You're shifting the goalposts, though. An invisible smoke field would be disguised perfectly. It wouldn't cover anything, though 
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You're shifting the goalposts, though. An invisible smoke field would be disguised perfectly. It wouldn't cover anything, though
Do you have a goatee?
You're shifting the goalposts, though. An invisible smoke field would be disguised perfectly. It wouldn't cover anything, though
Yeah, but if you were trying to hide invisible smoke, visible smoke would work. Now, you can't see that which is invisible in the first place-but the visible would hide it anyhow. On the other hand, if you tried to disguise the visible with something invisible, it won't work.
"Third in command" is a trait that any player can have, it doesn't mean that there are three wolves in a pack. For example the leader (1st in command) could be a villager, the 2nd in command a cultist and the 3rd in command a wolf etc.
I never seen him in a Big game before. Doesn't mean we can't lynch him now though.
Ah, I see the flaw in your reasoning.
See, 'Third in command' is not something internal to the pack. Those traits are spread out over all the players.
Typically, you'll find a Leader Villager, then second and third in command in the packs, 4th in command back in the village.
As we can tell from last night's hunt, there is probably a pack B and while pack A got the first hunt, we can assume pack B got the second in command.
UNVOTE JACK
You're getting the newbie benefit of the doubt.
Vote The Split
not voting in a game with this many players is just plain wrong. Should be auto lynched. Ill give the newer players the benefit of a second chance.
not voting in a game with this many players is just plain wrong. Should be auto lynched. Ill give the newer players the benefit of a second chance.
Vote The_Split
Yeeaaaaahh I'm really sorry, I had a very busy weekend and I forgot about this thread. :sad: Here is some more Epic Sax Guy to make up for it!
Yeeaaaaahh I'm really sorry, I had a very busy weekend and I forgot about this thread. :sad: Here is some more Epic Sax Guy to make up for it!
Guys, voting a zombie is nice and all but this is the sort of bandwagon that doesn't give a lot of substance to go on for analysis later on...
Well if you have any better ideas about who we should be lynching we would love to hear them!
Votecount, 3 hours 7 minutes to deadline
SPLIT (5) - Citizen, Adamus, jpr, Valhalla's Call, reis
walrus (4) - ese, Cliges, RepBentley, Jack118
Not voted: Salik, SPLIT, johho, The Super Pope, walrus, Falc
Missed one vote: Salik, SPLIT, Valhalla's Call
In line for autolynching if they miss today's vote: Salik, SPLIT
SPLIT (5) - Citizen, Adamus, jpr, Valhalla's Call, reis
walrus (4) - ese, Cliges, RepBentley, Jack118
Not voted: Salik, SPLIT, johho, The Super Pope, walrus, Falc
Missed one vote: Salik, SPLIT, Valhalla's Call
In line for autolynching if they miss today's vote: Salik, SPLIT
Hardly a runaway bandwagon with walrus in contention now, is it?
@ Superpope : Know something we don't?
By breaking the tie, Citizen saved Split. Also, it seems enough people are voting Split and Walrus, so I figured Citizen wasn't a bad call
Ah but Citizen voted Split in #171 while Split only asked for his sub in #173 and Tamius announcing the possible autolynch in #174. So unless Citizen can see the future, this argument holds no water.
Also
VOTE WALRUS
We need more votecounts so I don't have to rely as much on my memory.
Unvote walrus
Vote Falc
I reckon this gives the most info and I feel a little less bad if SPLIT gets lynched normally.
Vote Falc
I reckon this gives the most info and I feel a little less bad if SPLIT gets lynched normally.