Aquitaine, as well as the Channel Islands of Jersey and Guernsey which comprise a dangerously close non-core location of England (they aren’t big enough to be a worthwhile subject country, even if that might be a more accurate representation).


Locations:
Locations.png

An interesting distribution of locations. Some names may be a bit long, so, please blame the French, not us, and ask if you want to know which location it is.

Provinces:
Provinces.png

We are aware that we have a severe inconsistency here, which is naming the provinces after locations instead of provincial and regional names (we were not very sure about what naming convention to use when we crafted this map). So we would be glad to receive feedback on the names that you think would fit. E.g.: Artois instead of Arras, Anjou instead of Angers, etc.

Terrain:
Climate.png

Topography.png

Vegetation.png

We’ll also read your feedback regarding the terrain of France, although we already know of some issues to correct (e.g.: changing the vegetation of the Landes to sparse instead of forests.

Cultures:
Cultures.png

Although there are two big cultural divisions of the French cultures, Langue d’Oil and Langue d’Oc, we think that their regional subdivisions would make the situation more accurate for 1337, where there is a long way until the cultural unification of France.

Religions:
Religion.png

Not a very interesting situation, only 0.80% of the population is of a different religion (Judaism). We haven’t portrayed any Catholic heresy yet, maybe Cathars should still have some room in the Languedoc, as Montaillou, an Occitan Village from 1294 to 1324, points to? Also, while taking this screenshot, we improved the view of this map mode, making it more responsive to zoom levels.

Raw Goods:
Raw Goods.png

The gold mines in the center of the map are going to die, as they were exploited only in recent times. Which other changes do you suggest?

Markets:
Markets.png

Paris already had replaced the fairs of Champagne as the main trading center of the region, driven by the growth of the crown lands and the royal power in the 13th century. Apart from that, we have the market at Bordeaux in Aquitaine.

Population:
Population.png

Pops with colors.png

Population, and also how it looks with colors when you have the country clicked (Paris, centralizing France since Hugh Capet…).

And that’s all for today! Next week we will move to the North-Eastern part of Europe, as we will take at look at Poland and the Baltic region. Cheers!
 
  • 208Love
  • 164Like
  • 5
  • 4
Reactions:
hey, might have been asked before but, does Papal Avignon have a control building in it from the start or is it REALLY low control, just curious

The Pope was actually in Avignon in 1337. So the question would rather be the opposite: what about Italy.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
The Pope was actually in Avignon in 1337. So the question would rather be the opposite: what about Italy.
The pope having basically no control over his Italian possessions is entirely accurate for 1337. It was not until Cardinal Albornoz' campaigns in 1350s and 1360s that papal rule was enforced
 
The Pope was actually in Avignon in 1337. So the question would rather be the opposite: what about Italy.
fr? Well that makes my devious scheming potentially more devious; I was asking because I was thinking about potential multiplayer shenanigans and how it might be fun to see if you could joining the 100 years on England sizes and pop out a French vassal... but... if the Pope is in Avignon the vassal part might be optional
 
Saint-Etienne was a small town at the time (the main town of the Forez being Montbrison), but there was coal extracted there since the 12th century. Ironmongering was also an important local industry, and it seems to already have been a thing in 1337 since nails from Saint-Etienne were used in the Palace of the Popes of Avignon. If there's no specific reason for the sand, it could have either iron or coal instead? It would of course become famous for weapons too, but that seems to have come later, after the hundred years war but before the italian wars.
First of all I am sorry that I add a message to such an old thread, but what I wanted to say also relates to Saint-Étienne and I had to thank Labstein for this very good analysis which seems to have been heard by the devs. Indeed in the Tinto Maps for Germany published on the 26th of July, we could see things had been changed for the better. I saw this post for the first time a few days ago (I'm only now catching up on Tinto Talks and Tinto Maps) and was firstly surprised that Saint-Étienne was its own location, and such a big one too, as in my mind, it really wasn't a major population center in 1337. I only noticed later that it originally wasn't included in the nation of Forez which I believe it has pretty much always been a part of. That has also been corrected since.

One of the best resources we have to get information about the Forez in my opinion is l'Armorial de Guillaume Revel (in French), a modern document based on the works of Guillaume Revel in the 15th century. It can be downloaded as a PDF from this page and includes a map on page 29 of the frontiers of the Forez and shows all the settlements Guillaume Revel covered in the 15th century. This time I want to thank the devs for following the actual borders so accurately, as can be seen in the Tinto Maps post for Germany (on the left is the map from l'Armorial, on the right from the post) :

Forez.png
Forez but in Project Caesar.png


We can see that the location of Saint-Étienne has been made smaller (since the Tinto Maps for France that you are reading this in) and the Forez went from 2 to 5 provinces which I am fully in favor of. The province Saint-Étienne is in has also been changed to be Lyonnais which makes complete sense although it could perhaps be cut in half. Nevertheless it's much better than being put with the Vivarais which we are separated from by bigger mountains than with Lyon. We can also see that Saint-Étienne is not talked about in l'Armorial, but that's probably because it didn't have a castle and was administered from the neighboring city of Saint-Priest (today, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, not Saint-Priest near Lyon) which also isn't in the document. Valbenoîte was an abbey which I think was located on the mandement of La Tour-en-Jarez, which is actually where I'm from. Today La Tour-en-Jarez is a village but historical sources such as the Petite Monographie de La Tour-en-Jarez of F. Chaux (very tough book to get your hands on but I own a copy) indicate it was a major commercial and judicial center, and it's kind of what I'm getting from what is written about it in l'Armorial. The same could probably be said for Saint-Priest. There were also other important cities in the area at the time such as Saint-Galmier (not on the map), Saint-Rambert, Saint-Chamond (sometimes Saint-Ennemond) but this last one seemingly was right where the border dispute with the archbishop of Lyon was, and it might have always stayed under the control of Lyon (I'm not too sure). It's all a little complicated because cities tend to depend on one another, sometimes they were basically bought by merchants and also they may appear more or less powerful depending on what you account for (military potential, population, judiciary power, importance of the church, size...).

Anyway all this to say that despite Saint-Étienne probably not being the biggest settlement in the area in 1337, it is absolutely the population center that grew the most over the centuries in the area (according to Wikipedia, which I know we shouldn't really use, the control of Saint-Priest didn't really hinder its growth, despite lasting until 1793) and was very relevant starting from the end of the 15th century I would say, as Labstein had mentionned. I think it makes sense to have it be the name of the location, and if it wasn't that, I wouldn't know what to name it. And if you have Saint-Étienne, you need to make the raw good coal (the intense exploitation of which came much later I think) or iron (which is what it has been changed to by the time of the Germany Tinto Maps). I am guessing the original sand good came from the fact that the vast majority of buildings in the historical center of Saint-Étienne, still today, are made out of sandstone because it is the stone that is found nearby, but I don't believe much sand was exported at all. Iron makes a lot more sense considering the very many ironworkers that the city used to host and the weapons industry that developed overtime. Perhaps there could be an event or something allowing the raw good to become coal at some point? But I'm unsure if the time period where it got more important than iron will be in project caesar.

I was going to propose making the terrain hills but that's actually what it's always been shown as, and I was a bit surprised by the choice of woods for the vegetation before I realised the Massif du Pilat is basically a huge forest.

So in the end I've written an enormous message to not actually suggest much (although perhaps some things I've said will lead to changes if the devs think they are necessary) and mostly praise the changes that have been done in the area between May and July, but now that I've spent hours writing all this I am not going to delete it. Sorry again for reviving this old post.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions: