Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

WW Forum Management Poll

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Which is Best for the forum?

  • 1 WW Game, 1 WW liteGame and 1 other

    Votes: 5 11,4%

  • 1 WW game, 2 WWlite Games, and 1 other

    Votes: 5 11,4%

  • 1 WW game, 1 WWlite games and 2 others

    Votes: 14 31,8%

  • 1 WW game, 2 WWlite games and 2 others

    Votes: 16 36,4%

  • 2 WW game, 2 WWlite games and 2 others

    Votes: 0 0,0%

  • Unlimited games

    Votes: 4 9,1%
  • Total voters
    44
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't see any option for invading baade...
 
I think we best limit ourselves to one big game at a time; it is hard enough to have subs for one big game, let alone have players and subs for two big games that are running concurrently.
Lately, there's been talk about running two Lites simultaneously, and I think it's something we could try. Lite tends to fill up pretty quickly, and if we can get ~35 players for a big game we should have enough for two Lites.
Regarding other games, I don't see why there should be any limit. BSG concerns only a handful of people (and a couple of Cylons!) at a time. People who played Dark Cult back in the days were mostly the same people who played/play Werewolf. I think it's logical that these games are placed here.
 
I agree with Jopi on only one big game at a time. Two big games that are barely big are not better than one properly filled big game.

As for simultaneous lites, I still have my doubts. Though if it's based somehow on Jacob's model, I suppose it could work.
 
i think that more than one full BIG game is overkill, one lite game is enought, but we also need space for BSG and one more game to try out, like DarK Cult, or something entirely different.

more is clutter.
 
For some reason, I cannot edit polls in this forum.... :mad:

So anyone who wants to Invade Baade, or select "Other" please jot down your ideas here.
 
1 big game max but totally flexible on others. I would say more like 1.75 lite games so they are forced to be staggered slightly to try and make sure the games are not starting at the same time and other games so long as they are smaller players numbers I see no problems with.
 
No limit would be the best for this sub-forum and the Forum Gaming Community as a whole. Let us police ourselves and let supply and demand dictate the number of games that go on at any time. The forum owners and admins obviously have a say in the matter though, which makes it hard to discuss without knowing their feelings about the topic, and this sub-forum as a whole.

So I guess my final answer is to let us do anything we want that won't get this sub-forum closed down.
 
1,1,2 sounds like perhaps the best option so there are 2 locked for WW and 2 that can be used for WW but other games also so long as 1 big is the max there. A "medium" WW might be interesting actually now that someone mentions it...:D
 
We should have 1 WW and 2 Lites, stacked 2-3 days apart from each other, and with the agreement that if someone is currently alive in a Lite, they shouldn't sign up for the second one. We don't want the same people to be signing up over and over again.
 
Raczynski said:
I would say: one big WW, one lite WW, one BSG, and finally an additional spot for extra lite, Dark Cult, etc.
Click to expand...

If you wanted to go this route, you should just do 2 others. The BSG game is a board game so someone has to actually own it to GM and AFAIK Artell is the only one that has the game and is willing to GM. A dedicated BSG slot could very well end up wasted the majority of the time.
 
I'd say 1 full, two lites (max) and 2 others - BSG and DC.

Two lites as a maximum, because sometimes the game becomes almost a dead one and it is nice to get the new one underway.
This would be as a maximum only, not intended ot always run 2 lites together.

I suppose the same could be said for full to be honest.
 
sbr said:
If you wanted to go this route, you should just do 2 others. The BSG game is a board game so someone has to actually own it to GM and AFAIK Artell is the only one that has the game and is willing to GM. A dedicated BSG slot could very well end up wasted the majority of the time.
Click to expand...
This is very important, it remains possible a 2nd host is found, I know we had a game on languish, but unlikely to have a 2nd host and artell will want a break occasionally.;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back