Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

Werewolf LXXV: Werewolf Rules

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Show only dev responses
Woops. That was silly. Hummm. Who's evil? I am pretty sure snoopdogg isn't, but hax wasn't either...
I'll vote Lord Strange as I would rather not create a random bandwagon which I didn't mean to occur
 
Hey. I am onl able to get 30 minutes or so a day on a computer until tomorrow evening. I do not want to lead a bandwagon without even a whiff of evidence.
 
walrus said:
The two no kill nights we've had recently leads me to believe the wolves are being less than active, or are dumb enough to try and hunt someone who was blatantly getting lynched.

Therefore

Vote Jamie550

as he admitted he wasn't paying that much attention

I thought I put my vote in for hax quite early on? Regardless, I play the same way every game, and I haven't been getting involved in the close votes as the evidence up to now has been less than conclusive, and I'd rather throw away my vote in order to keep bandwagons off of people, as they hinder analysis.
Click to expand...
Really? We have managed to kill off one single wolf and you think the no-kills are because of inactives forgetting to send in orders? That would be a whole lot of inactive wolves. And even if not everyone has motivated their votes every time, we haven't had a massive amount of missed votes either. The first no-kill was BTW Ironhead's blessing wearing off so there is only one unexplained no-kill.

And about not wanting to cast a vote that matters except when you are sure there is a baddie to vote for. That works two ways since we can't analyze you either if you do that.

No, this sounds more like another baddie scam to make us waste another day voting for inactives.

vote walrus
 
johho's analysis makes some sense, but at the same time I like that walrus is thinking for himself. I also don't mind lynching those who aren't paying attention right now as we don't have much to go on and it seems this game has about a million scanners.

I will vote the_hdk for now.
 
walrus, you misinterpret what I meant by my Hax comment.

I'm not blaming you for his death, or trying to use his being lynched as any kind of "evidence" against you.

What I'm saying is up until Hax, having looked through all the other votes, you haven't been involved at all in the lynch races. Day 1 you didn't vote for either EURO or ForzaA to get a goodie. Day 2 you didn't vote for either Jester, hebelecan V1.0, jerard, or EURO. Day 3 you didn't vote for enkhuush, or joebthegreat. Day 5 you didn't vote for THE_SPLIT or EUROO7.

Hell on Day 4 you didn't even vote for jonti-h in the bandwagon!

Your consistant throwaway votes means I can't analyze anything you've done. Given that you've been somewhat active here (although you only picked up on activity once called out for it by Ironhead) I find it odd that I can't find any information on you.

And the way you're playing? That's the exact way jonti played up until the bandwagon.

And we really don't have an "inactive" group of people remaining, not enough for an entire pack to go without even sending in a hunt order.

The only one I see looking through my notes is muttoneer V2.0. He subbed for vLN who wasn't doing anything and then proceeded to miss his first vote. He's gone on to avoid every major vote as well. muttoneer V2.0 is your inactive lynch if you really want to go after inactivity.

I don't really mind who we decide get's lynched, at this point there are a lot of possibilities and we just need to gather information, but I do hope walrus is at least run up there close to him in the lynch race.
 
I don't like Lord Strange voting for himself, but I equally don't want a bandwagon, and if I place my vote on LS, it will be harder for other people to be candidates. Therefore, I

Vote walrus

Now it's closer, which leads to better analysis later, instead of runaway bandwagons.



Lord Strange -4- LS, Jamie, hdk, jerard
hdk -3- ForzaA, marty, snoopdogg
walrus -3- joeb, johho, Euro
Jamie - walrus
 
In the interest of self preservation, and because no-one seems to believe me

Unvote Jamie
Vote Lord Strange
 
walrus said:
In the interest of self preservation, and because no-one seems to believe me

Unvote Jamie
Vote Lord Strange
Click to expand...
Believe what, jim?
 
Ironhead 5 said:
Ironhead 5's List o' Suspicion:

snoopdogg: way too cavalier about the village getting schwacked in the early running here. This is supposed to be a fun game, but it feels almost like he is flaunting his evilness. Either that, or he is innocent and wants to rub an "I told you so" in our face for his "baddie tell" from the Lite game.

walrus: It is Day 4. The "random vote" and "I am too busy to do analysis" excuses are wearing thin. Does he not care, or is he trying to act nonchalant so as to appear inconspicuous?

Ciryandor: Keeps PMing me. How do I know he is good? Alternately, how does he know I am good? He seems like a baddie trying to establish rapport.

List o' People We Should Keep Alive For Now:
EUROO7: Whatever this "goody" is that he got on Day 1, it may actually be good. Let's not lynch him until (a) a scanner indicts him via a JL spokesman; (b) plus, he is a potential target for wolves, which keeps them from hunting the rest of us.
marty99: After Nautilu was lynched and revealed to have a few traits, marty99 made a few comments about how "everyone" must be loaded up on traits. He who accuses the whole world, indicts only himself. Marty99 must be loaded up on traits, and so -- like EUROO7 -- he must be kept alive until scanned or until eaten.
Ironhead 5: Because of his intrinsic awesomeness.

VOTE WALRUS
Click to expand...
La La La La La...


Wait, did LS just leave without taking his vote off himself?, that is truely a higher-class of stupidity than most dare to dream of
 
I think that running up LS just for voting for himself is a weak reason.


Creating a TIE! with no proof is a bad idea, so i will VOTE THE_HDK!

Keeping it close should give us some info to analyze if one of the people that are in the running is a baddie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back