• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Thanks for your voting record Olaus. It helps a lot.

I must say I'm rather clueless at this point actually. I'd add Olaus to that list of suspects because you've not been receiving any attention in the voting. And as always I believe itäs best to have at least two people in the running.

Thus. Vote Olaus Petrus
 
Thanks for your voting record Olaus. It helps a lot.

I must say I'm rather clueless at this point actually. I'd add Olaus to that list of suspects because you've not been receiving any attention in the voting. And as always I believe itäs best to have at least two people in the running.

Thus. Vote Olaus Petrus

I pointed out a wolf and suggested that humancalulator isn't good lynch, it's more than others have done for the village in that past couple of days. But if you find me good suspect nevetheless, then go ahead and lynch me.
 
I still think both Lem and Jamie are the last two wolfs...


jonti wake up and help us :)


Vote Lemeard

HC was a bad lynch and lem started the run for him.
I did the what now?

Jamie voted HC before I did and The_Split advocated HC's lynching before I voted him. How on earth do you get that to me starting the run on him?

Not even Olaus believed that HC was a bad lynch and instead put him in the "not cleared" group.
 
I did the what now?

Jamie voted HC before I did and The_Split advocated HC's lynching before I voted him. How on earth do you get that to me starting the run on him?

Not even Olaus believed that HC was a bad lynch and instead put him in the "not cleared" group.

what about jamie? you think he's a good lynch? or jonti maybe? so very quiet!
 
Not even Olaus believed that HC was a bad lynch and instead put him in the "not cleared" group.

I didn't say that he was a good lynch. There was no evidence against him, but there wasn't anything which would have cleared him completely either. Basicly my view about him could be described in D&D terms as "true neutral". And certainly we shouldn't lynch "true neutrals" when there's "chaotic evils" among us.
 
Never said that you did say that.

Well, you claimed that I didn't think that he was a bad lynch.

He wasn't among the most suspicious of us, so lynching him was stupid, but if people don't want to listen, then they can blame only for themselves for their actions.

Trying to blame me for your own idiocy is just annoying.
 
Olaus what do you think about lynching Lem or Jonti?

besids that you said jonti is a good bet....why?

jonti's votes have been against goodies or people who aren't likely baddies. He tried to get Split lynched when jerard was in danger.

Jamie tried to convince people to vote Split, following my hunch you switched to jerard.

unvote jamie

vote jerardo



come on people.....jonti say something you old brit :p

jonti tried to turn the tide:

Hi.

Also, vote Split, it seems to me like Jamie makes some good sense.

But good old Jens turned the balance against jerard.
RL calling, quick vote

Vote jerard
 
what about jamie? you think he's a good lynch? or jonti maybe? so very quiet!

I've been busy. You know, the same reason I haven't played the last few games?

If I was a wolf, I'd have eaten you or Olaus by now.
Olaus's analysis is pure bull - I kept a close vote, and hardly "turned the tide" as he laughably suggests above.

Olaus himself however has been suspicious becase he is always there guiding people by the nose, and his comment about eating Ironhead strikes me as very odd.

So, I suggest that we put some heat on Petrus, who has recieved none so far, while I have already.

Vote Olaus
 
actually Lem already voted Olaus...

Indeed, I want him to have some spotlight though, as he has strangely managed to avoid it thus far.

Jonti ok good to have you around and alive :)

Tanks

how about jamie or Lem? :) Both of them tried to steer the votes away from jared and started the HC-voting....

We can give Jamie a go if you like, he has been another like Olaus who has seemed to lead the village, but hide from the limelight.

I haven't a clue about Meard, he is always an enigma. :p
 
Personally I will vote either Jamie or jonti in this round. Others can do whatever they like, I won't vote Lemeard even to save my own life because I don't believe he is our best bet.

I stick with my accusation agains jonti, because he didn't give any convincing evidence for his own defence, but instead he claims that I'm wolf because I got jerard hanged and because I offer you material for your own analyzing and share my thoughts.

PS: jonti and if you're wondering my comment about idiocy of hunting Ironhead, it was because I5 was among the three most suspicious people. You and jamie were the other two candidates. It's a pity that I actually suspected him bit more than you and there I admit that I made a mistake. This clearly wasn't one of his best performances, because for a while he seemed to be playing for the wolves.
 
unvote Olaus Wolfus, Vote Jamie
 
Personally I will vote either Jamie or jonti in this round. Others can do whatever they like, I won't vote Lemeard even to save my own life because I don't believe he is our best bet.
...

You know you are a villager, unless you are a wolf. If you are lynched, and you are a villager, then we lose. So actually, you would have to save yourself for the good of the village, and hope that Lem or whoever is a wolf. No matter the situation (even if there were a TIE), you would be most helpful to the village by saving yourself. Yes, Hdk, I probably will vote Op, especially because this isn't the first time that he has said stuff like this. This post looks like an attempt to deflect voting towards me and Jonti more than anything sincere.

(Sigh, time to write three essays... :eek:o)