Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

[The Resistance] Game 5

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
BTW, there's a better way for Spies to agree on who sabotages in case of multiple Spies: whoever voted last. Any rule that can be predicted before team proposal could lead to carefully crafting a team proposal that forces one specific Spy to expose himself.

(Could theoretically, I mean. Not sure if it's feasible in the tiny scope of only being allowed two tests before having to get it right...)
 
Falc said:
The two other cards will be dealt as randomly as possible. I want two different players giving me a 3-digit number each.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but here you go:
723
 
Falc said:
So...

EITHER
Marty/Cliges/Cymsdale are Resistance
OR
Marty is a Spy
OR
Marty and Cliges are Spies
OR
Marty/Cliges/Cymsdale are Spies

Let's see...

I will PROPOSE A TEAM CONSISTING OF:

FALC
MARTY
CYMSDALE
CLIGES

I'm not entirely sure yet if I trust Marty, but in a way, I prefer putting it up to a vote and letting everyone decide democratically.

The two other cards will be dealt as randomly as possible. I want two different players giving me a 3-digit number each.
Click to expand...

227

And Approve
 
Falc said:
I will PROPOSE A TEAM CONSISTING OF:

FALC
MARTY
CYMSDALE
CLIGES
Click to expand...
You went with the only option you could have made regardless of your role. (Un)Interesting.
APPROVE.

I'm not entirely sure yet if I trust Marty, but in a way, I prefer putting it up to a vote and letting everyone decide democratically.

The two other cards will be dealt as randomly as possible. I want two different players giving me a 3-digit number each.
Click to expand...
Falc, for the love of god if you're resistance you have to give one of the cards to Cymsdale or Cliges. If you end up not doing that I will brand you immediately as a spy. Don't be a bloody fool.


My number is 079
 
Falc said:
BTW, there's a better way for Spies to agree on who sabotages in case of multiple Spies: whoever voted last. Any rule that can be predicted before team proposal could lead to carefully crafting a team proposal that forces one specific Spy to expose himself.

(Could theoretically, I mean. Not sure if it's feasible in the tiny scope of only being allowed two tests before having to get it right...)
Click to expand...

Mmkay, so, you are a spy and just communicated to your spymate on how to collaborate...

Change my vote to REJECT
 
Xarkan said:
If they are all spies, and they won because of Cymsdale's 'meta-gaming of the system', then this forum game will not work anymore, and I will no longer participate. So for sake of liking this game, and not wanting to believe that people would do such things, I'm going to assume that is not happening.
Click to expand...

Oh, don't worry so much. I see it as a challenge. There's no guarantee that by being able to only sabotage once, the Spies will win every game.
 
jpr123 said:
That might be the case, if it wasn't for this:



So no, it wouldn't be that hard for a three spy team to get one sabotage.
Click to expand...
Except...I was the one who brought that to your attention. No one else would ever have remembered it, most likely. Why would I do that, now?

Also recall the post I made immediately after Cyms':
marty99 said:
If I am a spy with you, I will nevertheless sabotage every team we're both in, just for the lulz. And also to avoid any pillars of logic being built on faulty assumptions:
Click to expand...
Which kind of blows your argument apart, jaypee.

Xarkan said:
Stop editing your posts -_- I read them, then go back to them and they are different. I don't think the message change in general, but you added to it, making it possible to miss information.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry. I know it is annoying.

But I make a lot of text, and if I made them into separate posts, I will be double,triple, and quadruple posting quite a lot. So sometimes I edit it in, but I'll try to stop.
 
Falc said:
Oh, don't worry so much. I see it as a challenge. There's no guarantee that by being able to only sabotage once, the Spies will win every game.
Click to expand...

I'm more worried about the precedent of pre-setting up sabotage orders to avoid detection rather than playing the game like it's supposed to be played. I'm pretty sure most of the game is supposed to be focused around getting your ideal team approved, not gaming the sabotages.
 
Falc said:
BTW, there's a better way for Spies to agree on who sabotages in case of multiple Spies: whoever voted last. Any rule that can be predicted before team proposal could lead to carefully crafting a team proposal that forces one specific Spy to expose himself.

(Could theoretically, I mean. Not sure if it's feasible in the tiny scope of only being allowed two tests before having to get it right...)
Click to expand...
That is still too predictable. Some keywords or letters in specific positions may work better imho. But hell, how will they agree on this in the first place, without letting Res know?
 
Leader order list, remove TNT and myself.

723 modulo 7 is 2, gliomarto.

Remove glio from list.

227 modulo 6 is 5, Cymsdale.

Those two people get a Keeping a Close Eye on You card.
 
Falc said:
Leader order list, remove TNT and myself.

723 modulo 7 is 2, gliomarto.

Remove glio from list.

227 modulo 6 is 5, Cymsdale.

Those two people get a Keeping a Close Eye on You card.
Click to expand...
You could have used any operator you wanted, to get the exact result you wanted there :p

Not happy with this. Still, at least one resistance member has got a KACEOY card. I'm feeling pretty strongly gliomarto is a spy, though. I expect he'll try to out one of us at some stage. Probably Cymsdale as this is the most damage he could do.
 
Falc said:
Leader order list, remove TNT and myself.

723 modulo 7 is 2, gliomarto.

Remove glio from list.

227 modulo 6 is 5, Cymsdale.

Those two people get a Keeping a Close Eye on You card.
Click to expand...

Where did your moduli come from, are they conveniently made up to pick the people you wanted? It's a conspiracy! :p
 
marty99 said:
Which kind of blows your argument apart, jaypee.
Click to expand...

I wasn't accusing you of being spies, just saying that getting a single sabotage in a multi spy team isn't that impressive.

And I agree with Xarkan, it is pretty suspicious that Falc is giving out instructions for how spies should be sabotaging...
 
jpr123 said:
I wasn't accusing you of being spies, just saying that getting a single sabotage in a multi spy team isn't that impressive.

And I agree with Xarkan, it is pretty suspicious that Falc is giving out instructions for how spies should be sabotaging...
Click to expand...
Yes, but there is no way me and Cymsdale could communicate how to vote though. Last mission team, sure there might have been more than one. But I know that's not the case now.


I HAVE PRELOADED MY MISSION CARD.
 
Meh, could've been better, but whatever. Let's play a game of dice, not Resistance. At least it could've been worse as well.

Now, Cyms, I suppose we shall use our cards at the same time. And we should use them on this mission, as I'm inclined to believe this team has a high chance of not being spy-free.
To do this properly we will have to follow card rules to the letter and first wait for all mission orders to go in, at which point tamius will kindly notify us (I hope) and we will decide here as to whose orders we shall scan.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back