• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Victoria 3 - Dev Diary #117 - The UX of Sphere of Influence

16_9.png

Hi, Aron here. I’m one of the User Experience (UX) designers on Vicky 3 and I would like to give you an overview of our UX focus we have had in the Sphere of Influence expansion and the accompanying free update. I will start with the UX focus for our new features followed by the more general improvements.

Subject Improvements​

In this feature we have broadened the agency you have over your Subjects as an Overlord significantly. You can read more in-depth about the feature here. Naturally, we have put the majority of the interactions under the Diplomacy panel to have a clear central place to look for them, but also to make this panel more interactable. Previously, it has been more of an informational panel than a place where you interact, but that we are here to change!

DD117_01.png

However, many of these actions are things you want to be able to do on the go which led us to work a lot with our context menus such as our right-click menus. One of the most used right-click menus in the game is the Country & State right-click menu, but it is also one of the largest. Unsurprisingly enough, it is the right-click menu we wanted to put even more things into now as we have added ways for you to interact with your Subject and your Overlord. This sparked some rethinking of how we can make the right-click menus more compact while still retaining the intuitivity.

End result,
  • The common actions such as “Go-to country”, “Pin country to Outliner”, and “Zoom-to country” have been moved to the headers with simple icon buttons, following the standard we already have set up for them in other panels.
  • Actions that go under the same category such as Diplomatic Actions, Subject Actions, Overlord Actions, and Bloc Member Actions get to live under their own drop-down menu.

DD117_02.png

Before:The current chonky Country right-click menu in 1.6.

DD117_03.png

After: Right-clicking Hannover as Great Britain now gives a heavily compacted right-click menu with your Overlord Actions and Diplomatic Actions neatly grouped under their respective drop-down menu.

DD117_04.png

Opening the Overlord Actions drop-down gives you the full list of potential actions.

DD117_05.png

Similarly, right-clicking one of your own States neatly stores all Decrees under its own drop-down menu. Also notice the smaller round buttons for go-to, zoom-to and pin/unpin next to the Country and State headers.

This might be more of a technical improvement on the development side of things, but it definitely benefits us all in the end. The Subject, Overlord, and Bloc Member Actions all fall under the same umbrella as Diplomatic Actions and it was clear early on during development of this expansion that we were in dire need to get their tooltips sorted out with a clear pattern with all of these new actions coming in. Both to make it easier to work with them and to benefit the end result for us players. We have two versions of tooltips, fancy custom tooltips (Cooltips) and regular tooltips, that might not be obvious to you as a player, but if you are implementing them, there is a very clear difference in what you can do with them. The regular tooltip gives us very little flexibility to what you can do since it is basically only a long text string that we build with line breaks while the Cooltip essentially is another UI panel where we have full flexibility to do whatever the GUI system can do (everything!). In other words, me as a UX designer can do a lot of cool changes directly in a Cooltip without much of a hassle while it is much more of a struggle editing regular tooltips, generally speaking. You would mainly see the difference in-game by looking at the tooltip headers and the structure of the tooltip. Most of the time, a Cooltip has an icon in the top left corner with a larger header and a type concept in the top right corner, while the regular tooltip has no icon and only a regular text header. If the tooltip feels a bit nicer and a bit more structured, it is most likely a Cooltip, even though we do have some nice regular tooltips out there as well of course.

We took the time to move all of the above Diplomatic Actions over to a Cooltip, meaning we (especially I) get more direct agency over these tooltips, what they contain and how they are structured. The Diplomatic Actions are still very text heavy tooltips, but I will bring this up again later when we talk about Power Blocs and you will see more of the neat power of Cooltips.

DD117_06.png

The “Guarantee Independence” Diplomatic Action as a typical regular tooltip with a normal header, a breaking line followed by the rest of the tooltip content. In this case, most of it is coming from code making it difficult for me as a UX designer to change anything on the go.

DD117_07.png

The same action as a typical Cooltip with an icon and a larger header that easily can be made contextual. In this case, we are hovering the button for an ongoing “Guaranteeing Independence” action and it gives us the action prompt of “Stop doing this” rather than just the name of the action. In the Cooltip, I can be the one adding this contextual header, while in a regular tooltip I could not and I would have to steal precious time from one of our programmers. This goes for all you modders out there as well, go crazy!

In a similar fashion, we have worked on the confirmation popups for the Diplomatic Actions to be consistent with the tooltips and clearly show the difference of starting and stopping an action.
DD117_08.png

The confirmation popup for “Stop Guarantee Independence”.

Lobbies​

Political Lobbies are a quite straightforward feature from a UX perspective (read more about Lobbies here).

While you probably will encounter Lobbies more often in Events and Journal entries, or by seeing their reactions to various diplomatic actions, they also have an info panel when selected.
DD117_09.png

The new Lobby info panel.

In the Lobby info panel, you can see each Interest Group that supports the Lobby along with their Approval (since it is directly impacted by the Lobby’s overall Appeasement).

Most importantly, you can also see all actions that would affect this Lobby’s Appeasement. While the Lobbies that are in the game currently are somewhat straightforward (Pro-Lobbies encourage you to do friendly actions towards their favored Country). This is something we have the potential to greatly expand upon in the future and make it more involved.

DD117_10.png

An Interest Groups’ support of this Lobby.

You can also see why a certain Interest Group is supporting this Lobby. While it might be unlikely that you can force an Interest Group out of a Lobby due to their reasons, it does mean it is easier to tell why Lobbies form in the first place.

We also wanted players to be able to see Lobbies outside their own Country. While this may not affect your decisions as often as your own Lobbies, it is still nice to see the people of other Countries reacting to your benevolent power projection. As such we use the map mode in the Political Lens to show your Lobbies, along with any Lobbies from other Countries that concern your Country.

DD117_11.png

Map markers for your Lobbies targeting other countries and other countries Lobbies targeting you in either a pro or anti way.

DD117_12.png

Lobbies in Foreign Countries appear in their respective Countries’ Info Panel.

Building Ownership Revision & Foreign Investment​

When we started development of the Building Ownership Revision & Foreign investment (read more about the feature specifics here), we had to create several early prototypes to see if this is feasible to communicate in a good and intuitive way before giving this feature the green light. Buildings are such a fundamental piece of our game and making any major changes to them must be made with care. The prototypes showed that the struggle will definitely be to illustrate who owns what of a specific building and how much, but also the opposite perspective, when looking at a Financial District for example, which buildings the Financial District owns and how much of each building, from which country, and so on. This is also where we have spent the most time to ensure it is properly communicated to the player.

We ended up with a combination of ways of illustrating this division of a building’s ownership. Some more clear than others, but our hope is that the combination of all of them will make it intuitive.

To visually represent the combination of ownership of a specific building, we used a horizontal bar divided by ownership:
  • The icon on the bar will represent one of the following:
    • Owning Country
    • Owning Pop Type
    • Owning Building
  • The color of the bar represents where the ownership is:
    • Orange: Your government
    • Light Blue: Your pops
    • Gray/white: Local population or government
    • Yellow: Foreign investors that are not you
    • We have tried using colors that work best for most color blindnesses.

DD117_13.png

If you look at the horizontal bar in the middle, you can see the representation of different ownership based on the instructions above. Also note that you can filter this whole list on “Owner” in the filters to the left. Filters being: All | Nationally Owned | Privately Owned | Foreignly Owned.

Similarly, we use the same kind of horizontal bar for Financial Districts and Manor Houses that owns other buildings, but then it is divided by the buildings it owns:
  • The icon on the bar will represent the building it owns.
  • The color is from the country of the building it owns.
DD117_14.png

Note the Manor Houses with their red horizontal bars indicating that all buildings they own are buildings in Great Britain as Great Britain's map color is red.

These specific patterns might not be intuitive to start with when you do not know them and have no one explaining them to you, but the intention is for it to become a subconscious thing that you learn as you play. In the end, you will probably not notice when and how this helps you see the different ownerships since you have been exposed to them through the whole game and gradually learnt them, all the while you now only glance at the bar and instantly know what owns what (insert Praying Patrick meme here).

We have also experimented with putting some visualization of ownership on the map, working with arrows pointing from the owned building to the owning building. While doing so, we ended up adding visualization to input and output of Goods to a building as well. It all resulted in a big mix of arrows pointing and animating in all kinds of directions on the map. It felt a tad bit overwhelming at first, so we tweaked and toned it down slightly, and after playing with it for a while many of us felt we could not play without it.


DD117_15.png


In the example of looking at the Tooling Workshop in Burgundy above you can see all of the following on the map:
  • Ownership arrows are yellow and they go from the building’s State to the owning Building (Manor House or Financial District).​
  • Ownership arrows are red if the owning building is a Government building and the arrows then go from your Capital State to the building instead.​
  • Input Goods arrows are orange.​
  • Output Goods arrows are green.​
  • Arrows are thick if in the same state, a bit thinner if in a neighboring state, and very thin and transparent if further away.​

DD117_16.png

For Financial Districts, you get a visual representation on the map of where in the world it has invested its money by looking at the animating yellow arrows.

DD117_17.gif

Arrows for Input and Output of Goods animating to or out from the selected building, and oh yes, you can cycle through the associated buildings more easily now as all buildings that have anything to do with the selected building show up as map markers on the map and you can click them.

DD117_18.gif

This Financial District owns a whole bunch of stuff for sure! Indicated by all the animated arrows going to this Financial District. The specific number of building levels owned by this Financial District are shown as a number on each of the owned buildings on the map with the accumulated total being the total level of the Financial District (25 in this case).

Power Blocs​

One new left side menu button, a whole new panel, several new popups, and several new large scale visualizations on the map. This feature is grand. Trying to tie it all together UX wise has been a lovely challenge. You can read the specifics about Power Blocs here, but also a shout out to the awesome Art we have seen from the Art team especially for this feature as Max is telling you all about in the Art of Sphere of Influence.

Being in a Power Bloc is a grand thing. We want you to experience that and clearly feel how it is affecting you in all its pros and cons (mostly pros). Since Power Blocs are such grand things, we have worked a lot with the visual representation of them on the map, giving you full customizability of your Power Bloc if you happen to form one or be the leader of one, to give each Power Bloc its true unique feeling and look. This is of course mirrored in the mechanics as the different Central Identity Pillars are profoundly different from each other in what they do and unlock. Add the Principles to the mix and the options are quite varied, and I need to make tooltips that fits all this variation! As you may imagine, all the possible versions of a Power Bloc have been a challenge to present in a way that does not mean custom solutions for each version. One way we have tackled this is early structuring of game concepts and being consistent in the use of them. An example of this is the way we have structured the Central Identity Pillar’s cooltip into segments based on the game concepts of: Power Bloc, All Bloc Members, Bloc Leader, and Non-leader Bloc Members. This structure is then reused in all other identities’ cooltips with a segment potentially being removed if there are no effects for that specific game concept / group in that Identity.

DD117_19.png

The cooltip for the Central Identity Pillar “Military Treaty”.

DD117_20.png

The cooltip for the Central Identity Pillar “Religious Convocation”. To tie this back to how neat Cooltips are, if you look at the Primary Principle Groups in the above cooltips, you get to see the true power of the Cooltips as we have the ability to put larger icons, boxes, and basically whatever we feel like into the tooltip itself. This would not be possible in a regular tooltip that is text only.

As a more general thing for update 1.7, we have worked a lot with making sure most of the new concepts and values we have added have icons associated with them for better recognizability and coherence. New concepts like Leverage, Cohesion, and Power Bloc Members all get their unique icon as you can see below.

DD117_21.png

The WIP list of all Power Blocs at the start of the game. Each Power Bloc rocking its own style.

General Improvements for 1.7​

Those icons work as a perfect segway to the more general UX improvements coming in the free update 1.7 accompanying the expansion. First out, the Outliner. In 1.6 we were sooo done with the old chonky outliner and replaced it with something new and fresh. As always when you replace anything with something new, there are a lot of edges to smooth out and the outliner was no exception. In 1.7, we have taken another pass and delved into more of these edges and details. Among many smaller tweaks, the outliner has been compacted even more with additional dropdown menus. Both ongoing diplomatic actions and the list of players (in multiplayer) are now under their own dropdown menus if there are more than one at any time. Some of the already existing dropdowns such as Interest Groups have also been changed to be closed by default.

DD117_22.png

The outliner with some ongoing diplomatic actions under a dropdown menu.​

Next up, in association with the Foreign Investment feature, we have taken a pass on the construction queue. One thing we noticed during early playtesting was the lack of feedback when foreign investment is happening and where it is happening. This was both from the perspective of you doing the foreign investment and others investing in you. We then took the liberty to split the construction queue up into clearer parts. A national queue and a foreign queue, the national queue includes everything you or your pops are building both domestically and abroad while the foreign queue includes everything other Countries or their pops are building in your Country. We added filters to your national queue for both the location (domestic or abroad) and funding (where does the money come from).

DD117_23.png

Your national queue with the filters open.

DD117_24.png

In a second tab of the Construction panel, you find all foreign queues in your country grouped by country.

Apart from these larger general UX improvements, we have been working hard with tweaking the UI and UX based on your feedback from the forums and discord, so please do not be shy and keep the feedback coming. We might not be responding to it all, but we for sure are collecting and reading all of it. For now, I hope you enjoyed getting a small glimpse from a UX perspective of Victoria 3’s first major expansion. You will have to wait for the patch notes to see all of the UX and UI improvements in detail. Take care until then or come back next week to delve deeper into the Power Bloc feature with our lead game designer Lino!
 
  • 89Like
  • 66Love
  • 4
  • 4
  • 1
Reactions:
It would be great if you could prevent or at least incetivise or deincentivise private and foreign inverstors on what to build. If not outright ban certain buildings from being expanded automatically, at least modify the weights. Maybe make it like with import/export that some building types have taxes associated, either on state or national level.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
As in you set up at its creation the conditions upon which the alliance can be called upon (only defense, only offense, only against a single country, only against major powers and up, etc.), and the conditions define the cost in diplomatic influence.
Correct, that is what I would’ve liked and was expecting from a mechanic called “Power blocs”
 
  • 1
Reactions:
am I the only one wondering at what the impose relgion cb actually implies at at mechanical level, or devine economics while we are at that?
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
we ended up adding visualization to input and output of Goods to a building as well. It all resulted in a big mix of arrows pointing and animating in all kinds of directions on the map. It felt a tad bit overwhelming at first, so we tweaked and toned it down slightly, and after playing with it for a while many of us felt we could not play without it.

Arrows for Input and Output of Goods animating to or out from the selected building, and oh yes, you can cycle through the associated buildings more easily now as all buildings that have anything to do with the selected building show up as map markers on the map and you can click them.
When I'm deciding what buildings to build when (which is the bulk of my play time), half my clicks and mouseovers are spent to gather this information to make each decision. Praise be the UX team.

Now on the note of new ways to use arrows for presenting information, there are two things I'd like to see in a future expansion after SoI gets out:
  • Arrows showing employee movements instead of goods movements. The tooltips know how many people changed jobs from what building to what other building. I find joy in tracking down how the workforce is reacting to a new building going up. I would like to see this visually. All the arrows concentrating on a new building and other buildings getting arrows for where they found replacement workers. If possible, I'd also like to see where unemployed workers go: I want to know what happened to the people who couldn't find work in one state and vanished when the week ticked. Especially if they're migrating to other countries.
    • Bonus points if I get an event (which can pause the game) when something extraordinary happens: a noble changing jobs to a lowly machinist; a capitalist changing jobs to join a foreign country's financial district; peasants who rise up to be nobles in one single job change.
  • After the player selects a single Pop need and a single country, arrows showing where this need is being serviced from. I want to see whether my pops are meeting their food needs from my lands or a foreigner's. Or rather, I want to see where my rival's pops are getting their food from so I can disrupt their breadbasket then show up for diplomacy. Bonus points if the AI notices this kind of weakness.

Vic3 will live or die by how good the data visualisation is. Other GSGs have battles to focus number-based storytelling. Vic3 made the bet that economy, internal politics and diplomacy can tell just as engaging stories. Please let the stories in those numbers be conspicuous.
 
  • 6Like
  • 2
Reactions:
I see your point. But we still have Alliances though. They are not going anywhere if I am not mistaken. Triple Entete or Central Powers can be quite well represented as a tripple-alliance in Vic3, if you manage to create and keep it.

NATO or Warsaw Pact no so much, that´s true. But they are from another era, anyway :) So my point is it is no that bad, the layer of stategic cooperation you are asking for is not missing completely. Its just not that detailed as powerblocs. But its there.
It seems to me NATO could be perfectly well represented by a power bloc with the USA as leader and the warsaw pact as one with USSR as leader.

We already have a system for representing alliances between powers with no hierarchical steucture between them. I agree that system should be improved, though (especially a way to avoid the AI suddenly breaking alliance for no reason). A trust/favour system a la EU4 would be great).
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions:
This looks great as long as we can toggle the different types of arrows. Can you add general ideology icons next to their interest group? And employment and reserves bars to firms in the half screen builder? And can you add Prestige, Infamy, Legitimacy, Convoys, Flotillas, Battalions, and Innovation/Cap to the top bar under the existing info like this now dead mod?

Also "jobseekers" including people who already have jobs is really confusing.
 
Last edited:
So... Power blocs are spheres of influence? Or are they proper multinational treaties? And why can't a country belong to more than one?

Very odd design choices.
They are spheres of influence. Those spheres take different forms, but they are fundamentally unipolar in nature, and obviously a country can't belong to more than one sphere of influence at once.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
They are spheres of influence. Those spheres take different forms, but they are fundamentally unipolar in nature, and obviously a country can't belong to more than one sphere of influence at once.
The name is really disingenuous, then, as others remarked. The expansion is named Sphere of Influence, so why is its main feature named "power blocs" if those are in reality spheres of influence?

I have to say, while I like the ownership rework, the lobbies and the subject rework, I think power blocs and "the great games" are the weakest aspect of this expansion.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
The name is really disingenuous, then, as others remarked. The expansion is named Sphere of Influence, so why is its main feature named "power blocs" if those are in reality spheres of influence?

I have to say, while I like the ownership rework, the lobbies and the subject rework, I think power blocs and "the great games" are the weakest aspect of this expansion.
I'm not sure I'd call it disingenuous- inappropriate, sure. Remember hanlon's razor :p
 
  • 2
Reactions:
Correct, that is what I would’ve liked and was expecting from a mechanic called “Power blocs”
The only definition of "power bloc" i can find is : "In international relations, a power bloc is an association of groups, especially nations, having a common interest and acting as a single political force."

So indeed the big alliances you mentionned could be a kind of powerbloc, but Zollverein is as well. Maybe there just need to be other central identity pillars to reflect that, and the possibility to be part of different powerbloc as long as the have a differrent central identity pillar.
 
  • 5Like
Reactions:
Nice DD, looking forward to playing with the new UI.

One concern that jumped at me was collapsed state context menu.
Doesn't that mean that e.g. enabling&disabling edicts now takes an extra click?
Is it an idea to make collapse/expand state stick, i.e. if you expand it once it stays expanded on the next open?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
This is what's disappointing to me about this expansion. It feels so... muddied in concept and so video gamey in execution. When I hear the phrase "power bloc", my mind goes to the Triple Entente and the Central Powers, NATO and the Warsaw Pact, The Triple Alliance, the Napoleonic era Coalitions, the German Confederation, that sort of thing. Large organizations of numerous states of all different levels of power coming together as [nominal] equals by some common cause [usually an ideology and / or a commitment for mutual defense against a competing nation / ideology / power bloc]. But the actual thing we are being shown here isn't that, it's just the spheres of influence of Great Powers. Which is a very important thing to be in the game and I am happy that they are being added, but why are they called one thing if they are so clearly a different thing? There's no clear incentive for any great power or even most major powers to be part of another Power Bloc, and at game start they are all broken up. So why roadblock yourself out of adding actual multi-state power blocs down the road by calling your sphere of influence mechanic a 'power bloc'?

It's just strange. I really do enjoy Victoria III and do play it a lot, but sometimes the design choices they make are just baffling. And there's this consistent feeling of adding new mechanics and ideas that feel unfinished and simplistic in their execution [agitators, companies, the military rework, now power blocs], on the hope that they will become more fleshed out, balanced, and engaging at some unknown point in the future. I know this is to be somewhat expected of all PDX games, but with Vicky III the feeling of the game being in a perpetual beta is really strong.
There's nothing wrong with the mechanics conceptually, they're just named in a way which seems to broadly be more evocative of something else, similarly to how the general reaction to Companies was "this seems fine, but they don't feel very company-like" (although that is at least confirmed to be something likely to change, eventually).

I would guess that they're unfortunately not going to rename a major DLC feature at this point but I am sure that there must be something out there better than "Power Bloc" to represent this set of systems. Personally I'm rather baffled as to why they're not just called Spheres of Influence...

Great dev diary, I am seeing that religion is becoming more important in the game with it receiving its own power bloc theme. Currently there is no map to view religion so are there any plans to add religion as a map mode?
They have confirmed in a previous DD that there is now a religion mapmode.
 
  • 6Like
Reactions:
There's nothing wrong with the mechanics conceptually, they're just named in a way which seems to broadly be more evocative of something else, similarly to how the general reaction to Companies was "this seems fine, but they don't feel very company-like" (although that is at least confirmed to be something likely to change, eventually).

I would guess that they're unfortunately not going to rename a major DLC feature at this point but I am sure that there must be something out there better than "Power Bloc" to represent this set of systems. Personally I'm rather baffled as to why they're not just called Spheres of Influence...


They have confirmed in a previous DD that there is now a religion mapmode.
If you literally called them Spehres of Influence the Vic2 community would have been on fire…
 
  • 2Haha
Reactions:
Would I be able to either limit foreign ownership in my country and exploit others

Also as Prussia I own all the furniture industry in sweden. But I want to ensure that no other foreign nation has property in sweden, how to ensure this
 
Agreed! We're looking at what final modifiers we want on some of the identities and principles, but generally the -50% mil goods cost here can be seen as a placeholder and not something we intend to have there at release. Thanks for pointing it out!
Hi, could you tell me please whether you plan to add modifiers to change base price of goods?
 
For things like financial districts/companiees, are we going to see companies have some sort of political weighting and support lobbies? Let's say you have a Fruit Company based in the US and they have a lot of plantations in Central America. Then could we see them act as political actors to then lobbying you to gurrantee their independence, bring them into the customs union, etc? They could also be reciprocated in the other country as a force behind the pro-American lobby (in my example at least).

Edit: I wanted to add, can we also have it so companies will help finance wars as lobbies in different countries as infamously done during 'the Banana Wars', particularly conflcits liket between United Fruit and Standard Fruit in Hondoras
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Thanks for the feedback! We'll see what we can do on your first points. A first step would be to sort the list of Diplo Actions with "ongoing" at the top at least. Currently, the dropdown feels very quick and easy to use and we have not seen many issues with the added click to open/close the dropdown so moving the Improve/Damage relations actions outside might be overkill, I would have to test it though. Also worth mentioning is that the menu saves its "state" for the opened/closed dropdowns.

Regarding the performance of the arrows, we've worked hard on it and we would not be adding them to the release unless they are at good performance which they currently are, so all good there!
How hard would it be to add a "favorite" function, so people could click a little icon and it would be "pinned" outside the dropdown, letting people customize how they wish? (Genuine question, I'm no coder)
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: