• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Whoever taught you maths should have been sacked ages ago.

Usually when I vote an overly aggresive person just for the sake of my sanity it doens't end well. The Yakwagon seems to have lost momentum. Hmm, I think I'll still keep my vote on him.
I see, so you are not voting Xarkan the baddie. Might I ask why?
 
Hmmm....
 
vote ryzs

He might be a wolf.
 
unvote XARKAN
VOTE RYSZ


tumblr_m5hk31gQgU1rnff72.gif
 
UNVOTE RYSZ
VOTE XARKAN


i'm having trouble today.
 
After my death, and after you lynch Xarkan, please go back to my posts. People why tried to avoid answering my question need to be investigated fully. I should be able to prepare a full list of baddies before my untimely demise
 
After my death, and after you lynch Xarkan, please go back to my posts. People why tried to avoid answering my question need to be investigated fully. I should be able to prepare a full list of baddies before my untimely demise
i am firmly convinced that you are not not not evil. one or two of those nots might have to be removed.
 
with the no-hunts it is the only compelling argument.

here's a thought:

Night 2 - Xarkan was hunted by one pack after outing EUROO7. RANDAKAR saved him
Night 3 - He was hunted the next night turned... and told his new buddies that Randakar was the doc...

Wouldn't work with alternating hunt days, but the GM could have set up an alternative system - I've done so in the past. Could also be one big pack, but I doubt it.

Or Randy just randomly reached out to XARKAN.
 
with the no-hunts it is the only compelling argument.

here's a thought:

Night 2 - Xarkan was hunted by one pack after outing EUROO7. RANDAKAR saved him
Night 3 - He was hunted the next night turned... and told his new buddies that Randakar was the doc...

Wouldn't work with alternating hunt days, but the GM could have set up an alternative system - I've done so in the past. Could also be one big pack, but I doubt it.

Or Randy just randomly reached out to XARKAN.
Again again I say to you, Yakman speaketh the truth
 
with the no-hunts it is the only compelling argument.

here's a thought:

Night 2 - Xarkan was hunted by one pack after outing EUROO7. RANDAKAR saved him
Night 3 - He was hunted the next night turned... and told his new buddies that Randakar was the doc...

Wouldn't work with alternating hunt days, but the GM could have set up an alternative system - I've done so in the past. Could also be one big pack, but I doubt it.

Or Randy just randomly reached out to XARKAN.

Expect we are told when a Doc saves someone. It shows up person x is injured and can't vote that day.
If saved, said player may not act the next day

If Randy reached out Xarkan because he was not hunted, he was a fool. If Randy was the GA maybe. But he was the Doctor.
 
Again again I say to you, Yakman speaketh the truth

You should really think about what you are saying here Split. You are starting to convince me that you two are wolfs trying to save each other and not humans that are throwing things around. There is a hole so big in what Yakman said that I am wondering if he is posting well he is drunk or something.
 
hmm... that's a good point.
 
with the no-hunts it is the only compelling argument.

here's a thought:

Night 2 - Xarkan was hunted by one pack after outing EUROO7. RANDAKAR saved him
Night 3 - He was hunted the next night turned... and told his new buddies that Randakar was the doc...

Wouldn't work with alternating hunt days, but the GM could have set up an alternative system - I've done so in the past. Could also be one big pack, but I doubt it.

Or Randy just randomly reached out to XARKAN.

Randakar was the doctor, so I would have been injured and ineligible to vote. If I 'was' the person hunted, maybe the GA saved me? I don't know, I don't believe the GM tells people when they were saved, nor who did the saving. What I do know is that I am not a wolf, nor a breakfast food.
 
EL it is the conclusion that matters not the discussion.
Suppose, we discard what was previously posted and I tell you that you are trying to lynch a SA villager who was scanned by Xarkan yesterday? Or suppose I told you that I am in the contact with a priest who scanned Xarkan? Usually when people stick their neck out so early in the game, as we did it, means something for the villagers. Wolfs tend to stay low early in the game as they are on a numeric disadvantage.
Regardless of the reason as to how I know that Xarkan is a baddie, I do. So you either use that info to lynch a baddie or continue to write off what I am telling you……
 
You should really think about what you are saying here Split. You are starting to convince me that you two are wolfs trying to save each other and not humans that are throwing things around. There is a hole so big in what Yakman said that I am wondering if he is posting well he is drunk or something.

If his location is correct, that means he is drunk quite early in the day.
 
hmmm.... I'm thinking that we should all just agree to bandwagon Rysz.

unvote XARKAN
VOTE RYSZ
 
So Yakman is his usual self and Split is way too defensive. Still, according to vote count Split has a big lead so I am willing to consider alternatives.

unvote Split, vote Mr. G

That under-the-radar vote is certainly worthy of a vote or two.