Reject this team. It feels like it's getting through too easily. There's probably a spy on it.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
And you don't think you will find out more by actually accepting this team? And Falc didn't choose me, there was a good half an hour where anyone could have got Falc to open up to them. How did we coordinate exactly? None of us even knew Falc would be playing.
Not that I'll be particularly bothered if this team is rejected, more team proposals can't hurt.
Not that I'll be particularly bothered if this team is rejected, more team proposals can't hurt.
As JPR said, how on earth was I supposed to post my message in such a way that one particular player would post next? Sure, you can try for it, but again, as JPR said, there was half an hour between.
And the reason why I do not vote in public is because I'm quite convinced that, (again) on average, public voting favors the Spies. Spies have a vested interest to reject teams without any Spies in it, or to try and drive the proposal count up. Public voting allows them the luxury of hiding in bandwagons.
I agree on the bandwagoning part, but why does it benefit spies to do more proposals? Unless they rich the dangerous 4-5th proposals, information from both proposals and voting is important for the Resistance.
In all honesty there's probably a spy or two already on this mission anyway. Just pass it to see what happens. Even if there is, it is most unlikely that they would even fail it anyway.
Here's the current vote:
Approve: RepBentley, marty99, jpr123, tamius23, Cymsdale
Reject: Xarkan, citizen1oo1
Approve: RepBentley, marty99, jpr123, tamius23, Cymsdale
Reject: Xarkan, citizen1oo1
Well, I'm still standing on my point, and as I've promised I reject this team.
By the way, since there is and even number of players, does a tie count as failure or as approval?
By the way, since there is and even number of players, does a tie count as failure or as approval?
As someone who just some time ago tried to pull a fake crovax, I'd say that evidence is not sufficient.
Most people agreed with the plan before you had even given your card out. It wasn't something I came up with after you had given it to Falc.
I'm sorry, but most people didn't even voice their opinion on this matter. If I recall correctly there were 3 people agreeing with it and at least 1(me) against it.
Well OK, more people liked the idea than didn't, happy?
I was just pointing out it wasn't something I came up with for me or Falcs benefit seeing as I had no idea who would get the card or who would post after that person.
If the others who haven't declared their vote reject the team it won't be going.
HappyWell OK, more people liked the idea than didn't, happy?
I was just pointing out it wasn't something I came up with for me or Falcs benefit seeing as I had no idea who would get the card or who would post after that person.
True, this point is more or less valid I believe, but perhaps you knew than none else was online and would take over? Though that is a really forced supposition.
Indeed, that's what I've just clarified. Some time ago I had a principle that whoever tries to push through the certainly untrue facts should be baddie... though as it turned out it is itself in most cases untrue.
Two or more spies on a mission is always bad for the spies. If they both support the first mission, that's good for the resistance even if it does give them "credit". If they both sabotage, then it makes it much easier for the resistance to figure out what's what.
In the beginning of the game, the best strategy is to attempt to pair up spies onto the mission teams. The worst thing for the resistance is to have a one-spy mission.
I sent my vote via PM. The front page says we can vote both by PM and publicly, why is my vote not counted?
I REJECT the team, BTW.
I REJECT the team, BTW.
I assume that if you prefer to vote by PM, you want to keep the vote a secret for the time being until the final count is disclosed.
Of course, if you want to vote by PM but have the vote included in counts or otherwise be openly disclosed, that's not a problem. Just indicate in the PM that this is your preference.
I'd suggest that in your votecounts just put 'PlayerName has voted via PM'. So we know they have voted, but you don't have to disclose the vote itself.
That's an idea, though a player might also want to give the appearance of being undecided.
I guess the best way to approach it is to let the individual player decide whether or not he wants it announced that he has voted and, if so, to also mention the contents of the vote.
I guess the best way to approach it is to let the individual player decide whether or not he wants it announced that he has voted and, if so, to also mention the contents of the vote.
Or we could just drop the whole ridiculous concept of private voting and then we don't have these complications.