Nautilu is very quiet and voted snoopdogg after he became a contender, but before he was in the lead.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
randakar said:
There's still time to fix that. If you don't hunt me, that is. Incoherence is a weapon to be used sparingly, though.
Yes, they will be taken off the suspect list alright... when their name shows up green in the update.
About the warning, well, it seems voting wasn't the only thing I forgot. I reckon that I had the vote and the warning typed out, and then didn't submit post, that would explain it.
Now, can I get some opinions on my suspect list? I didn't develop the cases there not only due to lack of time to do it properly right now, but also to encourage independent thinking amongst the villagers. It is neither fair nor advisable that the village surrenders thinking to two or three guys (you should surrender it to me alone, obviously).
Run a case against yourself, and see what you can get. It's an useful exercise, really, which I can recommend to everyone.
I did not say you killed him, just that you know he is dead.
If I didn't kill him, I am not a wolf, smart guy.
Well, that's a better case than the one you came up with earlier ;-)
So yeah, he's not a bad suspect.
Not posting at all needs to be an instant two strikes though. It just won't do to have you not even talking, as well as voting.
Incoherent ranting is a possible weapon?
I must admit, I have seen a lot of interesting tactics employed, but that one sounds new ..
Actually, "when they show us their PM conversations with Kiwi" is more likely.
You do have a point - trusting their word without evidence would not be wise. But I thought that that bit was obvious
Why do you think Kiwi was hunted, btw? Capt. Kiwi himself seems to think he was rather obvious, but I don't see it. Do you?
.. right.
Not yet. That requires me to go back and reread bits of the game.
Looking at the vote counts:
For King the case is rather clear-cut.
the_hdk is one of the people voting snoopdogg. But he also voted King on day 1, so them being packmates sounds unlikely.
Najs .. he voted a throwaway yesterday, and rendap on day 1.
Trespoe - rendap on day 1, you yesterday. Also a throwaway of sorts, perhaps. But if you're a wolf, trespoe may not be.
EL - Well, we would get a lot of information by lynching him, but I'm on the fence. If he's a wolf he's had a pretty high profile so far, and I don't quite see the case against him other than "he got saved".
To be honest, I'm thinking the people voting EL yesterday are more likely to be wolves than people voting Snoop. EL got run up *fast*. The counterwagon on snoop looked more like a village reaction than anything else. Capt. Kiwi's case against snoop made sense, and with 5 votes ahead of everyone else running up someone with a case against him seemed logical. In hindsight, perhaps a little *too* logical. The point is, if EL is a wolf his pack mates probably alibi'd on him when that wagon started going, if he's not it still makes sense for the wolves to vote him.
If I didn't kill him, I am not a wolf, smart guy.
You need not be the person who send in that order, you know.
Hunts have been changed without the entire pack knowing before.
If I didn't kill him, I am not a wolf, smart guy.
Nope. Your packmates did!
The fast bandwagon on EL could be a wolf reaction... or it could just be sheep jumping on a presented target. I'm leaning towards the latter, but it could always be that four of those five EL voters are wolves.
So, who likes the new, semi-active Tai, and who prefers the old, inactive, hide-in-a-corner Tai?
So, who likes the new, semi-active Tai, and who prefers the old, inactive, hide-in-a-corner Tai?
What? How was that even relevant to my question? You place my name on some sort of "suspect list" and ask people for comments on it. I ask why I am on it and you respond like this? Are you trying to dodge my question or haven't you gotten your morning coffee yet?
Stop spouting nonsense.
Vote reis
The EUROO : DELIVERS.
The kiwoo : flightless.
The Randoo : workative.
THe Reisoo : never dissapoint.
Not enough of THIS here. GUISE.
[video=youtube;32FB-gYr49Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32FB-gYr49Y[/video]
MYAA!!
Where the heck did "Near-French" go?
Darnit. This game has way too many good suspects.
That includes you, by the way.
If that is the case - who did the presenting?
I like him. I'd like to see more of him, actually.
@DrXav - you can't resist, can you?
The case was feeble and I didn't expect anybody to grab hold of it, if I were a wolf, why would I expose my pack so easily?
@DrXav - you can't resist, can you?
should I? Tell me, should I? GIVE MEH AN ANSWERE SHOULD AAAAIIIII??????
I feel like the right thing as a matter of precedent would have been to sub you, to prevent not voting being used tactically. But I didn't want to be a hardass because it seemed like an honest mistake; subbing you wasn't necessary on the basis of inactivity because you were obviously about, and subbing you wouldn't fix the absent vote, but in fact make analysis harder since then the slot would suddenly change personality. So I ask everyone to play nice and studiously avoid missing votes - even placeholders are better than nothing.
@ Kiwi
I hope that everyone enjoys the way I RP their characters/deaths... poor Seen got a bit gipped though.
Of course you should. Did I ever say you shouldn't?
You're not answering my question .. it was you, wasn't it?
MWwwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAhhhhhhHHHHhhhh
TOO MuCH COOFFEE.
[video=youtube;_g7VZW9dFK4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g7VZW9dFK4[/video]
TOO MuCH COOFFEE.
[video=youtube;_g7VZW9dFK4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g7VZW9dFK4[/video]
