-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Thanks for helping us to lynch Lord Strange
Your cooperation is really appreciated
And of course Skarion deserves our thanks too
Each smiley is like a dagger.Thanks for helping us to lynch Lord Strange
Your cooperation is really appreciated
And of course Skarion deserves our thanks too
Okay, I screwed up by PMing snoop when I should have PMed EURO to stop spooking me from trying to be active and not look like I was going under the radar. Did AVN think I was hiding being something by being so vocal on the first day, and tried to spook me out? If he did, then he succeeded beautifully. o
If I had been online near the deadline, I'd be posting something along the lines of, "check out snoop if I get hunted"; but I didn't see that Lemmy had it at a 5am deadline here. :wacko:
oIf I had been online near the deadline, I'd be posting something along the lines of, "check out snoop if I get hunted"; but I didn't see that Lemmy had it at a 5am deadline here. :wacko:
Indeed, the killing of vets and active players shuts the game down. Just look at the last day, it was bloody quiet. Would more active players were alive, it would have had much more discussion, much more votes, and much harder for the wolves to stay hidden. It's not only if you win, but also how, which I also said as Rysz I. There are players who only count a win if it is against a worthy village. TT would only kill AOK if there was no other choice from a tactical point of view, not just on the first night because he would want to win.
And ofcourse you may now and then kill the vets. But not kill most of the vets early on in the game. That is just too obvious and corwardice.
And the killing of jonti was NOT my only point towards you, in fact, it was just the very last sentence in a larger point. It helped to support my argument, but it wasn't my main point. My main point was what you were saying. Your discussion which was, as far as I was concerned, not helpful to the village. That's why I wanted to lynch you. But you didn't react on that, you just jumped on the jonti-argument, as you said you would (see Lem's post with your PM). So if you try to discredit your attackers by that argument, don't go whining now that that was all that I attacked you about. No, you made it so that that became the main argument-in-discussion.
And ofcourse you may now and then kill the vets. But not kill most of the vets early on in the game. That is just too obvious and corwardice.
And the killing of jonti was NOT my only point towards you, in fact, it was just the very last sentence in a larger point. It helped to support my argument, but it wasn't my main point. My main point was what you were saying. Your discussion which was, as far as I was concerned, not helpful to the village. That's why I wanted to lynch you. But you didn't react on that, you just jumped on the jonti-argument, as you said you would (see Lem's post with your PM). So if you try to discredit your attackers by that argument, don't go whining now that that was all that I attacked you about. No, you made it so that that became the main argument-in-discussion.
Thanks for helping us to lynch Lord Strange
Your cooperation is really appreciated
And of course Skarion deserves our thanks too
Meh, guess being able to only make analysis and being online 20 minutes every day when gf is in the shower and putting on her make-up isn't the best idea when playing Werewolf.
Oh well, gg, even if the village was an completely inactive bunch of people.
Oh well, gg, even if the village was an completely inactive bunch of people.
You should have asked Punkbob, snoopdogg, AVN and the other dood if they were wolfes. Then the game would have been sorted.Meh, guess being able to only make analysis and being online 20 minutes every day when gf is in the shower and putting on her make-up isn't the best idea when playing Werewolf.
Oh well, gg, even if the village was an completely inactive bunch of people.
As for the whole debate on hunting vets, I believe that recently they have lived longer than average than the rest of the players, and that it is unfair on the other players how they never usually get killed early, but still, we shouldn't have deliberately hunted them, two wrongs don't make a right
I have checked back, and you are right. It was snoop.
You were just the one doing all the defending. So you should have been lynched too because the only way anyone could be defending such a cheat was if they were both wolves.
I have checked back, and you are right. It was snoop.
You were just the one doing all the defending. So you should have been lynched too because the only way anyone could be defending such a cheat was if they were both wolves.
My 'cheat' was minor compared to a lot of the ghost commentary itt. Besides, I copped to it immediately anyway.
That a ghost points out that a player deleted one of his votes is not breaking the rules. I rather expect the ghosts to point stuff like that out since removing votes isn't in the spirit of the game. At all.
that particular post isn't what i was referring to. At all. Regardless I'll let it drop, and I won't be deleting snipe-fails in the future.
What kind of mistake? A vote count mistake, or, say, killing the wrong person in the update mistake?
If it is a vote count mistake, no, if it is some other "mistake" that may not actually be a mistake, yes.
no.
only if they impact player actions, i.e. suggest actionable strategies, giving away information they have about the game (even if they said it before), or telling other players how to vote/act.
saying "The GM messed up with a rule," isn't one of those things.
at least, that's my understanding of the game.
only if they impact player actions, i.e. suggest actionable strategies, giving away information they have about the game (even if they said it before), or telling other players how to vote/act.
saying "The GM messed up with a rule," isn't one of those things.
at least, that's my understanding of the game.
Saying a GM messed up with a rule possibly could be. They should PM the GM about such matters and not go public with it. There may be a set of cicumstances where the GM didn't actually mess up the rules, and if the ghost goes public with it, the GM will be forced to explain it and can alter the outcome of the game.
I meant a mistake like your having Lord Strange listed as dead for two days on page 1. I saw that before the players did, and considered registering to point it out, but decided against it.