no no i have learnt over many games with randakar:
Good= Loads of posts and analysis
Bad= non active, one liner posts
Its only until you bring him up on it he then goes back to faking his major long posts but really he is doomed from the start and a lynching will be on the cards.
That actually is a bit of a mischaracterisation. I -do- tend to analyze a lot as a baddie, too. And in fact I have won my fair share of games as a baddie, too. So 'doomed from the start'? Hardly ;-)
That being said, it -is- hard for me to get fully engaged with games when I am a wolf. Now that it is hard for me to get fully engaged with games -regardless- of my status (real life obligations tend to do that) and on top of that a lot of other people are quite capable of saying what I want to be said when I'm a villager I expect the distinction to get quite a bit less clear
As an example all you need to look at is the last lite game - I didn't really analyse a ton there, did I?