• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #6 - 14th of June 2024 - Great Britain & Ireland

Hello everyone. @Pavía and the rest of the Content Design team are busy working on the feedback for the previous Tinto Maps, so I'm standing in for this week.

I'm @SaintDaveUK, some of you might have seen me here and there on the forums, but the long story short is that I work on a very secret game whose name I am contractually obligated to redact. That's right, it's ███████ ██████!

This week you get a double-whammy, mostly because it’s really hard to show Britain on its own on a screenshot. Partly to side-step the “British Isles” naming controversy, but mainly because the gameplay of them both is so different, this part of Europa is divided into 2 distinct regions: Great Britain and Ireland.

Climate​

The mild Oceanic climate (Köppen Cfb) dominates the isles. Where it cools towards the inland Pennines and the Scottish Highlands (Köppen Cfc), we represent it with the wintry and dreich Continental climate.

climate.jpg




Topography​

The isles are dominated by green and pleasant flatlands and low rolling hills, the peripheries punctuated by rocky mountains and craggy highlands.

We would like to add some more impassable locations in northern England and the Scottish borders to make manoeuvres a little more interesting and strategic, but would like suggestions from people more familiar with the Pennines.

[Edit: 16 June added the missing map]

topography.JPG


Vegetation​

The great moors, bogs, and fens are represented by Sparse vegetation, meanwhile much of the land is still wooded.

vegetation.jpg




Raw Materials​

The raw goods situation aims to reflect the economic reality of medieval Britain. Shepherding was common on every corner of the islands, a lot of the wool produced was sold to the industrial hub of the Low Countries to be manufactured into cloth, which was in turn sold back to British markets.

The further north-west we go, the less fertile the terrain, and as such the greater reliance on pastoral farming such as livestock over wheat. The western hills and valleys also expose a greater number of mineral delights, including the historic stannary mines of Devon and Cornwall.

raw_materials.jpg




Markets​

As you can see the two starting markets are London and Dublin. Aside from London we could have chosen almost any town, from Aberdeen to Bristol. We chose Dublin as it was the main trade centre in Ireland, and also because it handsomely splits the isles to the East and West of the Pennines, demonstrating the impact that terrain can have on dynamic Market attraction.

They are both shades of red because they are coloured after the market centre’s top overlord country – market control is a viable playstyle and we like to think of it as a form of map painting for countries not focused on traditional conquest routes.

market.jpg




Culture​

We have decided to go with a monolithic English culture. We could have forced the introduction of a second Northumbrian or even third Mercian culture, but typically they were not really considered separate peoples. The English, though diverse in origin and with a variety of dialects, had already begun to coalesce in the face of the Viking invasions hundreds of years before.

Scotland, conversely, is a real porridge of cultures. The Lowland Scots (who speak a dialect of Northumbrian English that later develops into the Scots language) dominate their kingdom from their wealthy burghs, and are gradually encroaching onto the pastoral lands of the Gaelic Highlanders. The Norse-Gaelic clansmen watch from the Western Isles, with some old settlements remaining around Galloway. The far north, ironically called Sutherland, retains some Norse presence.

Wales, conquered for around a century by this point, plays host to English burghers looking to make a few quid, as well as the descendants of Norman adventurer knights in the marcher lordships, but is still majority Welsh-speaking from Anglesey to Cardiff.

The Anglo-Irish (representing the spectrum from Cambro-Norman knights to the so-called ‘Old English’ settlers) live in great numbers in the south-eastern trading towns from Dublin to Cork, as well as in smaller numbers in frontier outposts.

The cosmopolitan towns across the isles are also home to people from elsewhere in Europe, most notably Flemish weavers from the Low Countries, though their numbers are too small to impact the mapmode.

The Norman ███████ dominates as the ██████████████ for both of the kingdoms and their subjects. The conquest of 1066 is no longer fresh, but the continuing bonds between the aristocratic classes of England, Scotland, and France have kept the French language alive and strong.

culture.jpg






Religion​

I decided that it's not even worth taking a screenshot of the Religion map mode. There are tiny minorities of Jewish people in some Scottish and Irish towns (they had been expelled from England), but they are so small in number they don't even register on the map mode

Other than that, it's all Catholic. But not for long.

> John Wycliffe has entered the chat.


Areas​

Based on the 4 provinces of Ireland (sorry Meath) and splitting England roughly into the larger Anglo-Saxon earldoms which have some similarity with the modern Regions (sorry Yorkshire).

areas.jpg





Provinces​

We have fixed the colours of the Provinces mapmode so you can see the individual provinces a bit more clearly. These are largely based on the historic counties, which have remained fairly constant throughout history, while merging some of those that are too small.

We’ve almost certainly offended someone.

The ancient Scottish shires are pretty messy and difficult to coalesce into neat provinces, so any suggestions for better arrangement there would be very welcome.

provinces.jpg




Locations​


You might notice that the locations in Ireland are varyingly written in both English and in Irish. This is because we have the new system up-and-running where we can name Locations by the primary culture of the country they are owned by.

This means that for example London might be called Londres if it was ruled by a Catalan country. It’s currently a WIP feature and we might add more elements, such as a game setting to base the name on dominant culture of the location instead, or to just use default (English) names.

locations.jpg




Government Types​

As with most of Europe, most of the countries are under some monarchy or another, but the Irish tuathas begin with the Tribe government type. This, among other mechanics such as [redacted] helps to give them a very unique playing style in Europe.

government.jpg


Countries​

England

England of course stands as the dominant kingdom in the isles. Despite having a lot of power resting on the barons, the country is fairly unitary even at this point, with very little practical separation between the crown’s power in somewhere like Kent versus Yorkshire. However there are notable exceptions.

The powerful Burgesses estate in the City of London enjoys ancient freedoms from royal power, while the king peers in from the Crown’s seat of power in neighbouring Westminster.

The County Palatine of Durham is not represented by a country, but buildings that give the Clergy Estate a huge amount of power in the locations it is present in. This also ties into political gameplay as a ██████████ ██████.

The newly created Duchy of Cornwall—the only duchy in England at the time—would also not be represented well by the Cornwall country, being a disparate set of manorial holdings that are ironically mostly in Devon. Cornwall of course exists as a releasable country though.

The Isle of Man is a little less certain. For now we have it as a subject of England. On paper it was a ‘kingdom’ awarded to William Montagu, the king’s favourite, however we aren’t sure if he actually wielded any real power on the isle. It changed hands between England and Scotland numerous times in this period, but in practice it appears to have been governed by a local council of barons. Any more details on exactly what was going on here in this period would be greatly appreciated.

These decisions have been made because as England heaves itself out of the feudal system, we thought it would be best if the small-fry inward-looking internal politicking is handled through the Estates and [redacted] systems, and then the diplomacy tracks are freed up for the English player to behave more outwardly against other major countries.

Wales

Though subjugated by conquest, Wales was not formally annexed into the Kingdom of England until the mid 1500s. As such the principality begins as a Dominion subject under England.

Those familiar with Welsh history will note that historically the Principality of Wales didn’t extend much beyond the old kingdom of Gywnedd. Much of the country to the southeast was in fact ruled by marcher lords, which we represent with a powerful Nobility estate in the valleys and beyond.

There is an alternative vision of Wales that I would like to gauge opinion on, and that is expanding it to include the Earldom of Chester and the marches on the English side of the modern border. If you are an Englishman familiar with modern borders this might look alarming, but these lands were also constitutionally ambiguous parts of the “Welsh Marches” until the 1500s. This will hand over to the Wales player the full responsibility of dealing with the marcher lords, allowing England to focus on bigger picture issues like beating France.

Ireland

Ireland is going through a moment of change. English royal power is centred on the Lordship of the Pale, the king’s Dominion ruling out of Dublin Castle. However, it struggles to keep a grasp on the rebellious Hiberno-Norman earls scattered around the island - some of whom remain as vassals, some of whom have managed to slip free of royal control.

The Tanistry system of succession endemic to the Gaelic Irish has its advantages, but it can also lead to chaotic feuds between rival branches. The so-called Burke Civil War has fractured the powerful Earldom of Ulster into rival Burke cousins who jealously feud over their shrinking lordships in Connaught. Native Irish princes of the north have reconquered most of their own lands from the de Burghs, but there are also two rival O’Neill cousins who style themselves King of Tyrone either side of the River Bann.

The feuding Irish lack a unifying figure, but anyone powerful enough could theoretically claim the title of High King. The former provincial kingdoms, such as Meath and Connacht, enjoy the elevated rank of Duchy, giving them a slight edge in the High Kingship selection.

Scotland

The chancer Edward Balliol continues his attempt for the Scottish throne, with England’s tacit permission. It’s hard to determine the exact lands held by Balliol in 1337, but we know his disinherited loyalists hold the castle of Perth while his English allies had seized large tracts of the lowlands from Bruce. Balliol has also bought the loyalty of the MacDonald and the other Hebridean galley lords by granting them remote land on the west coast of the mainland.

Meanwhile, Scotland’s canny regent Sir Andrew de Moray launches his decisive counterattack as his true king, David II de Bruce, waits in exile in France.

political.jpg


Dynasties​

We know about Plantagenet, Balliol, and Bruce, so I've zoomed in on Ireland to show the ruling dynasties of the various chieftains and earls.

dynasty.jpg


Population​

Excuse the seams and the greyscale mapmode. We have something better in the pipeline...

population_country.jpg
population_location.jpg




Well, thats it for now!

As always the team is eagerly awaiting your feedback and looking forward to the discussions. We’ll try to keep on top of the thread, but we have a teambuilding activity this afternoon so it might be a little more sporadic than usual!

Next week: Anatolia!
 
Last edited:
  • 221Like
  • 100Love
  • 7
  • 7
  • 1
Reactions:
It definitely isn't, but some of the changes on Britain itself can be seen in new vassals that definitely weren't there before or with different borders.
1746036516348.png
1746036630921.png
1746036666034.png


The Original being the Far left and the most accurate image we have is the Far right from day 1 anyway. Look like Connacht formed for sure. Defintely more locations have been added as we can see with the polictical divisions.
 

Attachments

  • 1746036458432.png
    1746036458432.png
    774,2 KB · Views: 0
  • 2Like
  • 2
Reactions:
Alright, to continue my thoughts on representing the most powerful English magnates as BBC vassals, I wanted to lay out the research I've pulled together to show the possibilities.

English Peers

TitleFamilyNotes
Duke of CornwallPlantagenetGranted to Edward the Black Prince - most of the estate is in Devon, including the Forest of Dartmoor
Earl of ChesterPlantagenetGranted to Edward the Black Prince, expanded to include marches in Wales
Earl of ArundelFitzAlanHeir to the Earl of Surrey (his childless uncle), also holding marches in Wales
Earl of DerbyLancaster-PlantagenetHeir to the Earl of Lancaster and Leicester
Earl of DevonCourtenay
Earl of EssexBohunAlso Earl of Hereford and holding marches in Wales
Earl of GloucesterAudley
Earl of HerefordBohunAlso Earl of Essex and holding marches in Wales
Earl of HuntingdonClinton
Earl of KentKent-PlantagenetFirst cousin of Edward III, 7 years old in 1337
Earl of LancasterLancaster-PlantagenetGrandson of Henry III, also Earl of Leicester and holding marches in Wales
Earl of LeicesterLancaster-PlantagenetGrandson of Henry III, also Earl of Lancaster and holding marches in Wales
Countess of LincolnLacyCountess Alice de Lacy is 55 without any children, upon her death her title lapsed back to the King and her lands went to Henry of Grosmont (Earl of Derby in 1337)
Earl of NorfolkBrotherton-PlantagenetUncle of Edward III, heir is a daughter. He died in 1338.
Earl of NorthhamptonBohunYounger brother to the Earl of Hereford and Essex
Earl of OxfordVere
Earl of RichmondDreuxAlso Duke of Brittany
Earl of SalisburyMontaguAlso holding marches in Wales
Earl of SuffolkUfford
Earl of SurreyWarenneChildless, his heir is his nephew the Earl of Arundel
Earl of WarwickBeauchampAlso holding marches in Wales
I haven't done the research to determine where most of these peers actually had holdings, but you can see that multiple earls are also Marcher Lords, double earls, or, in the case of the Earl of Richmond, also the Duke of Brittany as well.

This doesn't include any of the barons who were also peers, but there are three baronial families who played an outsized role in the next hundred years of English history and all gained earldoms of their own in the near future - the House of Mowbray (Earl of Nottingham in 1377), the House of Percy (Earl of Northumberland in 1377) and the House of Neville (Earl of Westmorland in 1397). I would place Mowbray in Norfolk and Suffolk, Percy in Northumberland and North Yorkshire, and Neville in Durham and North Yorkshire.

Welsh Marcher Lords
I'm mostly drawing from @WelshStalker's excellent posts on Wales for these lords, which definitely make sense as actual location based vassals, not building based. There are a couple discrepencies in what WelshStalker had and what I saw in my research, so I'll note those as well.
TitleFamilyNotes
Earl of MarchMortimerThe most extensive Marcher Lordship by far, WelshStalker has given the lands to them, but in 1337 the Mortimer lands and the title of Earl of March are attainted.
Earl of PembrokeHastingsThis title is not actually granted until 1339, technically
Lord of PowysCharltonThe Lord of Powys is English, but his wife is the Welsh granddaughter of the last King of Powys Wenwynwyn
Lord of GlamorganDespenser
Lord of Gwynllwg/NewportStafford
Lord of RuthinGrey
Lord of CamaesAudleyAlso Lord of Cantref Bychan, not the Earl of Gloucester
Lord of Cantref BychanAudleyAlso lord of Camaes, not the Earl of Gloucester
Lord of DenbighMontaguDisputed by Mortimer, but held by the Earl of Salisbury (WelshStalker had this as Mortimer, I would give a claim, as Mortimer did not regain this until a lawsuit in 1354)
Lord of ChirkFitzAlanAlso Lord of Owestry and Earl of Arundel
Lord of OwestryFitzAlanAlso Lord of Chirk and Earl of Arundel
Lord of GowerBeauchampAlso Earl of Warwick (this is a weird one, the Lord of Gower in the 1320s granted the Lordship to his son-in-law John Mowbray, but also sold the estate several times to the Bohuns, Despensers, and Mortimers. All I could find is that the Beauchamps eventually got it by the 1350s and I gave up at that point.
Lord of BreconBohunAlso Earl of Hereford and Essex
Lord of the Three CastlesLancaster-PlantagenetAlso Earl of Lancaster and Leicester (Welshstalker has this given to the Earl of Chester)
Lord of KidwellyLancaster-PlantagenetAlso Earl of Lancaster and Leicester (WelshStalker has this given to the Earl of Chester)
On the Mortimers: Roger Mortimer, first Earl of March succussfully overthrew Edward II in 1326 and ruled as Edward III's regent until 1330, when he was hanged and his lands and titles made forfeit. His son died a year later, leaving his grandson Roger to reclaim the lands and titles - Roger is 9 in 1337, and would only reacquire his lands piecemeal over time - they were returned to him as he grew up and served Edward III loyally. Some of his lands were restored to him starting in 1341, but he wouldn't get the title of Earl of March back until 1355. This might be an interesting case for a series of events, but I could also see the argument for just letting Mortimer/March have their lands in 1337, especially since Roger is only 9.

Similar to the baronial familes of England, there are a couple of families in Wales which might be interesting to represent - the Tudors, ancestors of the future Henry VII, are a baronial-equivalent family in Anglesey while further east Gruffudd Fychan II has a claim to the Kingdom of Powys Fadog and his son is Owain Glyndwr, who will launch the last real attempt by the Welsh to throw off the English in 1400.


I've already written extensively on Scottish vassals, so I'll mostly leave that aside. However, I did choose to omit several of the smaller lowland Scottish vassals as I didn't think they really qualified to be location based, but I think they would still make for interesting BBCs.

Scottish LBC Vassals:

Highland vassals: Isles, Uist, Strathnaver, Caithness, Sutherland, Ross, Moray
Border vassals: Dunbar, Douglas
Other: Stewart was both heir to the almost-certainly infertile David II and a powerful landholding in Ayr and Argyll with ambitions to expand his holdings in central Scotland.

Scottish BBC Vassals:
The lowland earls of Scotland had less independence than their highland neighbors, but they still had ancient powers and rights enough to assert themselves as necessary.
I would place the lowland Earldoms of Menteith, Lennox, Fife, Angus, and Mar as BBC vassals. Two other historical earldoms are Atholl and Strathearn, which would be claimed by Robert Stewart over the next few decades but were essentially returned to the crown in 1337. There's also the argument for Garioch under Christina Bruce as a BBC, although she was childless and in her fifties in 1337 and her lands would be given to the Earl of Mar on her death.

I'm still not 100% convinced this makes sense as a proposal, but I couldn't get it out of my head so I ended up diving into it. Like I said before, I think having an Earldom building for the main seat of the Earl and a Barony building for their more minor holdings which increases the power of the nobility estate and maybe steals a certain amount of taxes from gathered from the location, as well as providing soldiers, would be one way of representing this, although just using whatever exists for the Japanese Daimyos may also work.
 
  • 5
  • 2Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Alright, to continue my thoughts on representing the most powerful English magnates as BBC vassals, I wanted to lay out the research I've pulled together to show the possibilities.

English Peers

TitleFamilyNotes
Duke of CornwallPlantagenetGranted to Edward the Black Prince - most of the estate is in Devon, including the Forest of Dartmoor
Earl of ChesterPlantagenetGranted to Edward the Black Prince, expanded to include marches in Wales
Earl of ArundelFitzAlanHeir to the Earl of Surrey (his childless uncle), also holding marches in Wales
Earl of DerbyLancaster-PlantagenetHeir to the Earl of Lancaster and Leicester
Earl of DevonCourtenay
Earl of EssexBohunAlso Earl of Hereford and holding marches in Wales
Earl of GloucesterAudley
Earl of HerefordBohunAlso Earl of Essex and holding marches in Wales
Earl of HuntingdonClinton
Earl of KentKent-PlantagenetFirst cousin of Edward III, 7 years old in 1337
Earl of LancasterLancaster-PlantagenetGrandson of Henry III, also Earl of Leicester and holding marches in Wales
Earl of LeicesterLancaster-PlantagenetGrandson of Henry III, also Earl of Lancaster and holding marches in Wales
Countess of LincolnLacyCountess Alice de Lacy is 55 without any children, upon her death her title lapsed back to the King and her lands went to Henry of Grosmont (Earl of Derby in 1337)
Earl of NorfolkBrotherton-PlantagenetUncle of Edward III, heir is a daughter. He died in 1338.
Earl of NorthhamptonBohunYounger brother to the Earl of Hereford and Essex
Earl of OxfordVere
Earl of RichmondDreuxAlso Duke of Brittany
Earl of SalisburyMontaguAlso holding marches in Wales
Earl of SuffolkUfford
Earl of SurreyWarenneChildless, his heir is his nephew the Earl of Arundel
Earl of WarwickBeauchampAlso holding marches in Wales
I haven't done the research to determine where most of these peers actually had holdings, but you can see that multiple earls are also Marcher Lords, double earls, or, in the case of the Earl of Richmond, also the Duke of Brittany as well.

This doesn't include any of the barons who were also peers, but there are three baronial families who played an outsized role in the next hundred years of English history and all gained earldoms of their own in the near future - the House of Mowbray (Earl of Nottingham in 1377), the House of Percy (Earl of Northumberland in 1377) and the House of Neville (Earl of Westmorland in 1397). I would place Mowbray in Norfolk and Suffolk, Percy in Northumberland and North Yorkshire, and Neville in Durham and North Yorkshire.

Welsh Marcher Lords
I'm mostly drawing from @WelshStalker's excellent posts on Wales for these lords, which definitely make sense as actual location based vassals, not building based. There are a couple discrepencies in what WelshStalker had and what I saw in my research, so I'll note those as well.
TitleFamilyNotes
Earl of MarchMortimerThe most extensive Marcher Lordship by far, WelshStalker has given the lands to them, but in 1337 the Mortimer lands and the title of Earl of March are attainted.
Earl of PembrokeHastingsThis title is not actually granted until 1339, technically
Lord of PowysCharltonThe Lord of Powys is English, but his wife is the Welsh granddaughter of the last King of Powys Wenwynwyn
Lord of GlamorganDespenser
Lord of Gwynllwg/NewportStafford
Lord of RuthinGrey
Lord of CamaesAudleyAlso Lord of Cantref Bychan, not the Earl of Gloucester
Lord of Cantref BychanAudleyAlso lord of Camaes, not the Earl of Gloucester
Lord of DenbighMontaguDisputed by Mortimer, but held by the Earl of Salisbury (WelshStalker had this as Mortimer, I would give a claim, as Mortimer did not regain this until a lawsuit in 1354)
Lord of ChirkFitzAlanAlso Lord of Owestry and Earl of Arundel
Lord of OwestryFitzAlanAlso Lord of Chirk and Earl of Arundel
Lord of GowerBeauchampAlso Earl of Warwick (this is a weird one, the Lord of Gower in the 1320s granted the Lordship to his son-in-law John Mowbray, but also sold the estate several times to the Bohuns, Despensers, and Mortimers. All I could find is that the Beauchamps eventually got it by the 1350s and I gave up at that point.
Lord of BreconBohunAlso Earl of Hereford and Essex
Lord of the Three CastlesLancaster-PlantagenetAlso Earl of Lancaster and Leicester (Welshstalker has this given to the Earl of Chester)
Lord of KidwellyLancaster-PlantagenetAlso Earl of Lancaster and Leicester (WelshStalker has this given to the Earl of Chester)
On the Mortimers: Roger Mortimer, first Earl of March succussfully overthrew Edward II in 1326 and ruled as Edward III's regent until 1330, when he was hanged and his lands and titles made forfeit. His son died a year later, leaving his grandson Roger to reclaim the lands and titles - Roger is 9 in 1337, and would only reacquire his lands piecemeal over time - they were returned to him as he grew up and served Edward III loyally. Some of his lands were restored to him starting in 1341, but he wouldn't get the title of Earl of March back until 1355. This might be an interesting case for a series of events, but I could also see the argument for just letting Mortimer/March have their lands in 1337, especially since Roger is only 9.

Similar to the baronial familes of England, there are a couple of families in Wales which might be interesting to represent - the Tudors, ancestors of the future Henry VII, are a baronial-equivalent family in Anglesey while further east Gruffudd Fychan II has a claim to the Kingdom of Powys Fadog and his son is Owain Glyndwr, who will launch the last real attempt by the Welsh to throw off the English in 1400.


I've already written extensively on Scottish vassals, so I'll mostly leave that aside. However, I did choose to omit several of the smaller lowland Scottish vassals as I didn't think they really qualified to be location based, but I think they would still make for interesting BBCs.

Scottish LBC Vassals:

Highland vassals: Isles, Uist, Strathnaver, Caithness, Sutherland, Ross, Moray
Border vassals: Dunbar, Douglas
Other: Stewart was both heir to the almost-certainly infertile David II and a powerful landholding in Ayr and Argyll with ambitions to expand his holdings in central Scotland.

Scottish BBC Vassals:
The lowland earls of Scotland had less independence than their highland neighbors, but they still had ancient powers and rights enough to assert themselves as necessary.
I would place the lowland Earldoms of Menteith, Lennox, Fife, Angus, and Mar as BBC vassals. Two other historical earldoms are Atholl and Strathearn, which would be claimed by Robert Stewart over the next few decades but were essentially returned to the crown in 1337. There's also the argument for Garioch under Christina Bruce as a BBC, although she was childless and in her fifties in 1337 and her lands would be given to the Earl of Mar on her death.

I'm still not 100% convinced this makes sense as a proposal, but I couldn't get it out of my head so I ended up diving into it. Like I said before, I think having an Earldom building for the main seat of the Earl and a Barony building for their more minor holdings which increases the power of the nobility estate and maybe steals a certain amount of taxes from gathered from the location, as well as providing soldiers, would be one way of representing this, although just using whatever exists for the Japanese Daimyos may also work.
I really like the idea of making noble families BBCs, but in order for the game to be consistent this would have to be applied to many countries. Unfortunately, there's a good chance the devs will refuse to do that, so this might have to be relegated to a mod or a future DLC. For that purpose itself, I highly value proposals such as this.
 
  • 8
Reactions:
I really like the idea of making noble families BBCs, but in order for the game to be consistent this would have to be applied to many countries. Unfortunately, there's a good chance the devs will refuse to do that, so this might have to be relegated to a mod or a future DLC. For that purpose itself, I highly value proposals such as this.
I also think there's a lot of potential for modding with this. It might never make it to the game proper, but maybe I'll build out a mod for it and it's good to have it all laid out.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
It also looks like there might be some more marcher lords in Wales which chester has expanded into
Given the amount of time that would have passed since game start, it could also have been Owain Glyndŵr’s rebellion giving more land to Wales and subsequently being conquered by Chester.
 
Last edited:
Another stab at this, taking into account feedback from other people. I'm not necessarily suggesting splitting all locations to this. The biggest change I made was drawing the coastlines better, which let me locate everything better than I was able to earlier.

View attachment 1187942

I redrew the 'Argyll', 'Ross', 'Caithness' and 'Fife' provinces to hopefully get them closer into shape, though with preference to the later county maps rather than trying reason out the earlier provincial lordships. There had to be some fudging to get some a clickable size, and I'm now convinced there's no good way to do Fife. Given Paradox want to name locations after cities or castles instead of regions, I've named the non-island locations as such too.

Notes on population numbers:
* - star indicates my estimates.
c. 1290: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...4-great-britain-ireland.1687953/post-29699100
1755, 1801, 1811, 1821, 1831, 1841: https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files...us-of-1755-scottish-population-statistics.pdf

Locations:

Aberdeen:
The city held a privileged position during the middle ages, and was the seat of a bishop. It was strongly fortified until 1770, with a castle built by 1264, improved naval defenses built in 1446, and a fort built in 1651. It was one the three major Scottish fish export centres, and also owned the nearby Stocket forest. The city had been burned down by the English in 1336, struck by the plague in 1350 where half the population died, struck by a disease believed typhoid in 1401 and 1536, reached 8-10k people by 1600, the Royalists sacked the city in 1644 under Montrose, the Covenanters sacked it soon after, and was hit by another plague outbreak in 1647 which killed a quarter of the population. It was captured by Earl Marischal in September 1715 for the Jacobite wars and was held until the Old Pretender left on 30th January 1716. The Infirmary hospital was built in 1742. It was not heavily damaged when captured by the Duke of Cumberland in 1746. It became a major linen manufacturing centre in the 18th Century but this only lasted a century. The city was almost bankrupt by 1817, largely from infrastructure projects like improved port facilities.
Population: 16154 (c. 1290*), 29596 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Annan:
This is a location I believe should be added for two reasons: 1) Dumfriesshire is drawn smaller than it was and when drawn with correct borders becomes overly large, and 2) it was an important place in its own right. Annandale was the original centre of power for the Bruce family. It went to the Dunbars in 1371 after the death of the king through his aunt Agnes, then to the Douglas by conquest in 1401 after the Dunbars joined the English banner. It passed to the crown in 1440 after the murder of the 16 year old earl William. Annan was on the borders, and so for most of its history was a largely lawless region and suffered predations by reavers, English raids, and fighting between local magnates. Annandale really only turned around after the union of the English and Scottish crowns, and the construction of a cotton mill in 1785. Despite this the region held a relatively high population for the entire period.
Population: 17560 (c. 1290*), 17852 (1755)
Trade good: Fibre crops.

Applecross:
In Wester Ross, I think this location makes more sense than any other you could have. Wester Ross has always had a low population, though the south was more populated than the north. The inheritance of Applecross by Ross is how Wester Ross passed to the Rosses in the first place. This region was mostly Gaelic speaking and held a relatively low population throughout the entire period. The MacKenzie clan supported the Jacobite rebellion in 1715, but not the second in 1746.
Population: 2208 (c. 1290*), 3426 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Arbroath:
Largely under the control of the local abbey. Significantly damaged by fighting over the role of Chief Justiciary in 1446. The town emphatically backed the Jacobites in both rebellions, and it was an important supply port for both rebellions.
Population: 4038 (c. 1290*), 4786 (1755)
Trade good: Fibre crops I think would be a better trade good than Sturdy Grains, as it was an important port and it had jute and sail cloth industries during the time period.

Ardtornish:
Possesion of the lords of the Isles from between 1314 and 1320. Should the Balliol win the Scottish crown, this should be passed to Eóghan MacDougall, Lord of Argyll and Lorne.
Population: 3750 (c. 1290*), 6093 of which 2068 Catholic (1755*)
Trade good: Either sturdy grains or livestock. The soil quality wasn't great and food production only really picked up after potatoes were introduced in the 18th Century.

Ayr:
Ayr was the main port and market in Ayrshire from the 13th Century. It was the centre of the Kyle province, which was historically divided in two: the northern half was held by the Stewarts and the southern half by the kings. The town's population itself was between 1500-2000 people until the mid 18th Century. It suffered numerous outbreaks of plague: in 1545, 1585, 1587, 1597, 1601, 1606 and 1647.
Population: 15279 (c. 1290*), 20054 (1755)
Trade good: Wool, though either fish or livestock would also work. Coal was discovered in the 17th Century nearby.

Banff:
Banff resisted the reformation initially, with the 6th earl of Huntly defeating 10000 protestants under the 7th earl of Argyll at Glenlivet in 1594, though they were unable to follow up the victory. 1624-1645 was characterised with a lot of fighting against the clans in the area. It was staunchly Jacobite, and was a centre of the 1715 rebellion, though the 1745 rebellion wasn't much cared for here. Catholicism held out in several parts of the county.
Population: 14238 (c. 1290), 38478 (1755), 37216 (1801). 38433 (1811), 43663 (1821), 48337 (1831), 49679 (1841)
Trade good: Fish, though stone also makes sense. Wool and wheat/sturdy grains also makes sense.

Blairgowrie:
The province of Gowrie had excellent soil, and grew a lot of fruit from the middle ages onwards.
Population: 11170 (c. 1290*), 15415 (1755)
Trade good: Wheat, textiles became important in the 17th Century.

Brora:
The eastern half of Sutherland. Lots of names possible for this location, I went with Brora though someone else suggested Helmsdale.
Population: 1115 (c. 1290*), 4032 (1755)
Trade good: Fish or stone. Coal was discovered in 1529.

Bute:
Bute was a possession of the Stewarts, and Rothesay was the original centre of power for the family.
Population: 4385 (c. 1290*), 7125 (1755), 11791 (1801), 12033 (1811), 13797 (1821), 14151 (1831), 15740 (1841)
Trade good: Fish.

Comrie:
In Strathearn. Strathearn was in the possession of Malise V, Earl of Orkney. Balliol had forfeited Strathearn to give to John de Warenne, earl of Surrey but this was not effected as Strathearn remained under Scottish control. Comrie was struck badly by the plague in 1645, and by smallpox in the 1790s. Comrie remained Gaelic long after much of the surrounding region stopped. The region sympathised strongly with both Jacobite rebellions.
Population: 17593 (c. 1290*), 24278 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock or wool.

Cromarty:
Cromarty has been drawn to contain the Black Isle. It had an excellent harbour in the Cromarty Firth, and was on the pilgrimage route to Tain. George Ross, the earl of Cromarty was wealthy enough in the the late 18th Century to rebuild the entire town including a factory, brewery, harbour, courthose, church, and manor. The Black Isle was one of the first places in the highlands to be cleared.
Population: 2219 (c. 1290*), 10298 (1755)
Trade good: Fibre crops. Fish as an alternative.

Cupar:
Cupar was the main seat of the earls of Fife. It begins in 1337 occupied by the English/Balliol.
Population: 12939 (c. 1290*), 21368 (1755)
Trade good: Wheat.

Dingwall:
Dingwall was the seat of the earls of Ross. In 1411 Angus of the Isles failed to capture the town, but acquired all of Ross in 1438. This was confiscated by the king in 1475 after the discovery of the secret treaty with England. Dingwall castle was abandoned circa 1600 and the town fell into decline, being described as ruins and almost desolate in 1724.
Population: 3119 (c. 1290*), 9676 (1755)
Trade good: Game.

Dornoch:
Centre of the Sutherland's power, and seat of the diocese of Caithness.
Population: 1572 (c. 1290*), 9046 (1755)
Trade good: Game will do.

Dumbarton:
Dumbarton was a highly defensible town, and begins in 1337 as where Stewart is governing the Bruce's territory of Scotland in his absence (the king was in France in 1337). It was the centre of power of the Lennox family. The castle was repeatedly upgraded during the entire game timespan. Dumbarton was the centre of the kingdom of Alclud, and later belonged to the kingdom of Strathclyde. Flood protections were built for the town in 1605.
Population: 13857 (1755), 20710 (1801), 24189 (1811), 27317 (1821), 33221 (1831), 44296 (1841)
Trade good: Fish.

Dumfries:
Dumfries is drawn as the province of Nithsdale. It was an important market town and port. The Young Pretender set up his headquarters here in 1745. It was struck by a cholera outbreak in 1832.
Population: 27134 (c.1290*), 21936 (1755)
Trade good: Wool

Dunbar:
An important town and castle held by the Earls of Dunbar. At game start in 1337 it is still under control of the Earl of Dunbar and would, led by Agnes as the earl was leading an army elsewhere, repel a siege by the earl of Salisbury in 1338. the lands of the earls of Dunbar were forfeited in 1457.
Population: 10932 (c. 1290*), 29709 (1755), 29986 (1801), 31050 (1811), 35127 (1821), 36145 (1831), 35886 (1841)
Trade good: Wheat.

Dunblane:
In Menteith; site of an eponymous diocese. Menteith was under the control of the Swewarts of Menteith.
Population: 13660 (c. 1290*), 18851 (1755)
Trade good: Wheat.

Dundee:
Major port in Angus, under direct royal control.
Population: 18776 (c. 1290*), 22253 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Dundonnell:
The best name I can find of the province of Lochbroom (currently given the anachronistic name of Ullapool), in northwestern Ross.
Population: 1190 (c. 1290*), 2211 (1755)
Trade good: Salt.

Dunfermline:
De facto capital of Scotland until 1437, and site of an important Scottish abbey.
Population: 16855 (c. 1290*), 27835 (1755)
Trade good: Fibre crops.

Dunkeld:
The best name I can think to give to the province of Atholl (Aberfeldy is kinda anachronistic since that's really only known because of Burns). An alternative is Blair Atholl, centre of the Earls of Atholl. Site of a diocese. Should Balliol win the Scottish throne, this should be given to David IV Strathbogie as vassal territory.
Population: 16646 (c. 1290*), 22972 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Dunollie:
Best name I can think of for the province of Lorne. Also contained Lismore, the seat of a diocese. 'Oban' is anachronistic. At game start, Ruaidhri mac Ailein of the MacRorys (in Mull) had been dispossessed but it is thought that he had his rights restored by Edward Balliol (though as Balliol's control never extended this far west, it never actually occurred). David II confirmed this in 1344 but only gave them back Garmoran and the North Isles. After his death in 1346, these lands were inherited by his sister Amy who married the Lord of the Isles, further extending them into Scotland. So in case of Balliol winning the Scottish throne, 'Lorne' should appear as a vassal here, Garmoran and Mull.
Population: 5196 (c. 1290*), 8442 (1755)
Trade good: Clay. The islands off the coast are known as the Slate Islands, and was the centre of Scottish slate production, so trade good of Stone also makes sense.

Dunoon:
Main town and castle on the Cowal peninsula. It was under royal control.
Population: 4922 (c. 1290), 7998 (1755)
Trade good: Clay.

Duns:
For March (Berwickshire), which is awkwardly misplaced as part of the location of Berwick. Duns was part of the property of the earls of Dunbar, though unlike Dunbar begins in 1337 under English occupation. The earl of Northumberland was defeated here in 1377 when the army's horses were scared by the rattles the farmers used to scare birds away from the crops.
Population: 30368 (c. 1290), 23987 (1755), 30206 (1801), 30893 (1811), 33385 (1821), 34048 (1831), 34438 (1841)
Trade good: Wheat.

Durness:
Western Strathnaver, and should begin in 1337 as belonging to that vassal. It was sold to Sutherland in the 18th Century due to debts.
Population: 1042 (c. 1290*), 3803 (1755)
Trade good: Clay.

Edinburgh:
Population: 33269 (c.1290*), 90412 (1755), 122597 (1801), 148607 (1811), 191514 (1821), 219345 (1831), 225454 (1841)
Trade good: Sturdy grains.

Elgin:
Centre of the province of Moray, and site of the cathedral of the diocese of Moray. In 1337 it was the capital of the vassal of Moray; should Balliol win the throne this vassal should be abolished (he was King David's uncle and certainly would never be allowed to retain his lands).
Population: 30604 (1755), 27760 (1801), 27697 (1811), 31398 (1821), 34498 (1831), 35012 (1841)
Trade good: Sturdy grains.

Forfar:
Should Balliol win the Scottish throne, Angus should be created a vassal here under Gilbert of Umfraville.
Population: 15760 (c. 1290*), 18678 (1755)
Trade good: Wool.

Gairloch:
The central parish of Wester Ross; and should start the game in 1337 as belonging to a vassal Ross.
Population: 1381 (c. 1290*), 2050 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Garioch:
I combined this with Strathbogie to make smaller the locations in Aberdeenshire; this may not be desirable. Garioch was largely attached to the county of Mar from before this date, and starts under Christina Bruce or as straight up Scottish royal territory.
Population: 11715 (c. 1290*), 21464 (1755)
Trade good: Wool.

Glasgow:
Population: 30528 (c. 1290*), 58846 (1755)
Trade good: Horses, livestock or wool.

Harris:
Population: 1019 (c. 1290*), 1969 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Hawick:
Western Roxburghshire. Emerged in importance after Roxburgh was abandoned.
Population: 6758 (c.1290*), 6871 (1755)
Trade good: Wool.

Inverary:
Main city in Argyll.
Population: 5201 (c. 1290*), 8451 (1755)
Trade good: Salt.

Inverlochy:
Best name I can think of for the name of the province of Lochaber. Should begin in 1337 belonging to the Isles.
Population: 1891 (c. 1290*), 3073 (1755)
Trade good: Alum.

Inverness:
Population: 3421 (c. 1290*), 20624 of which 486 Catholic (1755)
Trade good: Sturdy grains.

Irvine:
Capital of the province of Cunninghame in northern Ayrshire. Experienced plague in 1546. The port at Irvine was very important but declined in the 18th Century due to silting.
Population: 21442 (c. 1290*), 28143 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Islay:
Population: 3964 (c. 1290*), 6441 (1755)
Trade good: Fibre crops or fish.

Jedburgh:
In eastern Roxburghshire.
Population: 27377 (c. 1290*), 27833 (1755)
Trade good: Wheat.

Kenmore:
In Breadalbane, which was separated from Atholl in 1449, and fully separated in 1681.
Population: 3649 (c. 1290*), 5035 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Kenmure:
A potential split of Kirkcudbrightshire.
Population: 5118 (c. 1290*), 4138 (1755)
Trade good: Wool.

Kildrummy:
In the province of Mar. Mar was administered by Christina Bruce in nearby Garioch as the child earl, Thomas, was a hostage in England at the time. He received Mar and Garioch in 1357. Should Balliol win the throne, Mar should be created a vassal for Richard Talbot.
Population: 10746 (c.1290*), 19688 (1755)
Trade good: Wool.

Kingussie:
Best name I can think of for the province of Badenoch. It was mostly Gaelic until the 20th Century. Should belong at game start to a vassal earl of Moray.
Population: 3449 (c. 1290*), 7442 of which 136 Catholic (1755)
Trade good: Lumber or game.

Kirkcaldy:
Should begin in 1337 belonging to a vassal Fife.
Population: 14355 (c. 1290*), 23706 (1755)
Trade good: Coal or salt.

Kirkcudbright:
Population: 21111 (c. 1290*), 17067 (1755)
Trade good: Wool.

Lanark:
Population: 11870 (c. 1290*), 22880 (1755)
Trade good: Horses or sturdy grains.

Lewis:
Population: 2150 (c. 1290*), 6386 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Linlinthgow:
West Lothian. An early centre of leather goods.
6192 (c. 1290*), 16829 (1755), 17844 (1801), 19451 (1811), 22685 (1821), 23291 (1831), 26872 (1841)
Trade goods: Livestock.

Maybole:
The southern third of Ayrshire was the province of Carrick, centred at Maybole. It was attached to the royal family since Robert the Bruce, earl of Carrick, was crowned king in 1306.
Population: 8237 (c. 1290*), 10812 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock, or sturdy grains.

Montrose:
In eastern Angus; I've drawn it to be centred around Montrose and the cathedral town of Brechin. It was an important port city and exported hides and salmon.
Population: 13256 (c. 1290*), 15710 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock, or fish.

Mull:
Should begin in 1337 as belonging to Ruaidhri mac Ailein, who has been stripped of Lorne (Dunollie) by now. Should Balliol win the crown, they should also acquire Lorne. Mull passed to the Lordsip of the Isles by marriage in 1346.
Population: 7230 (c. 1290*), 11747 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Nairn:
An important royal city; should belong in 1337 under the vassal Moray (see Elgin).
Population: 1745 (c. 1290*), 5694 (1755), 8322 (1801), 8496 (1811), 9268 (1821), 9354 (1831), 9217 (1841)
Trade good: Sand.

Orkney:
Population: 23381 (1755), 24445 (1801), 23238 (1811), 26979 (1821), 28847 (1831), 30507 (1841)

Paisley:
Renfrewshire; the Port of Glasgow was built here in the 18th Century.
Population: 13823 (c. 1290*), 26645 (1755), 78501 (1801), 93172 (1811), 112175 (1821), 133443 (1831), 155072 (1841)
Trade good: Iron or wool.

Peebles:
Population: 17772 (c. 1290), 8908 (1755), 8735 (1801), 9935 (1811), 10046 (1821), 10578 (1831), 10499 (1841)
Trade good: Wool or livestock.

Perth:
Population: 24322 (c. 1290*), 33565 (1755)

Peterhead:
Best name I could think of for the province of Buchan.
Population: 24414 (c. 1290*), 44730 (1755)

Selkirk:
Population: 4039 (c. 1290), 4021 (1755), 5388 (1801), 5889 (1811), 6837 (1821), 6833 (1831), 7990 (1841)
Trade good: Lumber.

Shetland:
Population: 15210 (1755), 22379 (1801), 22915 (1811), 26145 (1821), 29392 (1831), 30558 (1841)

Skye:
In 1337 Skye had been conquered by the earls of Ross. This would pass to the Lords of the Isles with the rest of Ross in 1411.
Population: 2833 (c. 1290*), 12195 of which 582 Catholic (1755)

St Andrews:
Population: 13054 (c. 1290*), 21557 (1755)

Stirling:
Population: 24684 (c.1290), 37014 (1755), 50825 (1801), 58174 (1811), 65376 (1821), 72621 (1831), 82057 (1841)

Stonehaven:
For the province of the Mearns (Kincardineshire).
Population: 14273 (c. 1290), 23057 (1755), 26349 (1801), 27439 (1811), 29118 (1821), 31431 (1831), 33075 (1841)

Stranraer:
Important port of Wigtownshire. Should Balliol win the Scottish throne, Duncan MacDouall should petition for the restitution of rule in Stranraer and Wigtown.
Population: 9088 (c. 1290*), 8321 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Tain:
An important town in northern Ross, and a centre of pilgrimage to the shrine of St Duthac. The town was resentful of its rule by the earls of Ross, who had violated its sanctuary to hand the family of Robert the Bruce to the English in the first War of Scottish Independence.
Population: 2743 (c. 1290*), 14406 (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Tarbert:
Best name for the province of Kintyre.
Population: 9138 (c. 1290*), 14848 (1755)

Thurso:
Should Caithness be split, the northern bit.
Population: 1171 (c. 1290*), 11891 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Tioram:
For the province of Garmoran. Should belong at game start to a vassal Uist.
Population: 1932 (c. 1290*), 3139 of which 1065 Catholic (1755*)

Tongue:
Population: 1174 (c. 1290*), 3893 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Uist:
Should be a vassal also owning Tioram.
Population: 5268 of which 3140 Catholic (1755)

Urquhart:
A split of Inverness location, if that was drawn to a more accurate representation. Should belong to Moray vassal in 1337.
Population: 1124 (c. 1290*), 8097 of which 1055 Catholic (1755)
Trade good: Livestock.

Wick:
Should Caithness be split, the southern bit.
Population: 1061 (c. 1290*), 10324 (1755)
Trade good: Fish.

Wigtown:
Should Balliol win the Scottish throne, Duncan MacDouall should petition for the restitution of rule in Wigtown and Stranraer.
Population: 8895 (c. 1290*), 8145 (1755)
Trade good: Horses.
Seeing as the British Isles map feedback is coming next week, I'd just wanted to bring up a couple of things relating to Scotland. I see that Ireland and Wales have been discussed a fair bit, but there have been comparatively few comments on Scotland.

Hellfirematt's map looks fantastic, and really captures the region. That said, I can understand if it were considered that there are too many locations present. That said, are a few that I think should be added that really seem missing from the original map. I'd hope that these changes could be considered even if some of the more detailed suggestions might be too complicated or unbalanced:

  • Paisley or other town in Renfrewshire: Either Paisley, Renfrew, or Greenock, I'd say. Renfrewshire is any area with a markedly different economy to Glasgow, and with several important towns during this time period. During the game's timeframe, there had been a significant rivalry between Paisley and Glasgow, and either could have become the region's major centre. Paisley itself was a big player in the regional textile trade - particularly later in the game's timeframe. Renfrew was the site of a politically important castle, and an important county seat, while Greenock was an important port at the mouth of the Clyde that was an important trade port before the Industrial revolution and the growth of Glasgow. It was only really in the late 18th century when the Clyde was dredged that larger trade ships were able to go to Glasgow directly -- previously Greenock had been the main port for transatlantic trade. It is worth noting that Renfrewshire has always been politically separate from Glasgow as well.
  • Linlithgow: This is an area that doesn't seem to suit being lumped in with either Edinburgh or Stirling. It would have been a primarily rural and agricultural area (could produce either wheat or leather, which was a significant product produced there in the later stages of the game's timeframe). Linlithgow itself was an important regional town. A location here would help to capture towns like Linlithgow, Falkirk, Bo'Ness, etc. which don't really seem to fit when lumped in with either Edinburgh or Stirling.
  • Glasgow Glasgow is currently shows as being coastal, and represents Renfrewshire more than it does Lanarkshire. The Glasgow location should be moved further east, with the firth of Clyde being more pronounced. The Glasgow location should encompass part of the area currently lumped in with Lanark, and potentially some of the southwestern area of the Stirling location.
  • Scone: Scone should be part of the Perth location, wile I'd recommend that the current Scone location be renamed to either Blairgowrie or Dunkeld.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
I'm sad tbh. I was planning on making a sarky lil "it's only a map feedback thread, Michael, how long can it take? a year?" post on the anniversary. Put it in my calendar and everything.
 
  • 6Haha
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Looking at Laith's video playing in England, you can see a bunch of changes compared to the in-progress map:

-Basingstoke added (this could be intuited from the port suitability maps)

-Wesminster cut and replaced with Barking to the east of London (very interesting since the original Dev Diary specifically mentioned Westminster, not London is the capital - a design change?). Thames estuary was also expanded to make London coastal, very cool!

-Trowsbridge replaces Swindon

-Lichfield replaces Tamworth

-Kettering and Daventry replace Naseby and Corby

-Manchester returns to the map, replacing Salford again

-the unnamed location north of Hexham is now Bellingham (spelled as Billingham? - would have went with Elsdon personally, but there just aren't great choices here)

-Beverley is still not back in East Yorkshire :( The location really is awkward

-Flint, Llangollen and Builth added in Wales (the last replacing Radnor)

-Ewyas and Wigmore replacing Kington and Leominster (tbh don't understand why Leominster was cut, its wool trade made it a very wealthy and notable town)

There's more changes in Wales and Ireland, but we can't see the locations so its more difficult to see them all
 
  • 2Love
Reactions:
I’m going to post this now, but will probably have to post it again on Monday.
So from the various videos posted we can see that the starting population of England, despite some feedback in this thread, hasn’t changed and is roughly 5.3 million. That’s too high.

This paper provides some context regarding population estimates in England.
Population after the Black Death can be estimated with relatively high accuracy and they have England’s population stagnant at ~2.3 million throughout the 15th century. If the starting population was more than 5 million, that would mean that the Black Death would have to kill over 55% of the population to get to historical levels.
1746744945355.png

Estimating the pre-Black Death population is harder, but by analyzing agricultural production, they come to the conclusion that the output at the time couldn’t have sustained more than 4.25 million people, and that the population already started to decline before the Black Death, with agriculture at its limit.
Thus they place their estimates at 4.25 million for 1300 and 3.83 for 1348.
1746744979346.png

I believe that the population of England needs to be reduced by a million, and at this level, it should be basically maxing out food production already.
If England can be comfortably at over 5 million population in 1337, this does not represent the historical situation well at all. England couldn’t feed that many people at that time and even going above 4 million made it very overpopulated.
1746744869942.png

The first time England reached 5.3 million was in 1650, during the Agricultural Revolution. (If you’re curious why the population shrank between 1650 and 1700, an estimated 700k people emigrated from England to the colonies in the 17th century, plus quite a few things happened around 1650!)

Also, when comparing the population of individual provinces with the numbers provided in this post, it's obvious that they basically all have a higher population than the 1290 population that listed in the post, even though it should probably be lower. I haven't read the linked 2014 book, though, so I don't know if they make new arguments suggesting that England could in fact sustain a population above 4.25 million. In either case, it should be well below 5 million.
1746744820472.png
 
  • 5Like
  • 2
Reactions:
What do we think?

Way too easy to conquer the entire island, in my opinion. I do like that you can declare on the earldoms without calling in England, and I hope there's a way to strip territory from the Pale without directly declaring on England for the territory outside of the Pale proper.

I would prefer the ideal strategy to be to spend some time building up the country, both your army for conquest and your prestige/reputation/etc for diplomacy, then unite the High Kingdom.

I'm not sure how long it should take, but fifty years feels very fast. I'd prefer closer to one hundred, maybe one fifty? Or would that get boring to play? Hard to say at the moment.

Edit: Forgot to mention, I like the dynamic naming, I assume primary culture Irish gives you 'Éire' as the name of the formable, whereas the Anglo-Irish version would be Ireland.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions:

What do we think?
Doesnt seem this guy interacted with the "High King" special mechanic/International organisation at all, seems he just became it after all the other Irish lords were annexed.

With regards to an Irish lord declaring war on Anglo Irish lord such as Kildare I'm not sure I'd like to see England being able to get fully involved in the war, maybe they can have the option to appeal to England who sent them 500/1000 troops or monetary aid for example rather than full blown ally bringing their doomstacks.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
Reactions:
Way too easy to conquer the entire island, in my opinion. I do like that you can declare on the earldoms without calling in England, and I hope there's a way to strip territory from the Pale without directly declaring on England for the territory outside of the Pale proper.

I would prefer the ideal strategy to be to spend some time building up the country, both your army for conquest and your prestige/reputation/etc for diplomacy, then unite the High Kingdom.

I'm not sure how long it should take, but fifty years feels very fast. I'd prefer closer to one hundred, maybe one fifty? Or would that get boring to play? Hard to say at the moment.

Edit: Forgot to mention, I like the dynamic naming, I assume primary culture Irish gives you 'Éire' as the name of the formable, whereas the Anglo-Irish version would be Ireland.
It's definitely fast, but in EU4 you could unite Ireland in like 5-10 years. Definitely progress, and balancing the speed of conquest is very hard, especially if you also want to model historical great conquerors
 
Way too easy to conquer the entire island, in my opinion. I do like that you can declare on the earldoms without calling in England, and I hope there's a way to strip territory from the Pale without directly declaring on England for the territory outside of the Pale proper.

I would prefer the ideal strategy to be to spend some time building up the country, both your army for conquest and your prestige/reputation/etc for diplomacy, then unite the High Kingdom.

I'm not sure how long it should take, but fifty years feels very fast. I'd prefer closer to one hundred, maybe one fifty? Or would that get boring to play? Hard to say at the moment.

Edit: Forgot to mention, I like the dynamic naming, I assume primary culture Irish gives you 'Éire' as the name of the formable, whereas the Anglo-Irish version would be Ireland.
Yeah he is the type of youtuber I hate where he mostly posts exploits. So I think it was a poor choice from paradox to have 0 guard rails. In saying that, I think you are maybe right that 40 years is too short but maybe not. I think if you really hit the magic rng i think it should probably be possible but not the way he did it. But again I do think thats a game wide thing atm watching some of the other youtubers play the game.

I really hope its renamed Gael culture for all the reasons I listed before. Especially if you have Éire as the Gaelic Formable. Irish is what the Normans percieved of themselves and if for example Kildare unites the country its called Ireland again this just so jarring to me. And yes to repeat myself we should rename Highlander to Highland-Gael. That signifies how close the two cultures are.

Couple of other things I noticed when Ireland was formed he could increase it to Duchy, but his countries name was Ríocht of Éire. Which absolutely LOVE. THANK YOU @SaintDaveUK . However Ríocht meaning Kingdom and I'm pretty sure i seen other Irish Minors being called Ríocht without a formable. Not sure that should be the case unless they are of Kingdom rank. I think as well the Gaelic lords countries should be their actual names rather than the anglisation of them if we have Éire. E.g. Leinster should be Laighin or Ulster Uladh Tyrone as Tír Eoghain. I hope this isn't too much of an ask.

Noticed the Gaelic flavour name for Parliment is Dáil, this is great as well better than Oireachtas which was originally suggested.

I think the English should only step in to save Pale if Dublin Castle itself is threatened as the Pale itself was historically stripped of land without direct English intervention.

Yeah was really disappointed when he didn't open any of the IO panels at the bottom once. Whats the point in having youtubers play the game and getting early access and they don't actually interact with mechanics properly?

I did see that one event of the Pale asking you to convert to them was actually pretty cool, why did it trigger? Was it an IO thing? Was it because you became a certain size? Was really hard to know.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
Yeah was really disappointed when he didn't open any of the IO panels at the bottom once. Whats the point in having youtubers play the game and getting early access and they don't actually interact with mechanics properly?
Rewatched the video again, and yeah, I'm pretty sure there's a lot to the High Kingship IO that he missed, including probably an easier / more 'correct' way of becoming the leader, and likely a way of upgrading to Kingdom rank. Still, it leaves a surprise for us to find out about later. Perhaps SaintDaveUK will show us a glimpse in the map review...
Unlikely, as that's flavour content, but you never know, they might be willing to show more things now that the game has been announced.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions: