Awww, I feel special, hunted on the first day, I always wanted to be like the_hdk....
I know
It's not easy
Awww, I feel special, hunted on the first day, I always wanted to be like the_hdk....
better then needles like those steroid popping lot.vote canadiancreed
because he talks to coins.
@GM Have I missed a sub announcement? Joebthegreat is posting like he is in the game, but he isn't in the player list and I dont see a post from you saying who he is subbing.
Clarice is now subbed by Raczynski.
Teep is now subbed by Joebthegreat.
think it's safe to assume you're a stupid wolf.
VOTE MARTY99
Note that I didn't say you are almost certainly a wolf... I simply don't know how you play the game, and I agree with a statement AOK once made. "Never underestimate the stupidity of players"
You voted to save a guy, you vote against someone who tried to kill that guy... and you come up with an argument defending that guy... seems like a lot of protection to give someone seeing as how it's only Day 2.
Shaky evidence, but what the hell, you're a perfectly good Day 2 lynch target... and it's your own damn fault. I wouldn't have even noticed anything if you hadn't gone ahead and, immediately after the update, tried to make arguments defending the person you had just saved with your vote...
(As a side note what happens if we're both villagers? The seer might decide to scan me and the wolves might not eat me because I'm a possible scapegoat for them...
or wait... maybe the wolves eat me because the seer would scan me...
but maybe the seer won't scan me because he predicts the wolves will eat me...
or maybe the wolves will realize the seer won't scan me so they decide to guess for the seer, who I couldn't be...
or maybe I'm the seer and am using this as a ruse to not be noticed because no seer acts this way... and maybe I scan you because there's no way the wolves would make a connection between me and you because I tried to get you lynched...
or maybe the wolves see through this cunning plan and eat me because I'm being a daring seer...
or maybe I'm looking into things too much)
So if were both villagers then you might not be killed? Yes you're right, but theres not a lot of point going after me is there? I know you're just visualising all possible scenarios, but you haven't told me how you hope to survive if I am a wolf, thus you haven't told me a real reason for outing me, the fact is, by your outing, you made it virtually impossible for either of us to survive to the end, as if i die as a goodie then you'll always be a suspect, and if I'm a wolf you'll be killed eventually, but if thats the downside of being active and trying to analyze at least, then so be it(As a side note what happens if we're both villagers? The seer might decide to scan me and the wolves might not eat me because I'm a possible scapegoat for them...
or wait... maybe the wolves eat me because the seer would scan me...
but maybe the seer won't scan me because he predicts the wolves will eat me...
or maybe the wolves will realize the seer won't scan me so they decide to guess for the seer, who I couldn't be...
or maybe I'm the seer and am using this as a ruse to not be noticed because no seer acts this way... and maybe I scan you because there's no way the wolves would make a connection between me and you because I tried to get you lynched...
or maybe the wolves see through this cunning plan and eat me because I'm being a daring seer...
or maybe I'm looking into things too much)
Could you please actually read this? Is it too much to ask?
I'm terribly sorry, but, where I come from, ''safe to assume'' means at least, I dunno know, 95% sure?
If were both villagers, which is still the most probable suggestion, the wolves will know, obviously so they won't hunt you but you'll almost certainly be lynched the next day as I am a villager, either way, there's no point turning this into a race between both of us as if we are both villagers then today will be completely useless for analysing later on (not thats likely anyway, but...)
If everybody would just take 1 minute to read through my previous post you will understand how joeb has no logical motive for outing me if he was a villager, so its either a spur of the moment half thought plan by a goodie or a calculated gamble by a wolf
So if were both villagers then you might not be killed? Yes you're right, but theres not a lot of point going after me is there? I know you're just visualising all possible scenarios, but you haven't told me how you hope to survive if I am a wolf, thus you haven't told me a real reason for outing me, the fact is, by your outing, you made it virtually impossible for either of us to survive to the end, as if i die as a goodie then you'll always be a suspect, and if I'm a wolf you'll be killed eventually
but if thats the downside of being active and trying to analyze at least, then so be it
We need some cat fight emoticons... Where's EURO when we need him. The one with the bleeding eyes just isn't the right one for this...
Every game starts somewhere. It's not completely useless. My argument is simple, and you have done nothing to refute it. YOU ARE BLATENTLY DEFENDING ANTRACER! You voted to save him, you went after the only surviving person who voted for him, and immediately after the update you made a post defending him before anyone had said anything (relevant anyway).
You have gotten extremely upset over me pointing out that your extreme defense of antracer was odd.
Now, quit wasting my time unless you want to post an actual reason you decided to go ahead and outright defend antracer (not just in your vote, but why you felt the need to defend him today and go after the only surviving person who voted him).
Hey, you've nailed that point at least. Yes, being active kills people. It won't stop me from posting my thoughts in this game, or any other WW game.
If I hear one more stupid argument about my possible motives for outing anybody, I'll do absolutely nothing about it.
They didn't have a part about this in your argument book...? This type of retort is in a few of the books I have read. It's a bad move. It shows your weakness as much as anger. Never cut off a part of someone's argument this way. You alienate them, denying yourself the chance to prevail. You also minimize the amount your listener will get from you by fostering the attitude 'well, if he won't listen to me...' Better to have a short and sweet reply to steer the 'discussion' to the aforementioned grounds that are shaky. In this way, the action becomes associated with a negative feeling in the other person, and they will naturally begin to steer away from it to avoid the negative they are experiencing. It will prompt them to move to a more positive position, which exposes more fronts for you to exploit... It's nice to see I'm not the only one who likes to type...![]()
I said I wouldn't do anything didn't I?
Besides I thought I had already kind of shown the whole motives argument to be irrelevent. Sure he can still use that argument, but how would that not make him look silly? Perhaps my goal is differant than what you think it is?
Anyway, this enlightening conversation makes me want to buy you a beer... I must bow to your ability to manipulate words in such a fasion.