I think you'd have great result from thatIn that case, we've gotten it right anyway. Damn I hate all those conflicting sources. Maybe I should just call the Russian navy and ask them?![]()
I think you'd have great result from thatIn that case, we've gotten it right anyway. Damn I hate all those conflicting sources. Maybe I should just call the Russian navy and ask them?![]()
For which system?If you have them (and it isn't treason to give them out!) a set of specs would be nice.
![]()
Now, tell me, how much do you know about our UCAV programs? And there are multiple of those, with billions of us dollars in budgets and development of heavy/medium/light unnamed aircraft. And no, SKAT is not one of those - the only reason it was shown was b/c its developer is dying and the program is pretty much dead.Anyway, the problem is not whether or not Russian bombers will carrying the Kh-101, but the lack of exact specifications for the missile. In the case of the sizzler and onyx, there is absolutely no information ATM that suggests any bomber will carry this weapons.
And what do you want to know? This is Kh22 with new seaker and changes to the propulsion, with increase in range.Kh-32
Then I want to know maximum range, speed, and how the seeker was changed.And what do you want to know? This is Kh22 with new seaker and changes
to the propulsion, with increase in range.