• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Why didnt Walrus get one of his attackers?
 
I guess this proves the authenticity of najs/johho's lists (or wherever they came from, enkhuush?)

Vote Eternaly_Lost
 
If the village had any brains they'd take out a commie next.
 
I believe that is very, very close to breaking the ghost rules.

he said brains..... is this zombie rules?
 
I believe that is very, very close to breaking the ghost rules.

I agree. Although technically, reis has his own unique ghost rules. He hasn't prevented ghosts bringing up non-secret information, and he has specifically allowed ghosts to make vote counts of the current day. I disagree with both of these changes.

Spectators and Ghosts ("dead" players) may haunt, taunt and flaunt. They may not reveal any secret/inside information nor may they do voting records except for the current day. Anyone caught doing it risk being banned from later Werewolf games. When making a ghost/spectator comment, please use a non-white colour (and keep off the GM colour, lightgreen).

So I'm free to tell people that a vote count is wrong, that their interpretation of the rules is wrong, or that they've forgotten some piece of analysis. In fact, I could do my own analysis if it used only public information.

Which is all a little silly.
 
I agree. Although technically, reis has his own unique ghost rules. He hasn't prevented ghosts bringing up non-secret information, and he has specifically allowed ghosts to make vote counts of the current day. I disagree with both of these changes.



So I'm free to tell people that a vote count is wrong, that their interpretation of the rules is wrong, or that they've forgotten some piece of analysis. In fact, I could do my own analysis iif it used only public information.

Which is all a little silly.

Except for the fact that I did not change anything. I believe that the players would use good sense when determining what should not be posted, and thus I didn't give much attention to the ghost rules which I've transcribed.

I do agree that it is silly though, and will thus ask everyone to refrain from doing so.
 

Except for the fact that I did not change anything. I believe that the players would use good sense when determining what should not be posted, and thus I didn't give much attention to the ghost rules which I've transcribed.

I do agree that it is silly though, and will thus ask everyone to refrain from doing so.

It may be that everyone has just assumed the rules are the same here as in Lite, and didn't bother to check:

§4A. - Spectators and ghosts may comment, but never suggest a course of action, reveal any new information, including vote counts. Preferably spectators will comment only in a manner tangential to the actual game.
§4B. - When doing ghost/spectator commentary, please use a non-white colour.

Much more reasonable. I only spotted the flaws in the Big rules when I went to quote them in support of Najs, and found there was nothing to support him with.

If you copy-pasted that part of the Big rules, I'd be interested to see how long they've been in use.
 
Snoop has a vote on Randakar.

I thought that vote was before the previous update...but then again, it was after the previous deadline...

So...GM rules!

:D

Vote AVN
 
Unvote AVN
Vote Eternally_Lost
 
Vote TheExecuter.
Confirmed wolf.

Doubtful at best.

TheExecuter was a hunter... he killed Najs dead. Since this is a very lite in traits game, he probably isn't a wolf.

I actually just wanted to say he killed him dead, I like the sound of that phrase.
 
VOTE ETERNALY_LOST

I still want the sorc, AVN, to die, but likely wolves are best right now.
 
@GM

Can I get my scan result please ?
Not here, but just by PM, as almost all GM's do directly after posting their update.
Thanks.

(and this is not the first time I have to remind you to send me my scan result).