Now that I've softened you guys up to the idea of a Cymsdale/Cliges combo, time to blow this pack wide open.
...except, as it turns out,
Cliges is a resistance member.
Therefore, from my perspective, the following are certainties
Cymsdale and Cliges are both resistance,
TNT is a Spy
It's now up to the spies to completely discredit me, that's really the only way they can have a decent chance. Therefore, if there is a fourth spy on this mission he will almost certainly sabotage, as building trust in us three is not going to give them much chance.
I'd damn well like to see a team with the three of us in it. Not sure who the fourth should be. And with the two 'keeping a close eye on you' cards, y'all can check up on us.
I suggest the player(s) with the KACEOY card(s) does not explicitly state if they intend to use it, and who they intend to use it on. This won't let any potential spies (that's me for you guys, or the 4th member from my perspective), from knowing whether to sabotage or not.
On second thoughts, maybe making sure you use it on the fourth guy to make sure we either get a spy, two spies, or a successful mission, is probably better.
I know now who should be the fourth member of the team.
If Falc is a spy, then what he has done is pretty damn dumb, or else part of some masterplan. I'd lean towards really dumb. You may not trust me yet, but I know that Falc as a spy really shouldn't have let the resistance get a 3-man chain of trust.
Sure, people were suggesting giving it to me. But it would've been easy to make up some BS argument for pretty much anyone else. No, I think that if Falc is a spy, he played a seriously bad move, or else is planning something complex to discredit me, and thus the two C's. With two KACEOY cards (albeit at his discretion) in play, it's going to be quite hard to discredit us by sabotaging a mission.
Therefore, I want to see a team of
Me
Cymsdale
Cliges
Falc
For the next round. Let's do this.
Resistance, and it shall, it would then be pretty obvious that it makes no sense for a goodie to lie and cover for a spy.
The plus side of the failed mission is that I at least know with no uncertainty or doubt the identity of one Spy. It might have been a big strategic mistake for tnt in the long term to sabotage so early. Further, if Cymsdale didn't have that card, it would have still left at least some confusion, but since we did have that card during that round, it just confirmed tnt as a Spy.[/QUOTE]
I know now, but I just wanted to note it down while I still remembered it, in case you were a spy and I had forgotten. But it's all good now.
So anyway, what do you think of my suggestion of Falc?
.
