I do not metagame. (or at least I havn't done so in a very long time (more than a year) and I want to keep it that way)
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I do not metagame. (or at least I havn't done so in a very long time (more than a year) and I want to keep it that way)
Let it be noted I have no need for any sort of revenge against AOK. We didn't act against each other in game, we just had a somewhat stiff debriefing. I was looking forward to the rhetorical rivalry, and thus I am unpleased he fell too early and too young.
I am not familiar with his past record in this game that have brought animosity against him, thus I will do with what I'm given. I have to make a vote so I'll try and use some logic in it, even though I know the chances to actually catch a baddie are slim.
I have to make my choice between you or Trespoe. I'm still ensure. i might change.
I am not familiar with his past record in this game that have brought animosity against him, thus I will do with what I'm given. I have to make a vote so I'll try and use some logic in it, even though I know the chances to actually catch a baddie are slim.
I have to make my choice between you or Trespoe. I'm still ensure. i might change.
My second big game I got lynched for cheering that we finally killed a wolf. I was a villager and oblivious to these "baddie tells". It was like day 5 or something and things were starting to look ridiculously bad. So I say "FINALLY! Something to use for analysis!" or something like that.
Immediately I got bandwagoned, and nobody even bothered to check the people who were responsible for the bandwagon. They simply said "he deserved it for such an obvious baddie tell".
That was years ago and I'm pretty sure you were in that game (you might have died before it happened)... I'll have to go back and check...
(I don't like it as a "baddie tell", it's not solid analysis and it seems to catch people who are unaware of it rather than any actual baddies).
But yeah, it's been around as a classic baddie tell for ages.
---
randakar said:
That is annoying.
Seriously, vote on a bandwagon before anyone else has gotten a vote? And immediately being reactionary against anyone who votes him? It's not like I have much to go on on day 1. It's likely he really is a villager being needlessly suspicious. Such is life. For now, my vote remains.
Jackpot15 said:
And the runner up, for "needlessly acts suspicious" goes to!
---
Adamus said:
What else can I say? While I wouldn't want AOK dead, I'm also aware of how it would "obviously not be joeb". Keep that in mind.
And keep that in mind for other people too.
Why is that?
Are you talking about me now, or about Boris?
I'd like a count. When I wrote that bit of that (long) post I wasn't fully caught up yet, and Boris seems to be getting a lot of votes.
Who are you voting again?
And the runner up, for "needlessly acts suspicious" goes to!
He looks like a decent suspect, doesn't he?
I wouldn't want to lynch someone new this early, but it -is- tempting.
magenta = no longer voting for this person
Boris ze Spider:3 (joebthegreat, Jackpot15, randakar)
Lurken: 3 (the_hdk, Eternaly_Lost, Jolt)
Adamus: 2 (J. Passepartout, jacob-Lundgren, Boris ze Spider)
Rysz: 1 (jacob-Lundgren)
randakar: 1 (Sedracus)
walrus: 1 (Lurken)
drxav: 1 (Orange Yoshi)
Orange Yoshi: 1 (walrus)
Sedracus: 1 (Ciryandor)
jonti-h: 1 (k-59)
the_hdk: 1 (drxav)
Kehaar: 0 (drxav)
Feel free to give me the smack down if this is wrong somewhere...
hm, that looks a lot closer than I thought it would look.
Why are people voting Lurken? The case laid out by the_hdk was inane, EL following up looks even less logical, and I didn't even notice Jolt's vote.
(edit: It's not that far away. And the reason? Inane ..)
I have a strong feeling that Lurken is a goodie. Especially after the conversations I had with him by PM yesterday. Don't vote him.
edit: Let me show the PM's, since this should have been public anyway.
Why are people voting Lurken? The case laid out by the_hdk was inane, EL following up looks even less logical, and I didn't even notice Jolt's vote.
(edit: It's not that far away. And the reason? Inane ..)
I have a strong feeling that Lurken is a goodie. Especially after the conversations I had with him by PM yesterday. Don't vote him.
edit: Let me show the PM's, since this should have been public anyway.
Lurken said:Lurken said:randakar said:Lurken said:randakar said:Heya Lurken.
Lurken said:
That would fit the religions theme quite nicely.
Lurken said:
Wait, you knew who were members of -both- packs? Were you the PM mistake Reis made?
I doubt the GM would so silly as to keep the packs largely the same in terms of composition.
How many people did he put in those packs?
Lurken said:
What is stopping you from saying this in the thread? Don't want to stand out?
I can convey this information to the thread for you if you want.
Aye, I were a member of two packs. Both of them had 3 wolves and 1 cultist.
And I PMed you mostly because you asked for information. Which I had.
I would have been fine with you just telling people that publicly. ;-)
Do you know what the hunting pattern was?
No. Both packs were told to have a valid hunting order for all days. So that is a total unknown.
All right, I'll spill the beans later today. Might aswell.
Just in case something bad happens to me.
This data may no longer be accurate, but it is data.
Schismatics
Lurken : Wolf
drxav : Guardian Angel Wolf
J. Passepartout : Wolf
Paendrag : Cultist
Infidels
Walrus : Wolf
Lord Strange : Wolf
k-59 : Hunter Wolf
Lurken : Cultist
That was the roles I recieved from GM. The only notable discrepency is J.Pass. His claim of GA wolf is a bit wonky when compared to this data. However, it could have been one more mix-up.
Last edited:
Well...the cats out of the box now =P
And yes, I revisited HDKs vote against me and ELs...darn they were shady reasons.
And yes, I revisited HDKs vote against me and ELs...darn they were shady reasons.
I really should have made a rule stating that people who claim godhood would be smited with a bolt of lightning. But God can be merciful, I suppose.
That unfortunately is a reference back to me... I guess.
Unvote Cardinal Ximenez
Vote the poor soul who is left no choice but to join
Let us give him Eternally_Lost errr I mean Eternal Rest
Though in WH40K, the God-Emperor is yet a god. A very very powerful A++++ psyker, yes, but not a god...yet.
Allow me for a quick clarification on one aspect of the rules.
Apprentices that have acquired a new role cannot claim other apprentices.
Apprentices that have acquired a new role cannot claim other apprentices.
It's day 1, what kind of reasons for votes do you expect?
If the setup is the same as round 1 of role distribution we are looking at 50% baddies and they will only be interested in lynching someone from not their pack so lot of people have no reason to put a lot of effort into finding baddies. OTOH odds are fairly good any random dude we pick for lynch is a baddie.
If you think Lurken is a goodie then I'll vote whoever he votes (is that a good enough reason for a vote for ya?)
vote walrus
Not great ones, but a bandwagon made entirely out of horse poo reasons? Tsk.
True. This is also why I am wondering if we should aim for a tie.
That's better than no reason at all
And yeah, I believe him to be a goodie based on behaviour. I may very well be wrong, but that is enough reason for me to ask people to put their votes elsewhere.
Joeb may also have a point about boris, btw, so let's see what your walrus vote does.
Unvote Boris
Vote Walrus
Vote EUROO7
because I got a headache and couldn't access the forums from work and I assume EUROO7 is the cause for both.
because I got a headache and couldn't access the forums from work and I assume EUROO7 is the cause for both.
4 packs...
In two of them we know they were told to have valid hunting orders for every day...
How often have you guys played around with random number generated nightly hunts?
All 4 packs have a hunt order... 25% chance says pack 1 hunts that night, 25% chance says pack 2 hunts that night, 25% chance says pack 3 hunts that night, 25% chance says pack 4 hunts that night. Or any other variation on this.
Have any GMs besides EURO ever played with something like this?
In two of them we know they were told to have valid hunting orders for every day...
How often have you guys played around with random number generated nightly hunts?
All 4 packs have a hunt order... 25% chance says pack 1 hunts that night, 25% chance says pack 2 hunts that night, 25% chance says pack 3 hunts that night, 25% chance says pack 4 hunts that night. Or any other variation on this.
Have any GMs besides EURO ever played with something like this?
Yeeees, I've been thinking about that too...
I think some GM had a fixed hunt pattern ABCCBA or something only he didn't want the pack to know how many pack there were and so he told all pack to send in orders every day. There was also some GM that used time stamp on hunt orders to decide which pack hunted (or was that only something that was discussed?)
There is a fault: I have never before done something which used the list order.
Now, there is Boris up there: He is is still quite a new player, and I don't want him dead yet.
Lurken is just returned from a long break. He deserves to play just a bit longer than 1 day.
Vote walrus
To keep the other 2 alive.