• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Final Count



Syber -5- Jester, Rysz, Split, GenHan, Nau
Split -5- AVN, marty, Yakman, Lemeard, Syber
Yakman -1- jonti
GenHan -1- hdk
marty -1- Dravar
Rysz -1- Slinky
nau -1- ls
AVN -1- Xeno​



 
With one dead Bruce Willis, the other Bruce Willis must find the Bruce Willis impersonator!

First they choose four to die, then three, then two, and finally one. It seems as though one Bruce Willis with a tendency to yippie ki yay is the one destined to be beaten by the other Bruce Willis. But at the last second, Bruce Willis says:

"Hey, why only one at a time? Let's kill two of them!"

The Bruce Willis cheered as they beat the two Bruce Willis to pulp.

When all was done and done, they noticed that the yippie ki yay Bruce was just another Bruce Willis, while the other had a more sinistre look about him that made them all shiver in their pants.

They had managed to kill a possessed Bruce Willis, who was in fact a dead werewolf. Now truly dead, though...

8vyd6g.jpg


In the night, Cole Sear once again saw as, now three, dead werewolves killed a Bruce Willis. This time, it was Bruce Willis.
Syber the villager is lynched.
THE_SPLIT the werewolf is lynched.
Jester180 the villager is hunted.
 
Then in the morning, Bruce "The Rysz" Willis ran out of the building.

In to replace him, Bruce Willis.*​

*Teep
 
Hmmm...
I am going to...
VOTE Nautilu
He tried to stop the tie from happening, so I shall start the day with a vote on him.
I agree, so far he looks the most suspicious so far, he did break a tie and maybe he just chose wrongly, but he is definitely a good candidate

Vote Lord Strange His method is far too easy to manipulate to his advantage , making throwaways whenever there is plenty of info to make an informed vote with should not be excused for any player under any conditions
From this point on anyone who does so should be lynched
 
Well, I'll have to look through the thread, but in case I forget to vote later, I:

Vote Nautilu.

It seems he was trying to prevent the lynching of a packmate by putting splits feellow tieee ahead.
 
I agree, so far he looks the most suspicious so far, he did break a tie and maybe he just chose wrongly, but he is definitely a good candidate

Vote Lord Strange His method is far too easy to manipulate to his advantage , making throwaways whenever there is plenty of info to make an informed vote with should not be excused for any player under any conditions
From this point on anyone who does so should be lynched

I endorse this message. Let's lynch those who don't say much - after all, an active village is one the wolves can less easily manipulate.

Vote Lord Strange
 
vote GeneralHannibal

490366022_b4bc5e4bf0.jpg
 

Also it seems everyone but me can make a TIE and not get shouted at for it :mad:

What the hell you complaining about now?:rofl:
 
Well, after having read through, I havnt found a better target than nautilu. I will keep my vote on him until he gives his reasons for his actions or a better possibility emerges.

@Yakman: Why General Hannibal?
 
Well, after having read through, I havnt found a better target than nautilu. I will keep my vote on him until he gives his reasons for his actions or a better possibility emerges.

@Yakman: Why General Hannibal?

I suspect that the reasoning behind voting Hannibal is that he was clearly online and in a position to make the snipe and create a tie and did not. So, left to him Split would have been spared yesterday.

Additionally, he immediately came out saying that he was in support of the tie I created when I very well could have accidentally killed 2 villagers. If he was a wolf though he would immediately know that the tie killed a wolf so he might have celebrated the tie as an alibi for later, "why would I celebrate a tie that killed a packmate?"

I strongly suspect that General Hannibal and/or Nautilu are wolves at this point though.
 
XenomorphII said:
I suspect that the reasoning behind voting Hannibal is that he was clearly online and in a position to make the snipe and create a tie and did not. So, left to him Split would have been spared yesterday.

Additionally, he immediately came out saying that he was in support of the tie I created when I very well could have accidentally killed 2 villagers. If he was a wolf though he would immediately know that the tie killed a wolf so he might have celebrated the tie as an alibi for later, "why would I celebrate a tie that killed a packmate?"

I strongly suspect that General Hannibal and/or Nautilu are wolves at this point though.
Ok, hadnt thought of that, I always find it suspicious when someone votes someone without a reason, especially one who was close to being lynched yesterday. Thanks for that ill have to mul it over.
 
I suspect that the reasoning behind voting Hannibal is that he was clearly online and in a position to make the snipe and create a tie and did not. So, left to him Split would have been spared yesterday.

Additionally, he immediately came out saying that he was in support of the tie I created when I very well could have accidentally killed 2 villagers. If he was a wolf though he would immediately know that the tie killed a wolf so he might have celebrated the tie as an alibi for later, "why would I celebrate a tie that killed a packmate?"

I strongly suspect that General Hannibal and/or Nautilu are wolves at this point though.

Not really... I play too conservatively (also in poker, but that's a different issue) to make a snipe and tie the game up, especially on the first day. But, I also just wanted a tie to happen. So, this way I got the best of both worlds - there was a tie, which is always fun, but I didn't have to risk anything to see it happen. Which turns out to have been wrong, as I look more suspicious now that if I'd supported the tie. But I did what any villager with a heightened sense of self-preservation and an appreciation of ties would have done. Call that wolfish if you want.